« Return to Thread: [Bug binutils/10297] New: inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments

[Bug binutils/10297] inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments

by Bugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread


------- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org  2009-06-22 22:50 -------
You said that the hex equivalent should be displayed for all immediate values
that are greater than 5 bits.  I found some cases where larger immediate values
do not have the hex equivalent value shown.

For example, loads and stores use addressing mode 2 which has 12 bit immediate
values. Here are 2 stores (str) that don't have hex equivalents...

   8: 14a4ff06 strtne pc, [r4], #3846
  18: 858028dd strhi r2, [r0, #2269]

Here are 2 coprocessor loads and stores (addressing mode 5) with 8 bit
immediates that don't have hex equivalents...

  3c: 4d7e6b9f ldclmi 11, cr6, [lr, #-636]!
 174: 0ca40a81 stceq 10, cr0, [r4], #516
 17c: 9d01082f stcls 8, cr0, [r1, #-188]

cs


--


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10297

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

 « Return to Thread: [Bug binutils/10297] New: inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments