[Cooker] Re: [RPM] cooker main/testing firefox-3.5-1mdv2010.0

[Thierry Vignaud]

Tomasz Pawel Gajc <devel@...> writes:

> Tomasz Pawel Gajc <tpg@...> 0:3.5-1mdv2010.0:
> + Revision: 391138
> - diabable checking for undefinied references for now
> - add br on libalsa-devel

testing]# rpm -Uvh firefox-3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm xulrunner-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
        libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.11.9.0.11 is needed by firefox-0:3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586
        firefox = 3.0.10 is needed by (installed) firefox-fr-3.0.10-1mdv2010.0.i586
testing]# rpm -qp --provides libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm |fgrep libxul
libxulrunner = 1.9.1
libxul.so  
libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0
libxulrunner1.9.1(x86-32) = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0

[Bernard Siaud alias Troumad]

Thierry Vignaud a écrit :

> Tomasz Pawel Gajc <devel@...> writes:
>
>  
>> Tomasz Pawel Gajc <tpg@...> 0:3.5-1mdv2010.0:
>> + Revision: 391138
>> - diabable checking for undefinied references for now
>> - add br on libalsa-devel
>>    
>
> testing]# rpm -Uvh firefox-3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm xulrunner-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
>         libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.11.9.0.11 is needed by firefox-0:3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586
>         firefox = 3.0.10 is needed by (installed) firefox-fr-3.0.10-1mdv2010.0.i586
> testing]# rpm -qp --provides libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm |fgrep libxul
> libxulrunner = 1.9.1
> libxul.so  
> libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0
> libxulrunner1.9.1(x86-32) = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0
>
>
>  

Me too :
firefox-3.5-1mdv2010.0.x86_64 (car lib64xulrunner1.9.1[== 1.9.11.9.0.11]
est non satisfait)


--
Amicalement vOOotre, Troumad Alias Bernard SIAUD, http://troumad.org
N'envoyez que des documents avec des formats ouverts, comme
http://fr.openoffice.org
Adresse electronique speciale liste

[Tomasz Paweł Gajc]

Dnia 2009-07-01, o godz. 10:55:04
Thierry Vignaud <tvignaud@...> napisał(a):

> Tomasz Pawel Gajc <devel@...> writes:
>
> > Tomasz Pawel Gajc <tpg@...> 0:3.5-1mdv2010.0:
> > + Revision: 391138
> > - diabable checking for undefinied references for now
> > - add br on libalsa-devel
>
> testing]# rpm -Uvh firefox-3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm
> libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm
> xulrunner-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm error: Failed dependencies:
> libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.11.9.0.11 is needed by
> firefox-0:3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586 firefox = 3.0.10 is needed by
> (installed) firefox-fr-3.0.10-1mdv2010.0.i586 testing]# rpm -qp
> --provides libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm |fgrep libxul
> libxulrunner = 1.9.1 libxul.so libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0
> libxulrunner1.9.1(x86-32) = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0
>

Yes i noticed this too. Should be fixed in next release.

--
Regards,
TPG - MandrivaLinux's contributor

Provide best Xfce experience with best GNU/Linux distribution:
http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/XfceLive
  _
 ( )
  X ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
 / \ www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

[Tomasz Paweł Gajc]

Dnia 2009-07-01, o godz. 10:55:04
Thierry Vignaud <tvignaud@...> napisał(a):

> Tomasz Pawel Gajc <devel@...> writes:
>
> > Tomasz Pawel Gajc <tpg@...> 0:3.5-1mdv2010.0:
> > + Revision: 391138
> > - diabable checking for undefinied references for now
> > - add br on libalsa-devel
>
> testing]# rpm -Uvh firefox-3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm
> libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm
> xulrunner-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm error: Failed dependencies:
> libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.11.9.0.11 is needed by
> firefox-0:3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586 firefox = 3.0.10 is needed by
> (installed) firefox-fr-3.0.10-1mdv2010.0.i586 testing]# rpm -qp
> --provides libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm |fgrep libxul
> libxulrunner = 1.9.1 libxul.so libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0
> libxulrunner1.9.1(x86-32) = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0
>

Ok, FF-3.5 works fine for me.
I find this new release as faster responsive for user actions than
3.0.x. Feel free to test and ofcourse to provide some feedback ;)


--
Regards,
TPG - MandrivaLinux's contributor

Provide best Xfce experience with best GNU/Linux distribution:
http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/XfceLive
  _
 ( )
  X ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
 / \ www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

[Colin Guthrie-8]

'Twas brillig, and Tomasz Paweł Gajc at 01/07/09 23:51 did gyre and gimble:
>
> Ok, FF-3.5 works fine for me.
> I find this new release as faster responsive for user actions than
> 3.0.x. Feel free to test and ofcourse to provide some feedback ;)


Yeah running fine here. Had to update some extensions manually but such
is life.

All seems to be pretty responsive and memory use seems OK so far too.

Col


--

Colin Guthrie
cguthrie(at)mandriva.org
http://colin.guthr.ie/

Day Job:
   Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/]
Open Source:
   Mandriva Linux Contributor [http://www.mandriva.com/]
   PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/]
   Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]

2009/7/2 Tomasz Paweł Gajc <phenomenal@...>:

> Dnia 2009-07-01, o godz. 10:55:04
> Thierry Vignaud <tvignaud@...> napisał(a):
>
>> Tomasz Pawel Gajc <devel@...> writes:
>>
>> > Tomasz Pawel Gajc <tpg@...> 0:3.5-1mdv2010.0:
>> > + Revision: 391138
>> > - diabable checking for undefinied references for now
>> > - add br on libalsa-devel
>>
>> testing]# rpm -Uvh firefox-3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm
>> libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm
>> xulrunner-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm error: Failed dependencies:
>> libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.11.9.0.11 is needed by
>> firefox-0:3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586 firefox = 3.0.10 is needed by
>> (installed) firefox-fr-3.0.10-1mdv2010.0.i586 testing]# rpm -qp
>> --provides libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm |fgrep libxul
>> libxulrunner = 1.9.1 libxul.so libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0
>> libxulrunner1.9.1(x86-32) = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0
>>
>
> Ok, FF-3.5 works fine for me.
> I find this new release as faster responsive for user actions than
> 3.0.x. Feel free to test and ofcourse to provide some feedback ;)
>

Yes, it is really faster than 3.0 and consume less memory (about 30%
less under Linux). All plugins I am using are working well with it,
but there will always be people using plugins not supported yet, so
providing 3.5 for previous mandriva releases might be a complex
question (If it was only depending on me, I would provide it).

[donald stewart]

2009/7/2 Adrien Guichard <guichard.adrien@...>:

> 2009/7/2 Tomasz Paweł Gajc <phenomenal@...>:
>> Dnia 2009-07-01, o godz. 10:55:04
>> Thierry Vignaud <tvignaud@...> napisał(a):
>>
>>> Tomasz Pawel Gajc <devel@...> writes:
>>>
>>> > Tomasz Pawel Gajc <tpg@...> 0:3.5-1mdv2010.0:
>>> > + Revision: 391138
>>> > - diabable checking for undefinied references for now
>>> > - add br on libalsa-devel
>>>
>>> testing]# rpm -Uvh firefox-3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm
>>> libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm
>>> xulrunner-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm error: Failed dependencies:
>>> libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.11.9.0.11 is needed by
>>> firefox-0:3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586 firefox = 3.0.10 is needed by
>>> (installed) firefox-fr-3.0.10-1mdv2010.0.i586 testing]# rpm -qp
>>> --provides libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm |fgrep libxul
>>> libxulrunner = 1.9.1 libxul.so libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0
>>> libxulrunner1.9.1(x86-32) = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0
>>>
>>
>> Ok, FF-3.5 works fine for me.
>> I find this new release as faster responsive for user actions than
>> 3.0.x. Feel free to test and ofcourse to provide some feedback ;)
>>
>
> Yes, it is really faster than 3.0 and consume less memory (about 30%
> less under Linux). All plugins I am using are working well with it,
> but there will always be people using plugins not supported yet, so
> providing 3.5 for previous mandriva releases might be a complex
> question (If it was only depending on me, I would provide it).
>

Works fine here, thanks for the quick package.

[Colin Guthrie-8]

'Twas brillig, and Adrien Guichard at 02/07/09 05:36 did gyre and gimble:
> Yes, it is really faster than 3.0 and consume less memory (about 30%
> less under Linux). All plugins I am using are working well with it,
> but there will always be people using plugins not supported yet, so
> providing 3.5 for previous mandriva releases might be a complex
> question (If it was only depending on me, I would provide it).

Yeah same for me. I use the firebug and webdeveloper extensions and they
are all working well :)

I think a lot of 2009.1 users would appreciate this in backports.... :)

Col

--

Colin Guthrie
cguthrie(at)mandriva.org
http://colin.guthr.ie/

Day Job:
   Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/]
Open Source:
   Mandriva Linux Contributor [http://www.mandriva.com/]
   PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/]
   Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]

[Crispin Boylan-2]

Adrien Guichard wrote:

> 2009/7/2 Tomasz Paweł Gajc <phenomenal@...>:
>  
>> Dnia 2009-07-01, o godz. 10:55:04
>> Thierry Vignaud <tvignaud@...> napisał(a):
>>
>>    
>>> Tomasz Pawel Gajc <devel@...> writes:
>>>
>>>      
>>>> Tomasz Pawel Gajc <tpg@...> 0:3.5-1mdv2010.0:
>>>> + Revision: 391138
>>>> - diabable checking for undefinied references for now
>>>> - add br on libalsa-devel
>>>>        
>>> testing]# rpm -Uvh firefox-3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm
>>> libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm
>>> xulrunner-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm error: Failed dependencies:
>>> libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.11.9.0.11 is needed by
>>> firefox-0:3.5-1mdv2010.0.i586 firefox = 3.0.10 is needed by
>>> (installed) firefox-fr-3.0.10-1mdv2010.0.i586 testing]# rpm -qp
>>> --provides libxulrunner1.9.1-1.9.1-1mdv2010.0.i586.rpm |fgrep libxul
>>> libxulrunner = 1.9.1 libxul.so libxulrunner1.9.1 = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0
>>> libxulrunner1.9.1(x86-32) = 1.9.1-1mdv2010.0
>>>
>>>      
>> Ok, FF-3.5 works fine for me.
>> I find this new release as faster responsive for user actions than
>> 3.0.x. Feel free to test and ofcourse to provide some feedback ;)
>>
>>    
>
> Yes, it is really faster than 3.0 and consume less memory (about 30%
> less under Linux). All plugins I am using are working well with it,
> but there will always be people using plugins not supported yet, so
> providing 3.5 for previous mandriva releases might be a complex
> question (If it was only depending on me, I would provide it).
>
>  

hmmmm all seems ok except plugins for me (x86_64). The only plugin
loaded is "Skype Buttons".  In my plugins directory
(/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins) I have:

-rwxr-xr-x 1 1000 1000 9543400 2009-04-19 11:53 libflashplayer.so.bak*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      41 2009-03-12 08:11 libjavaplugin.so ->
/etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   66648 2008-11-02 13:06 libswfdecmozilla.so*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  291648 2009-02-25 14:45 mplayerplug-in-dvx.so*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root    1067 2009-02-25 14:45 mplayerplug-in-dvx.xpt*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  291648 2009-02-25 14:45 mplayerplug-in-gmp.so*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root    1067 2009-02-25 14:45 mplayerplug-in-gmp.xpt*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  291648 2009-02-25 14:45 mplayerplug-in-qt.so*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root    1067 2009-02-25 14:45 mplayerplug-in-qt.xpt*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  291648 2009-02-25 14:45 mplayerplug-in-rm.so*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root    1067 2009-02-25 14:45 mplayerplug-in-rm.xpt*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  295744 2009-02-25 14:45 mplayerplug-in.so*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  291648 2009-02-25 14:45 mplayerplug-in-wmp.so*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    1067 2009-02-25 14:45 mplayerplug-in-wmp.xpt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    1067 2009-02-25 14:45 mplayerplug-in.xpt

- but none are loaded at all.

cris.

[Colin Guthrie-8]

'Twas brillig, and Crispin Boylan at 02/07/09 08:23 did gyre and gimble:
> hmmmm all seems ok except plugins for me (x86_64). The only plugin
> loaded is "Skype Buttons".  In my plugins directory
> (/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins) I have:

Hmm, well this is a 32 bit plugin... you'll need nspluginwrapper to run
32 bit plugins. Did this run on previous firefox? If so then perhaps
nspluginwrapper needs tweaked.

Col
--

Colin Guthrie
cguthrie(at)mandriva.org
http://colin.guthr.ie/

Day Job:
   Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/]
Open Source:
   Mandriva Linux Contributor [http://www.mandriva.com/]
   PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/]
   Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]

[Éric Piel]

Op 02-07-09 09:23, Crispin Boylan schreef:
> Adrien Guichard wrote:

>>  
> hmmmm all seems ok except plugins for me (x86_64). The only plugin
> loaded is "Skype Buttons".  In my plugins directory
> (/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins) I have:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 1000 1000 9543400 2009-04-19 11:53 libflashplayer.so.bak*
:
> - but none are loaded at all.
Yes, indeed, same problem here: firefox 64bits only looks into
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/, not /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/

As a workaround, moving the plugins manually works.

Eric

[E_A_B_Piel.vcf]

---

begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:=C3=89ric Piel
n;quoted-printable:Piel;=C3=89ric
org:Technical University of Delft;Software Engineering Research Group
adr:HB 08.080;;Mekelweg 4;Delft;;2628 CD;The Netherlands
email;internet:E.A.B.Piel@...
tel;work:[phone]
tel;cell:[phone]
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://pieleric.free.fr
version:2.1
end:vcard

---

[Tomasz Paweł Gajc]

Dnia 2009-07-02, o godz. 00:17:08
Colin Guthrie <cguthrie@...> napisał(a):

> 'Twas brillig, and Tomasz Paweł Gajc at 01/07/09 23:51 did gyre and
> gimble:
> >
> > Ok, FF-3.5 works fine for me.
> > I find this new release as faster responsive for user actions than
> > 3.0.x. Feel free to test and ofcourse to provide some feedback ;)
>
>
> Yeah running fine here. Had to update some extensions manually but
> such is life.
>
> All seems to be pretty responsive and memory use seems OK so far too.
>
> Col
>
>

Nice to read this ;)

I'll try to tune up the ff-3.5 over this weekend.

--
Regards,
TPG - MandrivaLinux's contributor

Provide best Xfce experience with best GNU/Linux distribution:
http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/XfceLive
  _
 ( )
  X ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
 / \ www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

[Crispin Boylan-2]

Colin Guthrie wrote:

> 'Twas brillig, and Crispin Boylan at 02/07/09 08:23 did gyre and gimble:
>> hmmmm all seems ok except plugins for me (x86_64). The only plugin
>> loaded is "Skype Buttons".  In my plugins directory
>> (/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins) I have:
>
> Hmm, well this is a 32 bit plugin... you'll need nspluginwrapper to
> run 32 bit plugins. Did this run on previous firefox? If so then
> perhaps nspluginwrapper needs tweaked.
>
> Col

well I didnt even know I had it ;)  mine seems to be 64-bit and comes
from kopete-4.2.95-1mdv2010.0.  Even though its in
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins not /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins!

guess this proves Eric's statement that its only reading /usr/lib!

cris.

[Barry Jackson]

Colin Guthrie wrote:

> 'Twas brillig, and Adrien Guichard at 02/07/09 05:36 did gyre and gimble:
>> Yes, it is really faster than 3.0 and consume less memory (about 30%
>> less under Linux). All plugins I am using are working well with it,
>> but there will always be people using plugins not supported yet, so
>> providing 3.5 for previous mandriva releases might be a complex
>> question (If it was only depending on me, I would provide it).
>
> Yeah same for me. I use the firebug and webdeveloper extensions and they
> are all working well :)
>
> I think a lot of 2009.1 users would appreciate this in backports.... :)
>
> Col
>

I am running Firefox 3.5 in 2009.1 for several days now without problems.
Downloaded tar from Mozilla site and extracted to ~/
Pointed a symlink to it from /usr/bin after uninstalling prev. version
and it's fine.
It uses much less memory and is very snappy.
Barry.