<link rel=reviewer>

View: New views
2 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

<link rel=reviewer>

by Anne van Kesteren-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

During the CSS WG we discussed a convention where someone would review a  
test and if the test was found fine she/he would add <link rel=reviewer>  
meaning that the test was approved. If the test was not found fine changes  
would be made and the original author would verify the changes. However,  
what flag is used in that case?

Would it make sense for the person making changes to add a <link  
rel=contributor> and for the original author to add the reviewer keyword  
to his/her <link rel=author> element? Roughly you would either end up with:

   <link rel=author href=...>
   <link rel=reviewer href=...>

or

   <link rel="author reviewer" href=...>
   <link rel=contributor href=...>

And the combination of the entities identified by author, contributor, and  
reviewer would be responsible for the correctness of the test.


(Until this is agreed upon/clarified I will not review any tests.)


--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/


Re: <link rel=reviewer>

by fantasai :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> During the CSS WG we discussed a convention where someone would review a
> test and if the test was found fine she/he would add <link rel=reviewer>
> meaning that the test was approved. If the test was not found fine
> changes would be made and the original author would verify the changes.
> However, what flag is used in that case?
>
> Would it make sense for the person making changes to add a <link
> rel=contributor> and for the original author to add the reviewer keyword
> to his/her <link rel=author> element? Roughly you would either end up with:
>
>   <link rel=author href=...>
>   <link rel=reviewer href=...>
>
> or
>
>   <link rel="author reviewer" href=...>
>   <link rel=contributor href=...>
>
> And the combination of the entities identified by author, contributor,
> and reviewer would be responsible for the correctness of the test.
>
> (Until this is agreed upon/clarified I will not review any tests.)

I've updated the review process and format documentation
   http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/review
   http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/format#reviewer
with the format requested by the WG
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0334.html

~fantasai