|

»

NetBeans Community Acceptance Testing (NetCAT)

[67cat] Bug at Java editor parsing

View: New views

4 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	[67cat] Bug at Java editor parsing by Michel Graciano :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message An friend of mine just face an issue yesterday at Java editor. Take a look at issue http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=167336 for details, but basically some Generics scenarios just doesn't compile but the editor shows as everything is okey or just some warnings are visible. Regards -- Michel Graciano Summa Technologies do Brasil Ltda. http://www.michelgraciano.com https://genesis.dev.java.net/ http://translatedfiles.netbeans.org/index_pt_BR.html https://copypastehistory.dev.java.net/
	Re: [67cat] Bug at Java editor parsing by Ulf Zibis-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message For me on RC3, NB shows no warning, no error, but compile reports error for: Map<String, List<String>> status = new <String,List<String>>HashMap(); -Ulf Am 18.06.2009 22:22, Michel Graciano schrieb: > An friend of mine just face an issue yesterday at Java editor. Take a > look at issue http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=167336 > for details, but basically some Generics scenarios just doesn't > compile but the editor shows as everything is okey or just some > warnings are visible. > > Regards > -- > Michel Graciano > Summa Technologies do Brasil Ltda. > http://www.michelgraciano.com > https://genesis.dev.java.net/ > http://translatedfiles.netbeans.org/index_pt_BR.html > https://copypastehistory.dev.java.net/
	Re: [67cat] Bug at Java editor parsing by Michel Graciano :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message The issue was closed as duplicated and the reason why this different behaviour happens too. The reason is because it is acceptable for JDK 7, what looks like an error at pre jdk 7 javac. So, since IDE uses an updated javac implementation, looks like it is already fixed. The question now is if IDE should or not follow the JDK defined for the project... Regards On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Ulf Zibis <Ulf.Zibis@...> wrote: For me on RC3, NB shows no warning, no error, but compile reports error for: Map<String, List<String>> status = new <String,List<String>>HashMap(); -Ulf Am 18.06.2009 22:22, Michel Graciano schrieb: An friend of mine just face an issue yesterday at Java editor. Take a look at issue http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=167336 for details, but basically some Generics scenarios just doesn't compile but the editor shows as everything is okey or just some warnings are visible. Regards -- Michel Graciano Summa Technologies do Brasil Ltda. http://www.michelgraciano.com https://genesis.dev.java.net/ http://translatedfiles.netbeans.org/index_pt_BR.html https://copypastehistory.dev.java.net/ -- Michel Graciano Summa Technologies do Brasil Ltda. http://www.michelgraciano.com https://genesis.dev.java.net/ http://translatedfiles.netbeans.org/index_pt_BR.html https://copypastehistory.dev.java.net/
	RE: [67cat] Bug at Java editor parsing by Matthies, Niklas :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message That's an interesting issue. IMO a warning is in order for static methods and constructors. For those methods the rationale given in JLS 15.12.2.1 does no apply, because they can't be overriding a method from a supertype (just hide one, for static methods). This is true regardless of JDK version. Apart from that, I don't think that it makes sense to try to be bug-compatible with Sun's JDKs. --nm From: Michel Graciano [mailto:michel.graciano@...] Sent: Thu, 18. Jun 2009 23:31 To: netcat@... Subject: Re: [67cat] Bug at Java editor parsing The issue was closed as duplicated and the reason why this different behaviour happens too. The reason is because it is acceptable for JDK 7, what looks like an error at pre jdk 7 javac. So, since IDE uses an updated javac implementation, looks like it is already fixed. The question now is if IDE should or not follow the JDK defined for the project... Regards On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Ulf Zibis <Ulf.Zibis@...> wrote: For me on RC3, NB shows no warning, no error, but compile reports error for: Map<String, List<String>> status = new <String,List<String>>HashMap(); -Ulf Am 18.06.2009 22:22, Michel Graciano schrieb: An friend of mine just face an issue yesterday at Java editor. Take a look at issue http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=167336 for details, but basically some Generics scenarios just doesn't compile but the editor shows as everything is okey or just some warnings are visible. Regards -- Michel Graciano Summa Technologies do Brasil Ltda. http://www.michelgraciano.com https://genesis.dev.java.net/ http://translatedfiles.netbeans.org/index_pt_BR.html https://copypastehistory.dev.java.net/ -- Michel Graciano Summa Technologies do Brasil Ltda. http://www.michelgraciano.com https://genesis.dev.java.net/ http://translatedfiles.netbeans.org/index_pt_BR.html https://copypastehistory.dev.java.net/