|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
[Fwd: ASK: URI validation service]Fwd'ing to uri@... from the SW IG list. Can anyone here advise? It would also be interesting to hear about the state of URI validation libraries, even if they're not currently exposed as Web Services. cheers, Dan -------- Original Message -------- Subject: ASK: URI validation service Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:08:52 +0000 Resent-From: semantic-web@... Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:08:06 +0200 From: Michael Schneider <schneid@...> To: <semantic-web@...> Hi! Is there any online URI/IRI validation service, which takes a string and reliably tells me whether the string matches the specification of a URI or IRI according to RFC 3986 or RFC 3987, respectively? Cheers, Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: michael.schneider@... WWW : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider ======================================================================= FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor, Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus ======================================================================= |
|
|
Re: [Fwd: ASK: URI validation service]On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:23:24 +0200, Dan Brickley <danbri@...> wrote:
> Fwd'ing to uri@... from the SW IG list. Can anyone here advise? It > would also be interesting to hear about the state of URI validation > libraries, even if they're not currently exposed as Web Services. Validator.nu does IRI reference validation for attributes that take them as value. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ |
|
|
Re: [Fwd: ASK: URI validation service]Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:23:24 +0200, Dan Brickley <danbri@...> wrote: >> Fwd'ing to uri@... from the SW IG list. Can anyone here advise? It >> would also be interesting to hear about the state of URI validation >> libraries, even if they're not currently exposed as Web Services. > Validator.nu does IRI reference validation for attributes that take them as value. http://uriparser.sourceforge.net/ and other URI parser implementations are an option. submitting a URI would be easy, but the question is what to return: just a (URI|IRI|invalid) response, or some sort of parsing result that can be used to process the URI? the latter option might be interesting beyond mere validation, but then again URI parsing is such a low-level task that in most cases, people will probably prefer to have it as a local library, instead of using a web service. cheers, erik wilde tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814 dret@... - http://dret.net/netdret UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) |
|
|
Re: [Fwd: ASK: URI validation service]On 2009/06/24 0:40, Erik Wilde wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:23:24 +0200, Dan Brickley <danbri@...> >> wrote: >>> Fwd'ing to uri@... from the SW IG list. Can anyone here advise? It >>> would also be interesting to hear about the state of URI validation >>> libraries, even if they're not currently exposed as Web Services. >> Validator.nu does IRI reference validation for attributes that take >> them as value. > > http://uriparser.sourceforge.net/ and other URI parser implementations > are an option. submitting a URI would be easy, but the question is what > to return: just a (URI|IRI|invalid) response, or some sort of parsing > result that can be used to process the URI? the latter option might be > interesting beyond mere validation, but then again URI parsing is such a > low-level task that in most cases, people will probably prefer to have > it as a local library, instead of using a web service. What is more, the general grammar for URIs (or IRIs) is extremely loose, because it has to accommodate many different schemes. Validating by scheme can be more strict, but this means that data for each scheme has to be collected; this data may not be available easily and uniformly. Regards, Martin. -- #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@... |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |