cfergeau wrote:
> Author: cfergeau
> Date: Mon Oct 26 10:01:15 2009
> New Revision: 262795
>
> Modified:
> ldetect-lst/trunk/NEWS
> ldetect-lst/trunk/lst/pcitable
>
> Log:
> - use nvidia173 for 10de:2362 (#54768)
IMHO these kind of special cases (i.e. non-optimal driver used due to
bugs) should be documented in-line as comments either in Cards+ or
pcitable, so that one can easily see the reason for a strange entry when
one is updating the lists.
(Currently such documentation for the existing exceptions exists as
comments in Cards+, though I wonder if pcitable would be a better place
for many of them; it seems to support comment lines as well, beginning
with #)
> Modified: ldetect-lst/trunk/NEWS
> ==============================================================================
> --- ldetect-lst/trunk/NEWS (original)
> +++ ldetect-lst/trunk/NEWS Mon Oct 26 10:01:15 2009
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> - use "GeForce 6100 and later" for 10de:06ec (#54862)
> +- use nvidia173 for 10de:2362 (#54768)
>
> Version 0.1.278 - 15 October 2009
>
>
> Modified: ldetect-lst/trunk/lst/pcitable
> ==============================================================================
> --- ldetect-lst/trunk/lst/pcitable (original)
> +++ ldetect-lst/trunk/lst/pcitable Mon Oct 26 10:01:15 2009
> @@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@
> 0x10de 0x060f "Card:NVIDIA GeForce 6100 and later"
> 0x10de 0x0610 "Card:NVIDIA GeForce 6100 and later"
> 0x10de 0x0611 "Card:NVIDIA GeForce 6100 and later"
> -0x10de 0x0612 "Card:NVIDIA GeForce 6100 and later"
> +0x10de 0x0612 "Card:NVIDIA GeForce FX series"
> 0x10de 0x0613 "Card:NVIDIA GeForce 6100 and later"
> 0x10de 0x0614 "Card:NVIDIA GeForce 6100 and later"
> 0x10de 0x0615 "Card:NVIDIA GeForce 6100 and later"
>
--
Anssi Hannula
