[Cooker] Re: [RPM] cooker main/release x11-proto-devel-7.5-1mdv2010.1

[Götz Waschk]

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Paulo Ricardo Zanoni <devel@...> wrote:

> Name        : x11-proto-devel              Relocations: (not relocatable)
> Version     : 7.5                               Vendor: Mandriva
> Release     : 1mdv2010.1                    Build Date: Mon Nov  9 19:27:14 2009
> Install Date: (not installed)               Build Host: n5.mandriva.com
> Group       : Development/X11               Source RPM: (none)
> Size        : 2433401      License: MIT
> Signature   : (none)
> Packager    : Paulo Ricardo Zanoni <pzanoni@...>
> URL         : http://xorg.freedesktop.org
> Summary     : Xorg X11 protocol specification headers
> Description :
> X.Org X11 Protocol headers
> Paulo Ricardo Zanoni <pzanoni@...> 7.5-1mdv2010.1:
> + Revision: 463625
> - Update protos for 7.5 release

Hi Paulo,

what has happened to XShm.h?

Regards, Götz


--
AL I:40: Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

[Anssi Hannula-3]

Götz Waschk wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Paulo Ricardo Zanoni <devel@...> wrote:
>> Name        : x11-proto-devel              Relocations: (not relocatable)
>> Version     : 7.5                               Vendor: Mandriva
>> Release     : 1mdv2010.1                    Build Date: Mon Nov  9 19:27:14 2009
>> Install Date: (not installed)               Build Host: n5.mandriva.com
>> Group       : Development/X11               Source RPM: (none)
>> Size        : 2433401      License: MIT
>> Signature   : (none)
>> Packager    : Paulo Ricardo Zanoni <pzanoni@...>
>> URL         : http://xorg.freedesktop.org
>> Summary     : Xorg X11 protocol specification headers
>> Description :
>> X.Org X11 Protocol headers
>> Paulo Ricardo Zanoni <pzanoni@...> 7.5-1mdv2010.1:
>> + Revision: 463625
>> - Update protos for 7.5 release
> Hi Paulo,
>
> what has happened to XShm.h?

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/xextproto/commit/?id=c63abdd1eb7bc1d8ae4e25073ef2f29d94991e2b

--
Anssi Hannula

[Götz Waschk]

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Anssi Hannula <anssi@...> wrote:
>> what has happened to XShm.h?
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/xextproto/commit/?id=c63abdd1eb7bc1d8ae4e25073ef2f29d94991e2b
Ah, thanks.

Now what should I do with a program including XShm.h? Also,
/usr/include/X11/extensions/Xvlib.h uses XShmSegmentInfo which is not
defined anywhere anymore.


--
AL I:40: Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

[Anssi Hannula-3]

Götz Waschk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Anssi Hannula <anssi@...> wrote:
>>> what has happened to XShm.h?
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/xextproto/commit/?id=c63abdd1eb7bc1d8ae4e25073ef2f29d94991e2b
> Ah, thanks.
>
> Now what should I do with a program including XShm.h? Also,
> /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xvlib.h uses XShmSegmentInfo which is not
> defined anywhere anymore.

Sorry, I think this is a more useful commit:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libXext/commit/?id=1772c991ec6370fcf1bad79b00a87a02c5b484cc

So, libxext should be updated. (remember to add conflicts with old
x11-proto-devel when doing so!)

--
Anssi Hannula

[Paulo Zanoni]

Some headers have moved from x11-proto-devel to libXsomelibrary

But since libXsomething conflicts with the old x11-proto-devel, I had
to submit x11-proto and wait for it to be available to the build
system before submitting the new libXsomething. This should be fixed
today.

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Anssi Hannula <anssi@...> wrote:

> Götz Waschk wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Anssi Hannula <anssi@...> wrote:
>>>> what has happened to XShm.h?
>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/xextproto/commit/?id=c63abdd1eb7bc1d8ae4e25073ef2f29d94991e2b
>> Ah, thanks.
>>
>> Now what should I do with a program including XShm.h? Also,
>> /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xvlib.h uses XShmSegmentInfo which is not
>> defined anywhere anymore.
>
> Sorry, I think this is a more useful commit:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libXext/commit/?id=1772c991ec6370fcf1bad79b00a87a02c5b484cc
>
> So, libxext should be updated. (remember to add conflicts with old
> x11-proto-devel when doing so!)
>
> --
> Anssi Hannula
>

--
Paulo R. Zanoni