|

»

»

Gnu - Binutils - Bugs

[Bug binutils/10380] New: cannot build binutils statically

View: New views

9 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	[Bug binutils/10380] New: cannot build binutils statically by Bugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message I'm trying to build binutils-2.19.1 statically. I tried with ../binutils-2.19.1/configure LDFLAGS="-static" && make but I get: ldd binutils/ar linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffaf9ff000) libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x00007fe1a223d000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007fe1a1ee2000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fe1a2453000) This procedure works for all other packages I'm trying to compile (gcc, bash, ...) but it seems not to work for binutils. Why? Is there perhaps another way to accomplish this? I also tried reading ./configure --help, README and binutils/README but there is no useful information. -- Summary: cannot build binutils statically Product: binutils Version: 2.19 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: booleandomain at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
	Re: [Bug binutils/10380] New: cannot build binutils statically by Nick Clifton :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hi, > I'm trying to build binutils-2.19.1 statically. I tried with > ../binutils-2.19.1/configure LDFLAGS="-static" && make but I get: Try adding a second dash. ie: ../binutils-2.19.1/configure LDFLAGS="--static" && make Cheers Nick _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
	[Bug binutils/10380] cannot build binutils statically by Bugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message ------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-10 15:17 ------- Subject: Re: New: cannot build binutils statically Hi, > I'm trying to build binutils-2.19.1 statically. I tried with > ../binutils-2.19.1/configure LDFLAGS="-static" && make but I get: Try adding a second dash. ie: ../binutils-2.19.1/configure LDFLAGS="--static" && make Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
	[Bug binutils/10380] cannot build binutils statically by Bugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message ------- Additional Comments From booleandomain at gmail dot com 2009-07-10 16:01 ------- It seems to work, thanks. But why do I need --static while all other packages (gmp, mpfr, bash, ...) work with -static? Also, I think there should be a document either in binutils sources or on the binutils homepage that explains how to build binutils statically. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
	[Bug binutils/10380] cannot build binutils statically by Bugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message ------- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-07-10 18:24 ------- binutils uses libtool, and libtool uses -all-static instead. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
	[Bug binutils/10380] cannot build binutils statically by Bugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message ------- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-07-13 16:16 ------- Works with LDFLAGS="--static". -- What \|Removed \|Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status\|NEW \|RESOLVED Resolution\| \|WORKSFORME http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
	[Bug binutils/10380] cannot build binutils statically by Bugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message ------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-14 07:41 ------- Created an attachment (id=4051) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4051&action=view) Document use of LDFLAGS="--static" -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
	[Bug binutils/10380] cannot build binutils statically by Bugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message ------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-14 07:42 ------- Hi, I take your point about documenting the use of LDFLAGS="--static", so I am going to apply the uploaded patch to the sources. Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
	[Bug binutils/10380] cannot build binutils statically by Bugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message ------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-14 07:43 ------- Subject: Bug 10380 CVSROOT: /cvs/src Module name: src Changes by: nickc@... 2009-07-14 07:43:19 Modified files: binutils : ChangeLog README Log message: PR 10380 * README: Document use of LDFLAGS="--static". Patches: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1495&r2=1.1496 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/README.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.8&r2=1.9 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils