|
View:
New views
20 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
| < Prev | 1 - 2 - 3 | Next > |
|
|
: inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduHi,
For the last months I've been coding on an application in Playground called MathematiK(but I'm open for better name suggestions). It's a frontend for other free software mathematics projects, giving them a nice KDE-based Worksheet view like Maple or Mathematica offer. Lately it has matured quite a bit, so I decided to ask you for inclusion into the KDE Edu 4.4 release, it's not perfect yet, but following the "release early, release often" philosophy I'm really looking forward to get more people testing it. How do you think about this? What are the steps I have to make to get MathematiK included? Some of the current features are: - Nice Worksheet view for evaulating Expression - View of plotting results inside the worksheet - Easy plugin based structure to add different Backends - Backends for: - the Sage mathematics software (http://www.sagemath.org) - the Maxima Computer Algebra System (http://maxima.sourceforge.net/) - the R project for Statistical computing (http://www.r-project.org/) - GetHotNewStuff integration to up/download example worksheets - Typesetting of mathematical formulas using LaTeX - Syntax highlighting depending on the chosen backend - Plugin based assistant dialogs for common tasks (like integrating a function or entering a matrix) Cheers, Alexander Rieder _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduHello Alexander,
The idea of such program have already popped up several times before: it means there is some demand for it. As for myself, I like the description of the program (however I have not compiled/tested it yet - will do it soon). My vote is for inclusion. On Friday 21 August 2009 02:45:13 Alexander Rieder wrote: > Hi, > > For the last months I've been coding on an application in Playground called > MathematiK(but I'm open for better name suggestions). It's a frontend for > other free software mathematics projects, giving them a nice KDE-based > Worksheet view like Maple or Mathematica offer. Lately it has matured quite > a bit, so I decided to ask you for inclusion into the KDE Edu 4.4 release, > it's not perfect yet, but following the "release early, release often" > philosophy I'm really looking forward to get more people testing it. How do > you think about this? What are the steps I have to make to get MathematiK > included? > > Some of the current features are: > - Nice Worksheet view for evaulating Expression > - View of plotting results inside the worksheet > - Easy plugin based structure to add different Backends > - Backends for: > - the Sage mathematics software (http://www.sagemath.org) > - the Maxima Computer Algebra System (http://maxima.sourceforge.net/) > - the R project for Statistical computing (http://www.r-project.org/) > - GetHotNewStuff integration to up/download example worksheets > - Typesetting of mathematical formulas using LaTeX > - Syntax highlighting depending on the chosen backend > - Plugin based assistant dialogs for common tasks (like integrating a > function or entering a matrix) > > Cheers, > Alexander Rieder > _______________________________________________ > kde-edu mailing list > kde-edu@... > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu -- With the best regards, Vladimir Kuznetsov _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduAlexander,
I'm not a KDE programmer yet (nor do I really know how to use these types of math programs) but I think I found a few minor issues: I like how when I compile kdegames, it tells me which packages are required and which are optional. I don't think that's been implemented in Mathematik yet. (For Ubuntu, I had to install r-base-dev and libspectre-dev) It appears that though the backends are supposed to be optional, not only is R required to start building but I think sage and maxima also end up being required. Here's my log: http://pastebin.ca/1539337 Thanks and keep up the good work, Jeremy Bicha On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Alexander Rieder <alexanderrieder@...> wrote: Hi, _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduOn Saturday 22 August 2009 22:07:38 Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Alexander, > > I'm not a KDE programmer yet (nor do I really know how to use these types > of math programs) but I think I found a few minor issues: > > I like how when I compile kdegames, it tells me which packages are required > and which are optional. I don't think that's been implemented in Mathematik > yet. (For Ubuntu, I had to install r-base-dev and libspectre-dev) > > It appears that though the backends are supposed to be optional, not only > is R required to start building but I think sage and maxima also end up > being required. Here's my log: http://pastebin.ca/1539337 > Sage and Maxima are only required at runtime. if the needed executables aren't found, the backends don't show up. For R I thought it was optional, but my CMake skills are limited. I'll have a look at it. LibSpectre is a hard requirement, as it is used throughout the app to render eps files, either generated by LaTeX, or as the result of plots. Alexander > Thanks and keep up the good work, > Jeremy Bicha > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Alexander Rieder > <alexanderrieder@... > > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > For the last months I've been coding on an application in Playground > > called MathematiK(but I'm open for better name suggestions). It's a > > frontend for other free software mathematics projects, giving them a nice > > KDE-based Worksheet view like Maple or Mathematica offer. Lately it has > > matured quite a > > bit, so I decided to ask you for inclusion into the KDE Edu 4.4 release, > > it's > > not perfect yet, but following the "release early, release often" > > philosophy > > I'm really looking forward to get more people testing it. How do you > > think about this? What are the steps I have to make to get MathematiK > > included? > > > > Some of the current features are: > > - Nice Worksheet view for evaulating Expression > > - View of plotting results inside the worksheet > > - Easy plugin based structure to add different Backends > > - Backends for: > > - the Sage mathematics software (http://www.sagemath.org) > > - the Maxima Computer Algebra System (http://maxima.sourceforge.net/) > > - the R project for Statistical computing (http://www.r-project.org/) > > - GetHotNewStuff integration to up/download example worksheets > > - Typesetting of mathematical formulas using LaTeX > > - Syntax highlighting depending on the chosen backend > > - Plugin based assistant dialogs for common tasks (like integrating a > > function > > or entering a matrix) > > > > Cheers, > > Alexander Rieder > > _______________________________________________ > > kde-edu mailing list > > kde-edu@... > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu > kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduHi,
On Saturday 22 August 2009 22:07:38 Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Alexander, > > I'm not a KDE programmer yet (nor do I really know how to use these types > of math programs) but I think I found a few minor issues: > > I like how when I compile kdegames, it tells me which packages are required > and which are optional. I don't think that's been implemented in Mathematik > yet. (For Ubuntu, I had to install r-base-dev and libspectre-dev) Today I added the message about missing optional dependencies > > It appears that though the backends are supposed to be optional, not only > is R required to start building but I think sage and maxima also end up > being required. Here's my log: http://pastebin.ca/1539337 The second failure was the result of me forgetting to remove an old linker flag. it's fixed in trunk. thanks for reporting, Alexander > > Thanks and keep up the good work, > Jeremy Bicha > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Alexander Rieder > <alexanderrieder@... > > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > For the last months I've been coding on an application in Playground > > called MathematiK(but I'm open for better name suggestions). It's a > > frontend for other free software mathematics projects, giving them a nice > > KDE-based Worksheet view like Maple or Mathematica offer. Lately it has > > matured quite a > > bit, so I decided to ask you for inclusion into the KDE Edu 4.4 release, > > it's > > not perfect yet, but following the "release early, release often" > > philosophy > > I'm really looking forward to get more people testing it. How do you > > think about this? What are the steps I have to make to get MathematiK > > included? > > > > Some of the current features are: > > - Nice Worksheet view for evaulating Expression > > - View of plotting results inside the worksheet > > - Easy plugin based structure to add different Backends > > - Backends for: > > - the Sage mathematics software (http://www.sagemath.org) > > - the Maxima Computer Algebra System (http://maxima.sourceforge.net/) > > - the R project for Statistical computing (http://www.r-project.org/) > > - GetHotNewStuff integration to up/download example worksheets > > - Typesetting of mathematical formulas using LaTeX > > - Syntax highlighting depending on the chosen backend > > - Plugin based assistant dialogs for common tasks (like integrating a > > function > > or entering a matrix) > > > > Cheers, > > Alexander Rieder > > _______________________________________________ > > kde-edu mailing list > > kde-edu@... > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu > kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduOn Friday, 2009-08-21, Alexander Rieder wrote:
> Hi, > > For the last months I've been coding on an application in Playground called > MathematiK(but I'm open for better name suggestions). It's a frontend for > other free software mathematics projects, giving them a nice KDE-based > Worksheet view like Maple or Mathematica offer. Lately it has matured quite > a bit, so I decided to ask you for inclusion into the KDE Edu 4.4 release, > it's not perfect yet, but following the "release early, release often" > philosophy I'm really looking forward to get more people testing it. How do > you think about this? What are the steps I have to make to get MathematiK > included? different name before inclusion. One thing is that KDE programs in general moved away from highlighting K somewhere within the name by uppercasing it, because people never get this right when writing about it. Another thing is that it is extremely close to one of the competitor's name. Maybe there is some famous mathematician with K initials or a mathematic technique (similar to the product that it named "Derive") Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduLe lundi 24 août 2009 12:29:44, Kevin Krammer a écrit :
> On Friday, 2009-08-21, Alexander Rieder wrote: > > Hi, > > > > For the last months I've been coding on an application in Playground > > called MathematiK(but I'm open for better name suggestions). It's a > > frontend for other free software mathematics projects, giving them a nice > > KDE-based Worksheet view like Maple or Mathematica offer. Lately it has > > matured quite a bit, so I decided to ask you for inclusion into the KDE > > Edu 4.4 release, it's not perfect yet, but following the "release early, > > release often" philosophy I'm really looking forward to get more people > > testing it. How do you think about this? What are the steps I have to > > make to get MathematiK included? > > Of course this is totally up to you, but I would recommend thinking about a > different name before inclusion. > > One thing is that KDE programs in general moved away from highlighting K > somewhere within the name by uppercasing it, because people never get this > right when writing about it. > > Another thing is that it is extremely close to one of the competitor's > name. > > Maybe there is some famous mathematician with K initials or a mathematic > technique (similar to the product that it named "Derive") > > Cheers, > Kevin > A short reminder about the moving to kdeedu: The process for inclusion in kdeedu is to first move the application to kdereview and at the same time to describe it to kde-core-devel mailing list and ask for inclusion in kdeedu. The basic requirements are that it's as much as possible based on kdelibs, it builds well, it has a complete doc and it is i18n ready. Having a usability study for it and ensuring you did some profiling are nice additions. The application will stay for 2 weeks in kdereview where it gets peer review (usually in the form of answers on the kde-core-devel mailing list) If no problems are discovered it can be moved to kdeedu and a bug component canbe created for it as well as webpages. You might also considere to blog about it and to aggregate your blog on Planet KDE to create a buzz! More on http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/SVN_Guidelines Best regards, Anne-Marie _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduOn Monday, 2009-08-24, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
> A short reminder about the moving to kdeedu: > > The process for inclusion in kdeedu is to first move the application to > kdereview and at the same time to describe it to kde-core-devel mailing > list and ask for inclusion in kdeedu. The basic requirements are that it's > as much as possible based on kdelibs, it builds well, it has a complete doc > and it is i18n ready. Having a usability study for it and ensuring you did > some profiling are nice additions. > The application will stay for 2 weeks in kdereview where it gets peer > review (usually in the form of answers on the kde-core-devel mailing list) > If no problems are discovered it can be moved to kdeedu and a bug component > canbe created for it as well as webpages. You might also considere to blog > about it and to aggregate your blog on Planet KDE to create a buzz! even just for a while. We at KDE PIM do the latter for Akonadi resources provided by new developers, e.g the Google Data resource. It has the advantage that the author can do more releases at the beginning, e.g. two or three between KDE releases, can decide on release dates (e.g. delay if a critical bug is found), etc. The application is still being translated by KDE's localization teams, it can be tagged to automatically be included in a source tarball at KDE releases, etc. Famous extregear apps are Amarok and K3b. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeedu-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Alexander Rieder schrieb: > Hi, > ... > Some of the current features are: ... > - Backends for: > - the Sage mathematics software (http://www.sagemath.org) > - the Maxima Computer Algebra System (http://maxima.sourceforge.net/) > - the R project for Statistical computing (http://www.r-project.org/) I just tried to compile mathematik on windows and I found some problems - - If R is not available, currently the build fails because you use message(FATAL_ERROR) in your FindR.cmake. I think I can try to fix this myself, if you don't mind (so that in the end macro_optional_find_package works). - - In both Maxima and Sage backends you use kptyprocess to start the runtime executables. As there are no ptys on windows, I would like to know if you really need to use it instead of kprocess directly? If I find the time, I will take a look into that as well, but I might need a bit longer for that. > > Cheers, > Alexander Rieder regards, Patrick > _______________________________________________ > kde-edu mailing list > kde-edu@... > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkqShjcACgkQi49rfdk/G3abWQCfRqYHStDcQ/BuBp8rq8gb5NvH rT8An1x5Vkw7MAtOB1PleqF7p24L7Osb =4pzR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduOn Monday 24 August 2009 14:23:19 Patrick Spendrin wrote:
> Alexander Rieder schrieb: > > Hi, > > ... > > > Some of the current features are: > > ... > > > - Backends for: > > - the Sage mathematics software (http://www.sagemath.org) > > - the Maxima Computer Algebra System (http://maxima.sourceforge.net/) > > - the R project for Statistical computing (http://www.r-project.org/) > > I just tried to compile mathematik on windows and I found some problems > - If R is not available, currently the build fails because you use > message(FATAL_ERROR) in your FindR.cmake. I think I can try to fix this > myself, if you don't mind (so that in the end > macro_optional_find_package works). code for the FindR.cmake was taken from the RKward project > - In both Maxima and Sage backends you use kptyprocess to start the > runtime executables. As there are no ptys on windows, I would like to > know if you really need to use it instead of kprocess directly? If I > find the time, I will take a look into that as well, but I might need a > bit longer for that. I was first using KProcess, but i remember having some really strange problems with it (like some commands not working, while others do), but maybe it can be changed so it uses kprocess on windows (as the're is very little code that needs to be changed, and it's all in (Sage|Maxima)Session ). Bye, Alexander > > > Cheers, > > Alexander Rieder > > regards, > Patrick > > > _______________________________________________ > > kde-edu mailing list > > kde-edu@... > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu > > _______________________________________________ > kde-edu mailing list > kde-edu@... > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu > kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduOn Monday 24 August 2009 12:29:44 Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Friday, 2009-08-21, Alexander Rieder wrote: > > Hi, > > > > For the last months I've been coding on an application in Playground > > called MathematiK(but I'm open for better name suggestions). It's a > > frontend for other free software mathematics projects, giving them a nice > > KDE-based Worksheet view like Maple or Mathematica offer. Lately it has > > matured quite a bit, so I decided to ask you for inclusion into the KDE > > Edu 4.4 release, it's not perfect yet, but following the "release early, > > release often" philosophy I'm really looking forward to get more people > > testing it. How do you think about this? What are the steps I have to > > make to get MathematiK included? > > Of course this is totally up to you, but I would recommend thinking about a > different name before inclusion. > > One thing is that KDE programs in general moved away from highlighting K > somewhere within the name by uppercasing it, because people never get this > right when writing about it. > > Another thing is that it is extremely close to one of the competitor's > name. > > Maybe there is some famous mathematician with K initials or a mathematic > technique (similar to the product that it named "Derive") I see, the name MathematiK was at first only chosen as a working title, as I totally suck at naming. The only other names I could come up with are: - Kauchy, after Augustin-Louis Cauchy - Cantor, after Georg Cantor - Kronecker, after Leopold Kronecker - or Konvergenz which is the german word for convergence I really hope somebody can give me a hint on how to call this thing. Bye, Alexander > > Cheers, > Kevin > _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeedu-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Alexander Rieder schrieb: > On Monday 24 August 2009 14:23:19 Patrick Spendrin wrote: >> Alexander Rieder schrieb: >>> Hi, >> ... >> >>> Some of the current features are: >> ... >> >>> - Backends for: >>> - the Sage mathematics software (http://www.sagemath.org) >>> - the Maxima Computer Algebra System (http://maxima.sourceforge.net/) >>> - the R project for Statistical computing (http://www.r-project.org/) >> I just tried to compile mathematik on windows and I found some problems >> - If R is not available, currently the build fails because you use >> message(FATAL_ERROR) in your FindR.cmake. I think I can try to fix this >> myself, if you don't mind (so that in the end >> macro_optional_find_package works). > Sure, go ahead, I don't really know how these CMake checks work anyway. The > code for the FindR.cmake was taken from the RKward project > >> - In both Maxima and Sage backends you use kptyprocess to start the >> runtime executables. As there are no ptys on windows, I would like to >> know if you really need to use it instead of kprocess directly? If I >> find the time, I will take a look into that as well, but I might need a >> bit longer for that. > > I was first using KProcess, but i remember having some really strange problems > with it (like some commands not working, while others do), but maybe it can be > changed so it uses kprocess on windows (as the're is very little code that > needs to be changed, and it's all in (Sage|Maxima)Session ). windows, so maxima is the only one needed. I have a patch here that uses KProcess instead of KPtyProcess, but since it doesn't work correctly yet, I don't want to send it to you. If I can get it working here on windows, then we can test it under Linux too. > regards, Patrick -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkqS4KcACgkQi49rfdk/G3Z0JwCbBWI/NdNYGeC7RHnkLZoP+v4/ uGcAn05i7imfu4VQ36x5FDvS0tyR6Utm =456x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
: FlashQard 0.14.0 uses KGeography dataHi,
A few days ago I sent an email to this mailing list and asked about using KGeography's data in my application. Well, the data are now being used in the new version of FlashQard (0.14.0) You might remember this software. A few months ago I asked about inclusion of FlashQard in kde-edu. But it was prefered to keep using Parley. Anyway, I thought it might be interesting for you to see how the data are being used. As it was mentioned in my last email, some of the maps are a bit modified. Capital cities are added to almost every map (of countries). Please visit the website of the project: http://flashqard-project.org and this is the download page: http://flashqard-project.org/download.php A big thank you goes to KGeography team for the great job. Kind regards, Shahab. _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduOn Monday 24 August 2009 20:49:11 Patrick Spendrin wrote:
> Alexander Rieder schrieb: > > On Monday 24 August 2009 14:23:19 Patrick Spendrin wrote: > >> Alexander Rieder schrieb: > >>> Hi, > >> > >> ... > >> > >>> Some of the current features are: > >> > >> ... > >> > >>> - Backends for: > >>> - the Sage mathematics software (http://www.sagemath.org) > >>> - the Maxima Computer Algebra System (http://maxima.sourceforge.net/) > >>> - the R project for Statistical computing (http://www.r-project.org/) > >> > >> I just tried to compile mathematik on windows and I found some problems > >> - If R is not available, currently the build fails because you use > >> message(FATAL_ERROR) in your FindR.cmake. I think I can try to fix this > >> myself, if you don't mind (so that in the end > >> macro_optional_find_package works). > > > > Sure, go ahead, I don't really know how these CMake checks work anyway. > > The code for the FindR.cmake was taken from the RKward project > > Ok, I will commit it directly to trunk if you don't mind. > > >> - In both Maxima and Sage backends you use kptyprocess to start the > >> runtime executables. As there are no ptys on windows, I would like to > >> know if you really need to use it instead of kprocess directly? If I > >> find the time, I will take a look into that as well, but I might need a > >> bit longer for that. > > > > I was first using KProcess, but i remember having some really strange > > problems with it (like some commands not working, while others do), but > > maybe it can be changed so it uses kprocess on windows (as the're is very > > little code that needs to be changed, and it's all in > > (Sage|Maxima)Session ). > > Looking at it, I just found out that Sage isn't available yet under > windows, so maxima is the only one needed. > I have a patch here that uses KProcess instead of KPtyProcess, but since > it doesn't work correctly yet, I don't want to send it to you. > If I can get it working here on windows, then we can test it under Linux > too. > maxima has the possibility to use a TcpSocket for communication (this is what for example WxMaxima does, see "maxima -s"). Maybe this should be used to get a portable Backend. regards, Alexander > regards, > Patrick > _______________________________________________ > kde-edu mailing list > kde-edu@... > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu > _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduOn Monday 24 August 2009 13:31:34 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
> Le lundi 24 août 2009 12:29:44, Kevin Krammer a écrit : > > On Friday, 2009-08-21, Alexander Rieder wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > For the last months I've been coding on an application in Playground > > > called MathematiK(but I'm open for better name suggestions). It's a > > > frontend for other free software mathematics projects, giving them a > > > nice KDE-based Worksheet view like Maple or Mathematica offer. Lately > > > it has matured quite a bit, so I decided to ask you for inclusion into > > > the KDE Edu 4.4 release, it's not perfect yet, but following the > > > "release early, release often" philosophy I'm really looking forward to > > > get more people testing it. How do you think about this? What are the > > > steps I have to make to get MathematiK included? > > > > Of course this is totally up to you, but I would recommend thinking about > > a different name before inclusion. > > > > One thing is that KDE programs in general moved away from highlighting K > > somewhere within the name by uppercasing it, because people never get > > this right when writing about it. > > > > Another thing is that it is extremely close to one of the competitor's > > name. > > > > Maybe there is some famous mathematician with K initials or a mathematic > > technique (similar to the product that it named "Derive") > > > > Cheers, > > Kevin > > I totally agree with that. > > A short reminder about the moving to kdeedu: > > The process for inclusion in kdeedu is to first move the application to > kdereview and at the same time to describe it to kde-core-devel mailing > list and ask for inclusion in kdeedu. The basic requirements are that it's > as much as possible based on kdelibs, it builds well, it has a complete > doc and it is i18n ready. Having a usability study for it and ensuring you > did some profiling are nice additions. > The application will stay for 2 weeks in kdereview where it gets peer > review (usually in the form of answers on the kde-core-devel mailing list) > If no problems are discovered it can be moved to kdeedu and a bug > component canbe created for it as well as webpages. You might also > considere to blog about it and to aggregate your blog on Planet KDE to > create a buzz! > > More on http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/SVN_Guidelines > > Best regards, > > Anne-Marie > > I've decided to rename MathematiK to Kantor (after Georg Cantor, the creator of set theory). I have a local checkout where the names are replaced, but what's the best way to commit it? Should I first commit the renamings, then rename the subdir in playground/edu (and move to kdereview at a second moment), or should I just skip the renaming of the subdir, and directly move trunk/playground/mathematik to /trunk/kdereview/kantor? What's the best way to do this renaming? How about the translations (at which point should messages.sh export to kantor.po istead of mathematik.po?) Is there anything else that needs to be done? thanks, Alexander > > _______________________________________________ > kde-edu mailing list > kde-edu@... > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu > _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduOn Monday 31 August 2009 16:21:39 Alexander Rieder wrote:
<snip> > > A short reminder about the moving to kdeedu: > > > > The process for inclusion in kdeedu is to first move the application to > > kdereview and at the same time to describe it to kde-core-devel mailing > > list and ask for inclusion in kdeedu. The basic requirements are that > > it's as much as possible based on kdelibs, it builds well, it has a > > complete doc and it is i18n ready. Having a usability study for it and > > ensuring you did some profiling are nice additions. > > The application will stay for 2 weeks in kdereview where it gets peer > > review (usually in the form of answers on the kde-core-devel mailing > > list) If no problems are discovered it can be moved to kdeedu and a bug > > component canbe created for it as well as webpages. You might also > > considere to blog about it and to aggregate your blog on Planet KDE to > > create a buzz! > > > > More on http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/SVN_Guidelines > > > > Best regards, > > > > Anne-Marie > > Hi, > I've decided to rename MathematiK to Kantor (after Georg Cantor, the > creator of set theory). I have a local checkout where the names are > replaced, but what's the best way to commit it? Should I first commit the > renamings, then rename the subdir in playground/edu (and move to kdereview > at a second moment), or should I just skip the renaming of the subdir, and > directly move trunk/playground/mathematik to /trunk/kdereview/kantor? > What's the best way to do this renaming? How about the translations (at > which point should messages.sh export to kantor.po istead of > mathematik.po?) Is there anything else that needs to be done? If it were me, I'd do it in 2 steps, first rename and get the translations going to the right po file, then move to kdereview. But you should ask kde- i18n-doc@... just to be sure (I've cc'ed them for ya). Jeremy > > thanks, > Alexander > > > _______________________________________________ > > kde-edu mailing list > > kde-edu@... > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu > > _______________________________________________ > kde-edu mailing list > kde-edu@... > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu > kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduOn Tuesday 01 September 2009 03:42:49 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > > > Hi, > > I've decided to rename MathematiK to Kantor (after Georg Cantor, the > > creator of set theory). I have a local checkout where the names are > > replaced, but what's the best way to commit it? Should I first commit > > the renamings, then rename the subdir in playground/edu (and move to > > kdereview at a second moment), or should I just skip the renaming of the > > subdir, and directly move trunk/playground/mathematik to > > /trunk/kdereview/kantor? What's the best way to do this renaming? How > > about the translations (at which point should messages.sh export to > > kantor.po istead of > > mathematik.po?) Is there anything else that needs to be done? > > If it were me, I'd do it in 2 steps, first rename and get the translations > going to the right po file, then move to kdereview. But you should ask > kde- i18n-doc@... just to be sure (I've cc'ed them for ya). this list so we'll test it and to i18n as well. Then I would say maybe after 1 day you can move to kdereview. Again you can CC i18n when you move as the translations will move as well. Same when you will include in kdeedu. I'll try to spend some time testing your program, this week is back to school week so it's not easy to find time for KDE with 4 kids ;) I talked yesterday on IRC with Jeremy about GHNS and he said you got upload to work. This is awesome news! Best regards, Anne-Marie _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduWhy not Cantor instead of Kantor ?
and, that maybe a bad naming for brazil , it can cause a lot of misunderstanding, since it means 'Singer' here. On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Anne-Marie Mahfouf<annemarie.mahfouf@...> wrote: > On Tuesday 01 September 2009 03:42:49 Jeremy Whiting wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > I've decided to rename MathematiK to Kantor (after Georg Cantor, the >> > creator of set theory). I have a local checkout where the names are >> > replaced, but what's the best way to commit it? Should I first commit >> > the renamings, then rename the subdir in playground/edu (and move to >> > kdereview at a second moment), or should I just skip the renaming of the >> > subdir, and directly move trunk/playground/mathematik to >> > /trunk/kdereview/kantor? What's the best way to do this renaming? How >> > about the translations (at which point should messages.sh export to >> > kantor.po istead of >> > mathematik.po?) Is there anything else that needs to be done? >> >> If it were me, I'd do it in 2 steps, first rename and get the translations >> going to the right po file, then move to kdereview. But you should ask >> kde- i18n-doc@... just to be sure (I've cc'ed them for ya). > yes, the best is to rename in playground and you can maybe CC the commit to > this list so we'll test it and to i18n as well. > Then I would say maybe after 1 day you can move to kdereview. Again you can CC > i18n when you move as the translations will move as well. Same when you will > include in kdeedu. > > I'll try to spend some time testing your program, this week is back to school > week so it's not easy to find time for KDE with 4 kids ;) > > I talked yesterday on IRC with Jeremy about GHNS and he said you got upload to > work. This is awesome news! > > Best regards, > > Anne-Marie > > > _______________________________________________ > kde-edu mailing list > kde-edu@... > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu > -- Um Computador sem Windows é como um Navio sem dançarinas de Can-Can _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduA Dimarts, 1 de setembre de 2009, Jeremy Whiting va escriure:
> On Monday 31 August 2009 16:21:39 Alexander Rieder wrote: > > <snip> > > > > A short reminder about the moving to kdeedu: > > > > > > The process for inclusion in kdeedu is to first move the application to > > > kdereview and at the same time to describe it to kde-core-devel mailing > > > list and ask for inclusion in kdeedu. The basic requirements are that > > > it's as much as possible based on kdelibs, it builds well, it has a > > > complete doc and it is i18n ready. Having a usability study for it and > > > ensuring you did some profiling are nice additions. > > > The application will stay for 2 weeks in kdereview where it gets peer > > > review (usually in the form of answers on the kde-core-devel mailing > > > list) If no problems are discovered it can be moved to kdeedu and a bug > > > component canbe created for it as well as webpages. You might also > > > considere to blog about it and to aggregate your blog on Planet KDE to > > > create a buzz! > > > > > > More on http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/SVN_Guidelines > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Anne-Marie > > > > Hi, > > I've decided to rename MathematiK to Kantor (after Georg Cantor, the > > creator of set theory). I have a local checkout where the names are > > replaced, but what's the best way to commit it? Should I first commit > > the renamings, then rename the subdir in playground/edu (and move to > > kdereview at a second moment), or should I just skip the renaming of the > > subdir, and directly move trunk/playground/mathematik to > > /trunk/kdereview/kantor? What's the best way to do this renaming? How > > about the translations (at which point should messages.sh export to > > kantor.po istead of > > mathematik.po?) Is there anything else that needs to be done? > > If it were me, I'd do it in 2 steps, first rename and get the translations > going to the right po file, then move to kdereview. But you should ask > kde- i18n-doc@... just to be sure (I've cc'ed them for ya). Any solution is valid i18n wise, just tell us what you did :D Albert > Jeremy > > > thanks, > > Alexander > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > kde-edu mailing list > > > kde-edu@... > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu > > > > _______________________________________________ > > kde-edu mailing list > > kde-edu@... > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu > _______________________________________________ kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
|
|
Re: : inclusion of MathematiK in kdeeduOn Tuesday 01 September 2009 16:05:23 Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> Why not Cantor instead of Kantor ? don't know, I kinda like K's ;-) but it's not a strong opinion. > and, that maybe a bad naming for brazil , it can cause a lot of > misunderstanding, since it means 'Singer' here. damn, why is it so difficult to find a good name? Can this problem be solved, by using C instead of K or should I try to think of a completely new one? > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Anne-Marie > > Mahfouf<annemarie.mahfouf@...> wrote: > > On Tuesday 01 September 2009 03:42:49 Jeremy Whiting wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > I've decided to rename MathematiK to Kantor (after Georg Cantor, the > >> > creator of set theory). I have a local checkout where the names are > >> > replaced, but what's the best way to commit it? Should I first commit > >> > the renamings, then rename the subdir in playground/edu (and move to > >> > kdereview at a second moment), or should I just skip the renaming of > >> > the subdir, and directly move trunk/playground/mathematik to > >> > /trunk/kdereview/kantor? What's the best way to do this renaming? How > >> > about the translations (at which point should messages.sh export to > >> > kantor.po istead of > >> > mathematik.po?) Is there anything else that needs to be done? > >> > >> If it were me, I'd do it in 2 steps, first rename and get the > >> translations going to the right po file, then move to kdereview. But > >> you should ask kde- i18n-doc@... just to be sure (I've cc'ed them > >> for ya). > > > > yes, the best is to rename in playground and you can maybe CC the commit > > to this list so we'll test it and to i18n as well. > > Then I would say maybe after 1 day you can move to kdereview. Again you > > can CC i18n when you move as the translations will move as well. Same > > when you will include in kdeedu. > > > > I'll try to spend some time testing your program, this week is back to > > school week so it's not easy to find time for KDE with 4 kids ;) > > > > I talked yesterday on IRC with Jeremy about GHNS and he said you got > > upload to work. This is awesome news! > > > > Best regards, > > > > Anne-Marie > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > kde-edu mailing list > > kde-edu@... > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu > kde-edu mailing list kde-edu@... https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu |
| < Prev | 1 - 2 - 3 | Next > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |