"build definition used" on build result
|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
"build definition used" on build result
by brettporter
::
Rate this Message:
A couple of questions/issues on this new feature:
* is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to what is in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build definition is later removed?) * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet) * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http:// maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action? buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8 Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter - brett@... Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ |
|
|
Re: "build definition used" on build result
by olamy-2
::
Rate this Message:
Hi,
* Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a clone and add of the buildDefinition). * Yes it is in the email. * It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm update/checkout failed -- Olivier 2007/9/23, Brett Porter <brett@...>: > > A couple of questions/issues on this new feature: > > * is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to what is > in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build > definition is later removed?) > * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet) > * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http:// > maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action? > buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8 > > Cheers, > Brett > > -- > Brett Porter - brett@... > Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ > > -- Olivier |
|
|
Re: "build definition used" on build result
by Emmanuel Venisse
::
Rate this Message:
olivier lamy a écrit : > Hi, > * Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a clone and add > of the buildDefinition). > * Yes it is in the email. > * It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm > update/checkout failed no, if the build fails in checkout/update, the build def must be hidden in the build result. Emmanuel > > -- > Olivier > > 2007/9/23, Brett Porter <brett@...>: >> A couple of questions/issues on this new feature: >> >> * is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to what is >> in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build >> definition is later removed?) >> * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet) >> * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http:// >> maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action? >> buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8 >> >> Cheers, >> Brett >> >> -- >> Brett Porter - brett@... >> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ >> >> > > |
|
|
Re: "build definition used" on build result
by brettporter
::
Rate this Message:
also when it is in progress
On 24/09/2007, at 6:50 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > > > olivier lamy a écrit : >> Hi, >> * Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a >> clone and add >> of the buildDefinition). >> * Yes it is in the email. >> * It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm >> update/checkout failed > > no, if the build fails in checkout/update, the build def must be > hidden in the build result. > > Emmanuel > >> -- >> Olivier >> 2007/9/23, Brett Porter <brett@...>: >>> A couple of questions/issues on this new feature: >>> >>> * is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to >>> what is >>> in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build >>> definition is later removed?) >>> * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet) >>> * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http:// >>> maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action? >>> buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8 >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Brett >>> >>> -- >>> Brett Porter - brett@... >>> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ >>> >>> -- Brett Porter - brett@... Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ |
|
|
Re: "build definition used" on build result
by Emmanuel Venisse
::
Rate this Message:
Brett,
you want to hide it when it is in progress or it is empty too? If it is empty, it's a bug but I don't want to hide it when the build is started. Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : > also when it is in progress > > On 24/09/2007, at 6:50 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > >> >> >> olivier lamy a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> * Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a clone >>> and add >>> of the buildDefinition). >>> * Yes it is in the email. >>> * It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm >>> update/checkout failed >> >> no, if the build fails in checkout/update, the build def must be >> hidden in the build result. >> >> Emmanuel >> >>> -- >>> Olivier >>> 2007/9/23, Brett Porter <brett@...>: >>>> A couple of questions/issues on this new feature: >>>> >>>> * is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to what is >>>> in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build >>>> definition is later removed?) >>>> * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet) >>>> * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http:// >>>> maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action? >>>> buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8 >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Brett >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Brett Porter - brett@... >>>> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ >>>> >>>> > > -- > Brett Porter - brett@... > Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ > > |
|
|
Re: "build definition used" on build result
by brettporter
::
Rate this Message:
It's empty too
On 24/09/2007, at 7:30 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > Brett, > you want to hide it when it is in progress or it is empty too? > > If it is empty, it's a bug but I don't want to hide it when the > build is started. > > Emmanuel > > Brett Porter a écrit : >> also when it is in progress >> On 24/09/2007, at 6:50 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: >>> >>> >>> olivier lamy a écrit : >>>> Hi, >>>> * Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a >>>> clone and add >>>> of the buildDefinition). >>>> * Yes it is in the email. >>>> * It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm >>>> update/checkout failed >>> >>> no, if the build fails in checkout/update, the build def must be >>> hidden in the build result. >>> >>> Emmanuel >>> >>>> -- >>>> Olivier >>>> 2007/9/23, Brett Porter <brett@...>: >>>>> A couple of questions/issues on this new feature: >>>>> >>>>> * is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to >>>>> what is >>>>> in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build >>>>> definition is later removed?) >>>>> * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet) >>>>> * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http:// >>>>> maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action? >>>>> buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8 >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Brett >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Brett Porter - brett@... >>>>> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ >>>>> >>>>> >> -- >> Brett Porter - brett@... >> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ -- Brett Porter - brett@... Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
