This is probably similar to my earlier confusion about mono-ruby with
more than three ruby characters [1].
The second paragraph of Section 3.3.7, "Positioning of Jukugo-ruby with
Respect to Base Characters", begins:
If there is any kanji character in a given kanji compound word which
needs more than three ruby characters, the jukugo-ruby layout cannot
be used.
However, the alternative methods in Fig. 130 and Fig. 131 are both
described as jukugo-ruby and both show three or fewer ruby characters
per kanji.
1. Should "jukugo-ruby" in the first sentence be "mono-ruby"?
2. It's not clear to me whether the examples in Fig. 131 are correct for
both nakatsuki-ruby and katatsuki-ruby or whether only katatsuki-ruby
is being illustrated in this figure.
3. Who or what decides whether the maximum overhang over another base
character is either a full character width or one and a half times
the full-width of a ruby character?
Regards,
Tony Graham
Tony.Graham@...
Director W3C XSL FO SG Invited Expert
Menteith Consulting Ltd XML Guild member
XML, XSL and XSLT consulting, programming and training
Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland
Registered in Ireland - No. 428599
http://www.menteithconsulting.com -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
xmlroff XSL Formatter
http://xmlroff.orgxslide Emacs mode
http://www.menteith.com/wiki/xslideUnicode: A Primer urn:isbn:0-7645-4625-2
[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2009Jul/0002.html[2]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-jlreq-20090604/#en-subheading2_3_7
