[AMPL 2904] Optimal with unscaled infeasibilities

View: New views
2 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

[AMPL 2904] Optimal with unscaled infeasibilities

by Amir-19 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Hi,

After solving a MIP problem using AMPL/CPLEX, I got this message

"Status recovering solution: optimal with unscaled infeasibilities"

I know I have to investigate the coefficient matrix for poorly scaled
rows and columns. i believe I can do that by checking constraint and
variable slacks for violations (negative slacks), is this the best
way? if not, I'd appreciate if you tell me the correct way.

Regards
Amir

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AMPL Modeling Language" group.
To post to this group, send email to ampl@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ampl+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ampl?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


[AMPL 2911] Re: Optimal with unscaled infeasibilities

by Robert Fourer-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



Yes, looking for negative slacks is the thing to do.  These may be numbers
pretty close to zero, so be sure option display_eps is set to 0 and options
solution_precision and solution_round are ''.

Bob Fourer
4er@...


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ampl@... [mailto:ampl@...]
> On Behalf Of Amir [amirmm11@...]
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 5:35 PM
> To: AMPL Modeling Language
> Subject: [AMPL 2904] Optimal with unscaled infeasibilities
>
> Hi,
>
> After solving a MIP problem using AMPL/CPLEX, I got this message
>
> "Status recovering solution: optimal with unscaled infeasibilities"
>
> I know I have to investigate the coefficient matrix for poorly scaled
> rows and columns. i believe I can do that by checking constraint and
> variable slacks for violations (negative slacks), is this the best
> way? if not, I'd appreciate if you tell me the correct way.
>
> Regards
> Amir
>



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AMPL Modeling Language" group.
To post to this group, send email to ampl@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ampl+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ampl?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---