(apparently) HUGE kernel

View: New views
2 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

(apparently) HUGE kernel

by Robert Urban :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi Folks,

I'm trying to build a modest linux-2.6.28.7 kernel for a VIA C3 based
router/firewall which will boot from CF-card.

I've removed everything I can think of that is superfluous for my
application, things like virtualization, various things to support SMP,
almost all debug options, etc.  I've only left the IPV4 networking,
netfilter, QoS, a bit of USB support, etc.

Still the kernel (bzImage) is 12MB large.  gah.  On my Fedora10 system the
kernel is 2.5MB large.  A 12MB kernel isn't the end of the world, but it
just seems too large.

I would be grateful if someone could have a look at my config-file and
possibly offer an explanation.  The config file is here:

        http://www.spielwiese.de/rob/Buildroot/linux-config

cheers,

Rob Urban

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@...
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: (apparently) HUGE kernel

by Robert Urban :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Robert Urban wrote:
> Still the kernel (bzImage) is 12MB large.  gah.  On my Fedora10 system the
> kernel is 2.5MB large.  A 12MB kernel isn't the end of the world, but it
> just seems too large.
>
> I would be grateful if someone could have a look at my config-file and
> possibly offer an explanation.  The config file is here:
>
> http://www.spielwiese.de/rob/Buildroot/linux-config

as someone pointed out (thanks again), my bzImage includes the initramfs,
which is controlled by

        CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE="..."

cheers,

Rob Urban
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@...
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot