|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
[Fwd: [ gtkpod-Bugs-2824432 ] gnome-autogen.sh only looks for automake > 1.10]Hi everyone,
I've received this bug report via the gtkpod tracker. Maybe someone more knowledgeable with autogen.sh can help? Cheers, JCS. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [ gtkpod-Bugs-2824432 ] gnome-autogen.sh only looks for automake > 1.10 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:05:17 +0000 From: SourceForge.net <noreply@...> To: noreply@... Bugs item #2824432, was opened at 2009-07-20 21:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by dm9-sluggo You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=519273&aid=2824432&group_id=67873 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: libgpod Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: sluggo (dm9-sluggo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: gnome-autogen.sh only looks for automake > 1.10 Initial Comment: when running gnome-autogen.sh with automake > 1.10 installed it cant find it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=519273&aid=2824432&group_id=67873 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Gtkpod-devel mailing list Gtkpod-devel@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkpod-devel |
|
|
Re: [Fwd: [ gtkpod-Bugs-2824432 ] gnome-autogen.sh only looks for automake > 1.10]Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> Welcome back Jorg ;) Yes, good to see you Jorg. Hopefully things are going well in your part of the world. :) > Updating gnome-autogen.sh to its latest version might be enough. Indeed that would work. One thing to think about before we do this is that the upstream gnome-autogen.sh from the gnome-common module¹ now passes -Wno-portability to automake. This creates a hard requirement on GNU make. Does anyone know if we are already doing things that require GNU make or not? I'd hate to add a new requirement if we don't need to. On the other hand, if we're already incompatible with non-GNU make, then it will be simpler to sync the gnome-autogen.sh script without differing from upstream (since the odds of remembering to always strip the -Wno-portability option when syncing seems low). ¹ http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gnome-common/tree/macros2/gnome-autogen.sh -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ An election is coming. Universal peace is declared and the foxes have a sincere interest in prolonging the lives of the poultry. -- T.S. Eliot ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Gtkpod-devel mailing list Gtkpod-devel@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkpod-devel |
|
|
Re: [Fwd: [ gtkpod-Bugs-2824432 ] gnome-autogen.sh only looks for automake > 1.10]On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 18:41, Todd Zullinger<tmz@...> wrote:
> Christophe Fergeau wrote: >> Updating gnome-autogen.sh to its latest version might be enough. > > Indeed that would work. One thing to think about before we do this is > that the upstream gnome-autogen.sh from the gnome-common module¹ now > passes -Wno-portability to automake. This creates a hard requirement > on GNU make. Does anyone know if we are already doing things that > require GNU make or not? I'd hate to add a new requirement if we > don't need to. 'portablity' warnings category is exactly about opposite: Automake will warn you if some GNU Make specific construction used. The same about other make implementation specific extensions. In another words, it doesn't create new dependency on gmake, moreover it allows you to avoid such dependency to be created accidentally. -- Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew.w.nosenko@...> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Gtkpod-devel mailing list Gtkpod-devel@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkpod-devel |
|
|
Re: [Fwd: [ gtkpod-Bugs-2824432 ] gnome-autogen.sh only looks for automake > 1.10]On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 15:00, Andrew W.
Nosenko<andrew.w.nosenko@...> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 18:41, Todd Zullinger<tmz@...> wrote: >> Christophe Fergeau wrote: >>> Updating gnome-autogen.sh to its latest version might be enough. >> >> Indeed that would work. One thing to think about before we do this is >> that the upstream gnome-autogen.sh from the gnome-common module¹ now >> passes -Wno-portability to automake. This creates a hard requirement >> on GNU make. Does anyone know if we are already doing things that >> require GNU make or not? I'd hate to add a new requirement if we >> don't need to. > > 'portablity' warnings category is exactly about opposite: Automake > will warn you if some GNU Make specific construction used. The same > about other make implementation specific extensions. In another > words, it doesn't create new dependency on gmake, moreover it allows > you to avoid such dependency to be created accidentally. > Sorry :-( I'm didn't paid attention on "negation" of option... They efficiently silenced such portability warnings... :-( But anyway, while it creates room for inserting GNU Make specific constructs, it doesn't do it by self. -- Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew.w.nosenko@...> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Gtkpod-devel mailing list Gtkpod-devel@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkpod-devel |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |