« Return to Thread: [Bug 647] New: Support __defineGetter__ and __defineSetter__ for HopObjects

[Bug 647] Support __defineGetter__ and __defineSetter__ for HopObjects

by Bugzilla from bugzilla-daemon@helma.at :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

http://helma.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=647





------- Comment #2 from hannes@...  2008-11-05 14:34 -------
The one thing that disturbs me about this patch is the implementation of
delete(). If the property is defined via ScriptableObject slot, the
ScriptableObject slot is deleted, but the Node property is left untouched.
That's not what delete() should do IMO. IIRC remember you said via IRC you
needed this behaviour for your special purposes, but I think it's somewhat
questionable to twist ECMA functionality according to personal needs. Is it ok
with you to actually delete the property in delete()?


--
Configure bugmail: http://helma.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
_______________________________________________
Helma-dev mailing list
Helma-dev@...
http://helma.org/mailman/listinfo/helma-dev

 « Return to Thread: [Bug 647] New: Support __defineGetter__ and __defineSetter__ for HopObjects