$\mu\mu$ folded to a single mu?

View: New views
2 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

$\mu\mu$ folded to a single mu?

by Joost Kremers-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

I just ran into what looks like a bug. If I have $\mu\mu$ in my document and
then fold it (with TeX-fold-buffer or whatever), only a single mu is displayed,
not two, as I'd expect.

This happens with emacs -Q and just AUCTeX loaded. Emacs is GNU Emacs 23.1.1,
AUCTeX is 11.85.

J.


--
Joost Kremers, PhD
University of Frankfurt
Institute for Cognitive Linguistics
Grüneburgplatz 1
60629 Frankfurt am Main, Germany


_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
auctex@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

Re: $\mu\mu$ folded to a single mu?

by Ralf Angeli-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

* Joost Kremers (2009-09-25) writes:

> I just ran into what looks like a bug. If I have $\mu\mu$ in my document and
> then fold it (with TeX-fold-buffer or whatever), only a single mu is displayed,
> not two, as I'd expect.
>
> This happens with emacs -Q and just AUCTeX loaded. Emacs is GNU Emacs 23.1.1,
> AUCTeX is 11.85.

I cannot reproduce this with the development version of AUCTeX.

--
Ralf


_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
auctex@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex