|

[Bug 111] New: binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10

View: New views

4 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	[Bug 111] New: binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10 by Bugzilla from bugzilla@busybox.net :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=111 Host: openSESE 11.1 Target: mipsel Build: 2009.02-rc4 Summary: binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10 Product: buildroot Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Outdated package AssignedTo: unassigned@... ReportedBy: luke_tucker@... CC: buildroot@... Estimated Hours: 0.0 The configure script of binutils 2.17 tries to detect whether makeinfo is later than v4.4 however it does not take into account minor versions with double digits so v4.12 fails the test and stops binutils building even though the texinfo verion is valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@... http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
	[Bug 111] binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10 by Bugzilla from bugzilla@busybox.net :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=111 Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...> changed: What \|Removed \|Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC\| \|jacmet@... --- Comment #1 from Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...> 2009-02-18 07:38:16 UTC --- Ok, thanks for reporting. Why would you want to use binutils 2.17 instead of 2.19? Do you have the same issue with 2.19? As you probably noticed, 2.17 is marked as deprecated and is scheduled to go away in the next release (2009.05). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@... http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
	[Bug 111] binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10 by Bugzilla from bugzilla@busybox.net :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=111 Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...> changed: What \|Removed \|Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status\|NEW \|RESOLVED Resolution\| \|FIXED --- Comment #2 from Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...> 2009-03-03 21:24:19 UTC --- Fixed in r25512. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@... http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
	[Bug 111] binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10 by Bugzilla from bugzilla@busybox.net :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=111 --- Comment #3 from Luke <luke_tucker@...> 2009-03-07 13:11:03 UTC --- The reason I was using binutils 2.17 is because I'm building applications for a reverse engineered platform (TViX DVICO 6500) and I am trying to keep everything as close to the toolchain used by the original developers even though 2.19 will probably work as you say. Thanks for the fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@... http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot