<i18n dev> i18n hg

[gnu_andrew]

I was just about to check out the i18n forest as a precursor to
submitting a patch, but it seems the forest is massively outdated; the
latest build drop it includes is b25 which was just after the hg repos
were created!

What's going on here? Is there no i18n work being done?

I presume any patch would need to be proceeded by a merge before this
has any hope of being integrated into the main jdk7 forest.
--
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8

[yuri.nesterenko]

Hi Andrew,

i18n, I think, do push now to the swing forest.
I'm responsible for integrations for these groups, and I do
sync the swing forest only, not i18n.

Thanks,
-Yuri


Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> I was just about to check out the i18n forest as a precursor to
> submitting a patch, but it seems the forest is massively outdated; the
> latest build drop it includes is b25 which was just after the hg repos
> were created!
>
> What's going on here? Is there no i18n work being done?
>
> I presume any patch would need to be proceeded by a merge before this
> has any hope of being integrated into the main jdk7 forest.

[gnu_andrew]

2009/8/25 Yuri Nesterenko <Yuri.Nesterenko@...>:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> i18n, I think, do push now to the swing forest.
> I'm responsible for integrations for these groups, and I do
> sync the swing forest only, not i18n.
>
> Thanks,
> -Yuri
>
>
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> I was just about to check out the i18n forest as a precursor to
>> submitting a patch, but it seems the forest is massively outdated; the
>> latest build drop it includes is b25 which was just after the hg repos
>> were created!
>>
>> What's going on here? Is there no i18n work being done?
>>
>> I presume any patch would need to be proceeded by a merge before this
>> has any hope of being integrated into the main jdk7 forest.
>
>

Hi Yuri,

Thanks for the explanation.  It's certainly not obvious that's what's
going on!  In that case, can we not just get rid of the i18n forest?
--
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8