http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13991--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com> 2012-04-23 15:25:57 UTC ---
I managed to narrow down the time frame when this broke to between 2011-07-09
and 2011-07-11:
works - binutils 2.20.1 with rtems 4.10 patches
works - binutils 2.21.1 with no patches
broken - binutils 2.22 with no patches
works - 2.21.52.20110627
works - 2.21.52.20110701
works - 2.21.52.20110708
works - 2.21.52.20110709
broken - 2.21.52.20110710
broken - 2.21.52.20110714
The timestamps for the file changes are so close except for the gold changes
that I can't separate them. Ignoring the gold changes, I see two entries in the
bfd and ld ChangeLogs. This is the single ld ChangeLog entry:
+2011-07-09 H.J. Lu <
hongjiu.lu@...>
+
+ PR ld/12942
+ * ldlang.c (section_already_linked): Pass "struct already_linked *"
+ to bfd_section_already_linked.
+ (lang_process): Set link_info.loading_lto_outputs before
+ loading LTO outputs.
+ * plugin.c: Include "libbfd.h".
+ (add_symbols): Call bfd_section_already_linked with comdat_key.
+
Since that mentions the phrase "already_linked" and our failure is on already
linked code, this looks like the culprit. I don't see any indication that a
test case like this one was tested for 12942.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@...
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
