|
(no subject)
|
|
Re: (no subject)
|
|
Re: (no subject)
|
|
Re: (no subject)
|
|
Re: (no subject)
|
|
Re: (no subject)
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 10:37:08 James Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:08:20AM -0700, sevol wrote:
> > On 7/6/09, Burkhard W?lfel < versuchsanstalt@...> wrote:
> > minimal!!!
> Succinct.
> Obligatory thread hijack ... what minimum CPU performance is necessary
> for single track piano capture using MIDI via USB?
The old atari is overkill for the midi-part. If you find a 386 (or even 286)
with usb interface, try it and tell us if it really doesn't work because of
cpu performance.
Arnold
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@...
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
|
|
Re: (no subject)
|
|
Re: (no subject)
|
|
Re: (no subject)
|
|
Re: (no subject)
|
|
Re: (no subject)
|
|
Re: (no subject)
|
|
Re: (no subject)
I thought it was 4'32". On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Dave Phillips <dlphillips@...> wrote:
Ken Restivo wrote:
>
> This is awesome. Someone should start a thread of just nothing, and .sigs.
>
> We could call it 4'33"
>
>
Btw, I have a MIDI file of that piece, in case anyone wants it.
(Totally straightfaced),
dp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@...
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
|
|
Re: (no subject)
|
|
Re: (no subject)
On Thursday 09 July 2009 23:12:09 drew Roberts wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009 13:10:08 you wrote:
> > We could call it 4'33"
> Yeah but there could well be copyright issues if one person quotes another
> person's nothing.
No, until now citations are allowed if they stay within reasonable size
compared to the original. So you aren't allowed to quote the full silence but
quoting short extracts from empty mails is okay... (*)
Arnold
(*) Of course, german newspapers are working towards making citations non-free
of charge. :-/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@...
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
|
|
Re: (no subject)
And what does DRM have to say about your unauthorized citation of silence? Hmm? On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Arnold Krille <arnold@...> wrote:
On Thursday 09 July 2009 23:12:09 drew Roberts wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009 13:10:08 you wrote:
> > We could call it 4'33"
> Yeah but there could well be copyright issues if one person quotes another
> person's nothing.
No, until now citations are allowed if they stay within reasonable size
compared to the original. So you aren't allowed to quote the full silence but
quoting short extracts from empty mails is okay... (*)
Arnold
(*) Of course, german newspapers are working towards making citations non-free
of charge. :-/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@...
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@...
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
|
|
Re: (no subject)
Forget about DRM. What does the RIAA say about your unauthorized use of
silence in your music?
Oh, and you mean the "going-out-of-business newspapers"?
munkeyfreenix batcat wrote:
> And what does DRM have to say about your unauthorized citation of
> silence? Hmm?
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Arnold Krille wrote:
>
> On Thursday 09 July 2009 23:12:09 drew Roberts wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 July 2009 13:10:08 you wrote:
> > > We could call it 4'33"
> > Yeah but there could well be copyright issues if one person
> quotes another
> > person's nothing.
>
> No, until now citations are allowed if they stay within reasonable size
> compared to the original. So you aren't allowed to quote the full
> silence but
> quoting short extracts from empty mails is okay... (*)
>
> Arnold
>
> (*) Of course, german newspapers are working towards making
> citations non-free
> of charge. :-/
--
David
gnome@...
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@...
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
|
|
Re: (no subject)
If I sample some funky silence, do you think they can work out if I stole it from Michael Jackson or from James Brown?
QUOTE QUOTE QUOTE (blame yahoo)
Forget about DRM. What does the RIAA say about your unauthorized use of
silence in your music?
Oh, and you mean the "going-out-of-business newspapers"?
munkeyfreenix batcat wrote:
> And what does DRM have to say about your unauthorized citation of
> silence? Hmm?
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Arnold Krille wrote:
>
> On Thursday 09 July 2009 23:12:09 drew Roberts wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 July 2009 13:10:08 you wrote:
> > > We could call it 4'33"
> > Yeah but there could well be copyright issues if one person
> quotes another
> > person's nothing.
>
> No, until now citations are allowed if they stay within reasonable size
> compared to the original. So you aren't allowed to quote the full
> silence but
> quoting short extracts from empty mails is okay... (*)
>
> Arnold
>
> (*) Of course, german newspapers are working towards making
> citations non-free
> of charge. :-/
--
David
gnome@...
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@...
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user ____________________________________________________________________________________
Access Yahoo!7 Mail on your mobile. Anytime. Anywhere.
Show me how: http://au.mobile.yahoo.com/mail_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@...
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
|
|
Re: (no subject)
depends on whose lawyers notice your copyright infringement first. On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Norval Watson <norv2001@...> wrote:
If I sample some funky silence, do you think they can work out if I stole it from Michael Jackson or from James Brown?
QUOTE QUOTE QUOTE (blame yahoo)
Forget about DRM. What does the RIAA say about your unauthorized use of
silence in your music?
Oh, and you mean the "going-out-of-business newspapers"?
munkeyfreenix batcat wrote:
> And what does DRM have to say about your unauthorized citation of
> silence? Hmm?
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Arnold Krille wrote:
>
> On Thursday 09 July 2009 23:12:09 drew Roberts wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 July 2009 13:10:08 you wrote:
> > > We could call it 4'33"
> > Yeah but there could well be copyright issues if one person
> quotes another
> > person's nothing.
>
> No, until now citations are allowed if they stay within reasonable size
> compared to the original. So you aren't allowed to quote the full
> silence but
> quoting short extracts from empty mails is okay... (*)
>
> Arnold
>
> (*) Of course, german newspapers are working towards making
> citations non-free
> of charge. :-/
--
David
gnome@...
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@...
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
____________________________________________________________________________________
Access Yahoo!7 Mail on your mobile. Anytime. Anywhere.
Show me how: http://au.mobile.yahoo.com/mail
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@...
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
|
|
Re: (no subject)
It might be interesting to blindfold some lawyers and run some samples
past their ears to see if they could identify the original source with
any accuracy at all. ;-)
munkeyfreenix batcat wrote:
> depends on whose lawyers notice your copyright infringement first.
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Norval Watson wrote:
>
>
> If I sample some funky silence, do you think they can work out if I
> stole it from Michael Jackson or from James Brown?
>
>
> QUOTE QUOTE QUOTE (blame yahoo)
> Forget about DRM. What does the RIAA say about your unauthorized use of
> silence in your music?
>
> Oh, and you mean the "going-out-of-business newspapers"?
>
> munkeyfreenix batcat wrote:
> > And what does DRM have to say about your unauthorized citation of
> > silence? Hmm?
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Arnold Krille wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday 09 July 2009 23:12:09 drew Roberts wrote:
> > > On Thursday 09 July 2009 13:10:08 you wrote:
> > > > We could call it 4'33"
> > > Yeah but there could well be copyright issues if one person
> > quotes another
> > > person's nothing.
> >
> > No, until now citations are allowed if they stay within
> reasonable size
> > compared to the original. So you aren't allowed to quote the full
> > silence but
> > quoting short extracts from empty mails is okay... (*)
> >
> > Arnold
> >
> > (*) Of course, german newspapers are working towards making
> > citations non-free
> > of charge. :-/
--
David
gnome@...
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@...
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
|
signature.asc (204 bytes) 