|
»
»
[Announce] New Sqlbox version
|
View:
New views
11 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
[Announce] New Sqlbox version
by Alejandro Guerrieri-2
::
Rate this Message:
Hi,
I've just commited a new SqlBox version. Changes on this version are: - Added support for the LibSDB database abstraction library. DB support is now similar to Kannel's. - Extensive code reorganization to move the queries into the header files and allow reusing from the libsdb module. - Added examples for database connections on sample conf file. I've also started a numbering schema and I'm also tagging relevant versions. Cvs version 20081103 is now tagged as rev-0-6-0 and represents Sqlbox-0.6.0. Cvs version 20081113 is now tagged as rev-0-7-0. Cvs version 20081118 is now tagged as rev-0.7.1 (This is the latest release). As usual, you can checkout latest version from CVS, and also retrieve tagged versions as follow: cvs co -r rev-0-6-0 (to retrieve version 0.6.0, for example). You can also download this and former releases from here: http://www.kannel.org/~aguerrieri/ Regards, Alejandro Guerrieri |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [Announce] New Sqlbox version
by Ehizogie Binitie
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Alex
What are your thoughts on converting the timestamp on the sqlbox field into a basic scheduler. So messages are delivered if system time greater = or > msg time stamp? Ehi On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 10:15 -0200, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: > Ken, > > I've used SqlBox to handle 200-300K messages per day for months with > no issues using commodity hardware (P IV 3.0 Ghz with 1 Gig RAM) and > using the same box for kannel, sqlbox and MySQL. The traffic was > unevenly distributed across the day, with day hours receiving almost > all traffic. > > I think Sqlbox can handle that load on decent hardware. You'll have to > take into account other factors though, specially on the application's > side, as well as the SMPP traffic to your carrier. > > Regards, > > Alejandro Guerrieri > > El 18/11/2008, a las 09:46 a.m., Ken Bellars escribió: > > > Hi Alejandro, > > > > Your contributions are highly appreciated. > > > > Am about to use SQLbox for a production system for delivering 5million > > sms/monthly. please can SQLbox handle this seamlessly? > > > > I anticipate your early reply. > > > > On 11/18/08, Alejandro Guerrieri <aguerrieri@...> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've just commited a new SqlBox version. Changes on this version are: > >> > >> - Added support for the LibSDB database abstraction library. DB > >> support is now similar to Kannel's. > >> - Extensive code reorganization to move the queries into the header > >> files and allow reusing from the libsdb module. > >> - Added examples for database connections on sample conf file. > >> > >> I've also started a numbering schema and I'm also tagging relevant > >> versions. > >> > >> Cvs version 20081103 is now tagged as rev-0-6-0 and represents > >> Sqlbox-0.6.0. > >> Cvs version 20081113 is now tagged as rev-0-7-0. > >> Cvs version 20081118 is now tagged as rev-0.7.1 (This is the latest > >> release). > >> > >> As usual, you can checkout latest version from CVS, and also retrieve > >> tagged versions as follow: > >> > >> cvs co -r rev-0-6-0 (to retrieve version 0.6.0, for example). > >> > >> You can also download this and former releases from here: > >> > >> http://www.kannel.org/~aguerrieri/ > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Alejandro Guerrieri > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Kenny > > > > > > "Whosoever desires constant success must change his conduct with the > > times."-Niccolo Machiavelli > > |
|
|
Re: [Announce] New Sqlbox version
by Alejandro Guerrieri-2
::
Rate this Message:
I think that having scheduling capabilities would be cool, but I
definitely do not agree with using the time column, since that column is used internally on Kannel and cannot be tweaked without disrupting other stuff. I think this needs further thinking, though. There are performance considerations to take into account for example (when you have lots of messages queued, adding a condition on the select can impact performance if it's not done right). Regards, Alejandro Guerrieri El 18/11/2008, a las 12:36 p.m., Ehizogie Binitie escribió: > Hi Alex > What are your thoughts on converting the timestamp on the sqlbox field > into a basic scheduler. > > So messages are delivered if system time greater = or > msg time > stamp? > > Ehi > > On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 10:15 -0200, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: >> Ken, >> >> I've used SqlBox to handle 200-300K messages per day for months with >> no issues using commodity hardware (P IV 3.0 Ghz with 1 Gig RAM) and >> using the same box for kannel, sqlbox and MySQL. The traffic was >> unevenly distributed across the day, with day hours receiving almost >> all traffic. >> >> I think Sqlbox can handle that load on decent hardware. You'll have >> to >> take into account other factors though, specially on the >> application's >> side, as well as the SMPP traffic to your carrier. >> >> Regards, >> >> Alejandro Guerrieri >> >> El 18/11/2008, a las 09:46 a.m., Ken Bellars escribió: >> >>> Hi Alejandro, >>> >>> Your contributions are highly appreciated. >>> >>> Am about to use SQLbox for a production system for delivering >>> 5million >>> sms/monthly. please can SQLbox handle this seamlessly? >>> >>> I anticipate your early reply. >>> >>> On 11/18/08, Alejandro Guerrieri <aguerrieri@...> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've just commited a new SqlBox version. Changes on this version >>>> are: >>>> >>>> - Added support for the LibSDB database abstraction library. DB >>>> support is now similar to Kannel's. >>>> - Extensive code reorganization to move the queries into the header >>>> files and allow reusing from the libsdb module. >>>> - Added examples for database connections on sample conf file. >>>> >>>> I've also started a numbering schema and I'm also tagging relevant >>>> versions. >>>> >>>> Cvs version 20081103 is now tagged as rev-0-6-0 and represents >>>> Sqlbox-0.6.0. >>>> Cvs version 20081113 is now tagged as rev-0-7-0. >>>> Cvs version 20081118 is now tagged as rev-0.7.1 (This is the latest >>>> release). >>>> >>>> As usual, you can checkout latest version from CVS, and also >>>> retrieve >>>> tagged versions as follow: >>>> >>>> cvs co -r rev-0-6-0 (to retrieve version 0.6.0, for example). >>>> >>>> You can also download this and former releases from here: >>>> >>>> http://www.kannel.org/~aguerrieri/ >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Kenny >>> >>> >>> "Whosoever desires constant success must change his conduct with the >>> times."-Niccolo Machiavelli >> >> > > |
|
|
Re: [Announce] New Sqlbox version
by Alexander Malysh
::
Rate this Message:
Hi,
there is deferred filed in kannel Msg struct, that could be used for this... Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb: > I think that having scheduling capabilities would be cool, but I > definitely do not agree with using the time column, since that column is > used internally on Kannel and cannot be tweaked without disrupting other > stuff. > > I think this needs further thinking, though. There are performance > considerations to take into account for example (when you have lots of > messages queued, adding a condition on the select can impact performance > if it's not done right). > > Regards, > > Alejandro Guerrieri > > El 18/11/2008, a las 12:36 p.m., Ehizogie Binitie escribió: > >> Hi Alex >> What are your thoughts on converting the timestamp on the sqlbox field >> into a basic scheduler. >> >> So messages are delivered if system time greater = or > msg time stamp? >> >> Ehi >> >> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 10:15 -0200, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: >>> Ken, >>> >>> I've used SqlBox to handle 200-300K messages per day for months with >>> no issues using commodity hardware (P IV 3.0 Ghz with 1 Gig RAM) and >>> using the same box for kannel, sqlbox and MySQL. The traffic was >>> unevenly distributed across the day, with day hours receiving almost >>> all traffic. >>> >>> I think Sqlbox can handle that load on decent hardware. You'll have to >>> take into account other factors though, specially on the application's >>> side, as well as the SMPP traffic to your carrier. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>> >>> El 18/11/2008, a las 09:46 a.m., Ken Bellars escribió: >>> >>>> Hi Alejandro, >>>> >>>> Your contributions are highly appreciated. >>>> >>>> Am about to use SQLbox for a production system for delivering 5million >>>> sms/monthly. please can SQLbox handle this seamlessly? >>>> >>>> I anticipate your early reply. >>>> >>>> On 11/18/08, Alejandro Guerrieri <aguerrieri@...> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I've just commited a new SqlBox version. Changes on this version are: >>>>> >>>>> - Added support for the LibSDB database abstraction library. DB >>>>> support is now similar to Kannel's. >>>>> - Extensive code reorganization to move the queries into the header >>>>> files and allow reusing from the libsdb module. >>>>> - Added examples for database connections on sample conf file. >>>>> >>>>> I've also started a numbering schema and I'm also tagging relevant >>>>> versions. >>>>> >>>>> Cvs version 20081103 is now tagged as rev-0-6-0 and represents >>>>> Sqlbox-0.6.0. >>>>> Cvs version 20081113 is now tagged as rev-0-7-0. >>>>> Cvs version 20081118 is now tagged as rev-0.7.1 (This is the latest >>>>> release). >>>>> >>>>> As usual, you can checkout latest version from CVS, and also retrieve >>>>> tagged versions as follow: >>>>> >>>>> cvs co -r rev-0-6-0 (to retrieve version 0.6.0, for example). >>>>> >>>>> You can also download this and former releases from here: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.kannel.org/~aguerrieri/ >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Kenny >>>> >>>> >>>> "Whosoever desires constant success must change his conduct with the >>>> times."-Niccolo Machiavelli >>> >>> >> >> > > > |
|
|
Re: [Announce] New Sqlbox version
by Alejandro Guerrieri-2
::
Rate this Message:
Alex,
The deferred field does get processed and afaik it's passed on the SMPP link (as long as the SMSC supports it) so I'd rather don't touch it either :) Regards, Alejandro El 18/11/2008, a las 01:54 p.m., Alexander Malysh escribió: > Hi, > > there is deferred filed in kannel Msg struct, that could be used for > this... > > Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb: >> I think that having scheduling capabilities would be cool, but I >> definitely do not agree with using the time column, since that >> column is used internally on Kannel and cannot be tweaked without >> disrupting other stuff. >> I think this needs further thinking, though. There are performance >> considerations to take into account for example (when you have lots >> of messages queued, adding a condition on the select can impact >> performance if it's not done right). >> Regards, >> Alejandro Guerrieri >> El 18/11/2008, a las 12:36 p.m., Ehizogie Binitie escribió: >>> Hi Alex >>> What are your thoughts on converting the timestamp on the sqlbox >>> field >>> into a basic scheduler. >>> >>> So messages are delivered if system time greater = or > msg time >>> stamp? >>> >>> Ehi >>> >>> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 10:15 -0200, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: >>>> Ken, >>>> >>>> I've used SqlBox to handle 200-300K messages per day for months >>>> with >>>> no issues using commodity hardware (P IV 3.0 Ghz with 1 Gig RAM) >>>> and >>>> using the same box for kannel, sqlbox and MySQL. The traffic was >>>> unevenly distributed across the day, with day hours receiving >>>> almost >>>> all traffic. >>>> >>>> I think Sqlbox can handle that load on decent hardware. You'll >>>> have to >>>> take into account other factors though, specially on the >>>> application's >>>> side, as well as the SMPP traffic to your carrier. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>> >>>> El 18/11/2008, a las 09:46 a.m., Ken Bellars escribió: >>>> >>>>> Hi Alejandro, >>>>> >>>>> Your contributions are highly appreciated. >>>>> >>>>> Am about to use SQLbox for a production system for delivering >>>>> 5million >>>>> sms/monthly. please can SQLbox handle this seamlessly? >>>>> >>>>> I anticipate your early reply. >>>>> >>>>> On 11/18/08, Alejandro Guerrieri <aguerrieri@...> wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I've just commited a new SqlBox version. Changes on this >>>>>> version are: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Added support for the LibSDB database abstraction library. DB >>>>>> support is now similar to Kannel's. >>>>>> - Extensive code reorganization to move the queries into the >>>>>> header >>>>>> files and allow reusing from the libsdb module. >>>>>> - Added examples for database connections on sample conf file. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've also started a numbering schema and I'm also tagging >>>>>> relevant >>>>>> versions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cvs version 20081103 is now tagged as rev-0-6-0 and represents >>>>>> Sqlbox-0.6.0. >>>>>> Cvs version 20081113 is now tagged as rev-0-7-0. >>>>>> Cvs version 20081118 is now tagged as rev-0.7.1 (This is the >>>>>> latest >>>>>> release). >>>>>> >>>>>> As usual, you can checkout latest version from CVS, and also >>>>>> retrieve >>>>>> tagged versions as follow: >>>>>> >>>>>> cvs co -r rev-0-6-0 (to retrieve version 0.6.0, for example). >>>>>> >>>>>> You can also download this and former releases from here: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.kannel.org/~aguerrieri/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Kenny >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Whosoever desires constant success must change his conduct with >>>>> the >>>>> times."-Niccolo Machiavelli >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > > |
|
|
Re: [Announce] New Sqlbox version
by Kenny Orisanaiye
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Alejandro,
Is there any hope of having this scheduling capabilities in the SQLBox in the nearest future ? -- Kenny p: +2348034939090 e: kenny@... w: www.nuObjects.com Bulk SMS Solutions | Managed Hosting | Enterprise Application Development On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri <aguerrieri@...> wrote: Alex, |
|
|
Re: [Announce] New Sqlbox version
by Alejandro Guerrieri-2
::
Rate this Message:
What I've been considering is on a higher level: a way to be able to define your own SQL to fetch messages. That would allow you, among other niceties, to specify your own SQL, for example with an extra column to specify queueing date/time and a WHERE clause to handle it. On the other side, people not needing it would use the regular queries that perform better under heavy load. Still no ETA, though... stay tuned :) Regards, On 30/09/2009, at 13:25, Kenny Orisanaiye wrote: Hi Alejandro, |
|
|
Re: [Announce] New Sqlbox version
by Willy-21
::
Rate this Message:
To do SQLBox MySQL quick and dirty schedulling patch you just need to
add datetime type field in the table and edit sqlbox_mysql.h in my case it will be: #define SQLBOX_MYSQL_SELECT_QUERY "SELECT sql_id, momt, sender, receiver, udhdata, \ msgdata, time, smsc_id, service, account, id, sms_type, mclass, mwi, coding, \ compress, validity, deferred, dlr_mask, dlr_url, pid, alt_dcs, rpi, \ charset, boxc_id, binfo, priority, custom, insertdate FROM %S WHERE insertdate < NOW() LIMIT 0,1" Do ordinary make clean and make install. Run this SQLBox as a new daemon, so you will have 2 SQLBox running. Keep in mind that this scheduling will raise your memory consumption. I'm sure Alejandro has better solution. And hopefully the next SQLBox version will add internal Kannel Msg-ID, Foreign-ID, and compatibility with Meta-Data. Willy On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 12:25 +0100, Kenny Orisanaiye wrote: > Hi Alejandro, > > Is there any hope of having this scheduling capabilities in the SQLBox > in the nearest future ? > > -- > Kenny > > p: +2348034939090 > e: kenny@... > w: www.nuObjects.com > > Bulk SMS Solutions | Managed Hosting | Enterprise Application > Development > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri > <aguerrieri@...> wrote: > Alex, > > The deferred field does get processed and afaik it's passed on > the SMPP link (as long as the SMSC supports it) so I'd rather > don't touch it either :) > > Regards, > > Alejandro > > El 18/11/2008, a las 01:54 p.m., Alexander Malysh escribió: > > > > Hi, > > there is deferred filed in kannel Msg struct, that > could be used for this... > > Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb: > I think that having scheduling capabilities > would be cool, but I definitely do not agree > with using the time column, since that column > is used internally on Kannel and cannot be > tweaked without disrupting other stuff. > I think this needs further thinking, though. > There are performance considerations to take > into account for example (when you have lots > of messages queued, adding a condition on the > select can impact performance if it's not done > right). > Regards, > Alejandro Guerrieri > El 18/11/2008, a las 12:36 p.m., Ehizogie > Binitie escribió: > Hi Alex > What are your thoughts on converting > the timestamp on the sqlbox field > into a basic scheduler. > > So messages are delivered if system > time greater = or > msg time stamp? > > Ehi > > On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 10:15 -0200, > Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: > Ken, > > I've used SqlBox to handle > 200-300K messages per day for > months with > no issues using commodity > hardware (P IV 3.0 Ghz with 1 > Gig RAM) and > using the same box for kannel, > sqlbox and MySQL. The traffic > was > unevenly distributed across > the day, with day hours > receiving almost > all traffic. > > I think Sqlbox can handle that > load on decent hardware. > You'll have to > take into account other > factors though, specially on > the application's > side, as well as the SMPP > traffic to your carrier. > > Regards, > > Alejandro Guerrieri > > El 18/11/2008, a las 09:46 > a.m., Ken Bellars escribió: > > Hi Alejandro, > > Your contributions are > highly appreciated. > > Am about to use SQLbox > for a production > system for delivering > 5million > sms/monthly. please > can SQLbox handle this > seamlessly? > > I anticipate your > early reply. > > On 11/18/08, Alejandro > Guerrieri > <aguerrieri@...> wrote: > Hi, > > I've just > commited a new > SqlBox > version. > Changes on > this version > are: > > - Added > support for > the LibSDB > database > abstraction > library. DB > support is now > similar to > Kannel's. > - Extensive > code > reorganization > to move the > queries into > the header > files and > allow reusing > from the > libsdb module. > - Added > examples for > database > connections on > sample conf > file. > > I've also > started a > numbering > schema and I'm > also tagging > relevant > versions. > > Cvs version > 20081103 is > now tagged as > rev-0-6-0 and > represents > Sqlbox-0.6.0. > Cvs version > 20081113 is > now tagged as > rev-0-7-0. > Cvs version > 20081118 is > now tagged as > rev-0.7.1 > (This is the > latest > release). > > As usual, you > can checkout > latest version > from CVS, and > also retrieve > tagged > versions as > follow: > > cvs co -r > rev-0-6-0 (to > retrieve > version 0.6.0, > for example). > > You can also > download this > and former > releases from > here: > > http://www.kannel.org/~aguerrieri/ > > Regards, > > Alejandro > Guerrieri > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Kenny > > > "Whosoever desires > constant success must > change his conduct > with the > times."-Niccolo > Machiavelli > > > > > > > > > > |
|
|
Re: [Announce] New Sqlbox version
by Alejandro Guerrieri-2
::
Rate this Message:
Yep, my plan is to add support to those fields, and also the ability
to use your custom sql queries without needing to patch the source code :) Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerrieri@... On 30/09/2009, at 14:44, sangprabv wrote: > To do SQLBox MySQL quick and dirty schedulling patch you just need to > add datetime type field in the table and edit sqlbox_mysql.h in my > case > it will be: > > #define SQLBOX_MYSQL_SELECT_QUERY "SELECT sql_id, momt, sender, > receiver, udhdata, \ > msgdata, time, smsc_id, service, account, id, sms_type, mclass, mwi, > coding, \ > compress, validity, deferred, dlr_mask, dlr_url, pid, alt_dcs, rpi, \ > charset, boxc_id, binfo, priority, custom, insertdate FROM %S WHERE > insertdate < NOW() LIMIT 0,1" > > Do ordinary make clean and make install. Run this SQLBox as a new > daemon, so you will have 2 SQLBox running. Keep in mind that this > scheduling will raise your memory consumption. > > I'm sure Alejandro has better solution. And hopefully the next SQLBox > version will add internal Kannel Msg-ID, Foreign-ID, and compatibility > with Meta-Data. > > > > Willy > > > > > On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 12:25 +0100, Kenny Orisanaiye wrote: >> Hi Alejandro, >> >> Is there any hope of having this scheduling capabilities in the >> SQLBox >> in the nearest future ? >> >> -- >> Kenny >> >> p: +2348034939090 >> e: kenny@... >> w: www.nuObjects.com >> >> Bulk SMS Solutions | Managed Hosting | Enterprise Application >> Development >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri >> <aguerrieri@...> wrote: >> Alex, >> >> The deferred field does get processed and afaik it's passed on >> the SMPP link (as long as the SMSC supports it) so I'd rather >> don't touch it either :) >> >> Regards, >> >> Alejandro >> >> El 18/11/2008, a las 01:54 p.m., Alexander Malysh escribió: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> there is deferred filed in kannel Msg struct, that >> could be used for this... >> >> Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb: >> I think that having scheduling capabilities >> would be cool, but I definitely do not agree >> with using the time column, since that column >> is used internally on Kannel and cannot be >> tweaked without disrupting other stuff. >> I think this needs further thinking, though. >> There are performance considerations to take >> into account for example (when you have lots >> of messages queued, adding a condition on the >> select can impact performance if it's not done >> right). >> Regards, >> Alejandro Guerrieri >> El 18/11/2008, a las 12:36 p.m., Ehizogie >> Binitie escribió: >> Hi Alex >> What are your thoughts on converting >> the timestamp on the sqlbox field >> into a basic scheduler. >> >> So messages are delivered if system >> time greater = or > msg time stamp? >> >> Ehi >> >> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 10:15 -0200, >> Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: >> Ken, >> >> I've used SqlBox to handle >> 200-300K messages per day for >> months with >> no issues using commodity >> hardware (P IV 3.0 Ghz with 1 >> Gig RAM) and >> using the same box for kannel, >> sqlbox and MySQL. The traffic >> was >> unevenly distributed across >> the day, with day hours >> receiving almost >> all traffic. >> >> I think Sqlbox can handle that >> load on decent hardware. >> You'll have to >> take into account other >> factors though, specially on >> the application's >> side, as well as the SMPP >> traffic to your carrier. >> >> Regards, >> >> Alejandro Guerrieri >> >> El 18/11/2008, a las 09:46 >> a.m., Ken Bellars escribió: >> >> Hi Alejandro, >> >> Your contributions are >> highly appreciated. >> >> Am about to use SQLbox >> for a production >> system for delivering >> 5million >> sms/monthly. please >> can SQLbox handle this >> seamlessly? >> >> I anticipate your >> early reply. >> >> On 11/18/08, Alejandro >> Guerrieri >> >> <aguerrieri@...> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've just >> commited a new >> SqlBox >> version. >> Changes on >> this version >> are: >> >> - Added >> support for >> the LibSDB >> database >> abstraction >> library. DB >> support is now >> similar to >> Kannel's. >> - Extensive >> code >> reorganization >> to move the >> queries into >> the header >> files and >> allow reusing >> from the >> libsdb module. >> - Added >> examples for >> database >> connections on >> sample conf >> file. >> >> I've also >> started a >> numbering >> schema and I'm >> also tagging >> relevant >> versions. >> >> Cvs version >> 20081103 is >> now tagged as >> rev-0-6-0 and >> represents >> Sqlbox-0.6.0. >> Cvs version >> 20081113 is >> now tagged as >> rev-0-7-0. >> Cvs version >> 20081118 is >> now tagged as >> rev-0.7.1 >> (This is the >> latest >> release). >> >> As usual, you >> can checkout >> latest version >> from CVS, and >> also retrieve >> tagged >> versions as >> follow: >> >> cvs co -r >> rev-0-6-0 (to >> retrieve >> version 0.6.0, >> for example). >> >> You can also >> download this >> and former >> releases from >> here: >> >> http://www.kannel.org/~aguerrieri/ >> >> Regards, >> >> Alejandro >> Guerrieri >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Kenny >> >> >> "Whosoever desires >> constant success must >> change his conduct >> with the >> times."-Niccolo >> Machiavelli >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > |
|
|
Re: [Announce] New Sqlbox version
by Kenny Orisanaiye
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Alejandro,
This would be fantastic! Can't wait anymore. :) -- Kenny e: kenny@... w: www.nuObjects.com Bulk SMS Solutions | Managed Hosting | Enterprise Application Development On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri <aguerrieri@...> wrote: Yep, my plan is to add support to those fields, and also the ability to use your custom sql queries without needing to patch the source code :) |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
