|
View:
New views
2 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
[Bug 4736] Make RDF available through WSDL-related URIshttp://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4736 Summary: Make RDF available through WSDL-related URIs Product: WSDL Version: 2.0 Platform: All URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws- desc/2007May/0044.html OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: RDF Mapping AssignedTo: plh@... ReportedBy: jonathan@... QAContact: www-ws-desc@... Hi all, we still have an open issue 289 in the original issues list [1] about providing RDF representations of our various namespaces, with excerpts from the ontology defined in the RDF mapping. BTW, this may wait until after PR, I expect. The URIs used in the RDF mapping are now summarized there in App B [2]. The ontology (wsdl20.rdf) should live at http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-rdf We may consider putting RDF or RDDL at the following other URIs, too: MessageExchangePatterns and their labels: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-only http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-opt-out http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-in http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-only http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-opt-in http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-in-only http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-out-only SafeInteraction class: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-extensions OperationStyles: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/iri http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/multipart http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/rpc Signature extension: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/rpc The bindings: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap Is there an in-house style for adding RDF to pre-existing namespaces? |
|
|
Re: [Bug 4736] Make RDF available through WSDL-related URIsHi, there's progress on this: I'm in communication with Philippe (sent him a detailed email earlier this week) to solve this, it seems that we will include RDDL links to the RDF document for each of the URIs listed below and all the URIs that are fragment identifiers at these "namespaces". Best regards, Jacek On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:19 +0000, bugzilla@... wrote: > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4736 > > Summary: Make RDF available through WSDL-related URIs > Product: WSDL > Version: 2.0 > Platform: All > URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws- > desc/2007May/0044.html > OS/Version: All > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: P2 > Component: RDF Mapping > AssignedTo: plh@... > ReportedBy: jonathan@... > QAContact: www-ws-desc@... > > > Hi all, > we still have an open issue 289 in the original issues list [1] about > providing RDF representations of our various namespaces, with excerpts > from the ontology defined in the RDF mapping. BTW, this may wait until > after PR, I expect. > > The URIs used in the RDF mapping are now summarized there in App B [2]. > The ontology (wsdl20.rdf) should live at http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-rdf > We may consider putting RDF or RDDL at the following other URIs, too: > > MessageExchangePatterns and their labels: > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-only > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-opt-out > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-in > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-only > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-opt-in > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-in-only > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-out-only > > SafeInteraction class: > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-extensions > > OperationStyles: > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/iri > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/multipart > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/rpc > > Signature extension: > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/rpc > > The bindings: > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http > http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap > > Is there an in-house style for adding RDF to pre-existing namespaces? > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |