Thanks for feedback.
>I like the idea and the general implementation but have a problem with
>the name. When I saw its name I thought you were writing task for the
>autotools suite and not a task that would configure other tasks.
>autotaskconf?
I dont know the autotools suite, so that name was more intuitive for me.
>Regarding the implementation I wonder whether you couldn't use
>IntrospecitionHelper (maybe by opening it up a little) instead of
>writing your own reflection logic to determine the possible attributes.
>I fear the task's logic is bound to be different from
>IntroSpectionHelper in subtle ways which could lead to confusing bugs.
I am not familiar with the ISH, so that didnt come to my mind.
I'll have a look (when I have my next time slot ;-)
So it was good to place it in the sandbox before :O
Jan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...