[MacPorts] #22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
|
View:
New views
7 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
[MacPorts] #22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
by MacPorts
::
Rate this Message:
#22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
-----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Reporter: akitada@… | Owner: mcalhoun@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.1 Keywords: setuptools distribute | Port: -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- See: http://old.nabble.com/Future-of-setuptools-and-distribute-in- MacPorts-td25790661.html -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/22403> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS _______________________________________________ macports-tickets mailing list macports-tickets@... http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-tickets |
|
|
Re: [MacPorts] #22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
by MacPorts
::
Rate this Message:
#22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
-----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Reporter: akitada@… | Owner: mcalhoun@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.1 Keywords: setuptools distribute | Port: -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Comment(by jmr@…): If I understand what you're suggesting here, why would we not just make setuptools replaced_by distribute? -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/22403#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS _______________________________________________ macports-tickets mailing list macports-tickets@... http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-tickets |
|
|
Re: [MacPorts] #22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
by MacPorts
::
Rate this Message:
#22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
-----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Reporter: akitada@… | Owner: mcalhoun@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.1 Keywords: setuptools distribute | Port: -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Comment(by akitada@…): Replying to [comment:1 jmr@…]: > If I understand what you're suggesting here, why would we not just make setuptools replaced_by distribute? Because I think setuptools and distribute ports should be kept as different ports for up coming Distribute 0.7 release. Distribute 0.7 is, unline 0.6, going to drop setuptools compatibility. I propose to use name "setuptools" for Distribute 0.6 and "distribute" for Distribute 0.7. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/22403#comment:2> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS _______________________________________________ macports-tickets mailing list macports-tickets@... http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-tickets |
|
|
Re: [MacPorts] #22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
by MacPorts
::
Rate this Message:
#22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
-----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Reporter: akitada@… | Owner: mcalhoun@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.1 Keywords: setuptools distribute | Port: -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Comment(by macports.org@…): Why not {{{distribute0.6}}} for Distribute 0.6 and {{{distribute}}} for >= 0.7? There are people who (still) want to actual setuptools, not distribute, because they feel it's been better tested and they're not confident in distribute yet. Furthermore, since he's been threatened of irrelevance PJE has started working on Setuptools again. As a result, I really don't think setuptools's code should just be replaced by distribute's in the {{{setuptools}}} port. Plus it'd be a lie. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/22403#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS _______________________________________________ macports-tickets mailing list macports-tickets@... http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-tickets |
|
|
Re: [MacPorts] #22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
by MacPorts
::
Rate this Message:
#22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
-----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Reporter: akitada@… | Owner: mcalhoun@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.1 Keywords: setuptools distribute | Port: -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Comment(by akitada@…): Replying to [comment:3 macports.org@…]: > Why not {{{distribute0.6}}} for Distribute 0.6 and {{{distribute}}} for >= 0.7? > > There are people who (still) want to actual setuptools, not distribute, because they feel it's been better tested and they're not confident in distribute yet. Furthermore, since he's been threatened of irrelevance PJE has started working on Setuptools again. > > As a result, I really don't think setuptools's code should just be replaced by distribute's in the {{{setuptools}}} port. Plus it'd be a lie. Distribute *is* a lie and but it's a good one. Do you have any specific issues that Distribute fails but setuptools just works? setuptools port has been already spreaded in MacPorts and I think it's the easiest way of providing better software to users. (Let me say this again. Yes, you're right. it's a lie) -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/22403#comment:5> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS _______________________________________________ macports-tickets mailing list macports-tickets@... http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-tickets |
|
|
Re: [MacPorts] #22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
by MacPorts
::
Rate this Message:
#22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
-----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Reporter: akitada@… | Owner: mcalhoun@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.1 Keywords: setuptools distribute | Port: -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Comment(by macports.org@…): > Distribute *is* a lie and but it's a good one. Yes and no. Distribute is a fork exposing a setuptools module, but you know what when you're installing *distribute*. What if people install this distribute-renamed-to-setuptools and start sending feedback to setuptools on that subject? What sense does it make? > Do you have any specific issues that Distribute fails but setuptools just works? Me? No, I'm just echoing feedback I've found on the distutils, distribute and setuptools mailing lists. > I think it's the easiest way of providing better software to users. That's all fine and dandy, but it shouldn't be done by telling users that distribute is setuptools. It's not. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/22403#comment:6> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS _______________________________________________ macports-tickets mailing list macports-tickets@... http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-tickets |
|
|
Re: [MacPorts] #22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
by MacPorts
::
Rate this Message:
#22403: 'distribute' under the name of 'setuptools'
-----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Reporter: akitada@… | Owner: mcalhoun@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.1 Keywords: setuptools distribute | Port: -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Comment(by akitada@…): > Yes and no. Distribute is a fork exposing a setuptools module, but you know what when you're installing *distribute*. What if people install this distribute-renamed-to-setuptools and start sending feedback to setuptools on that subject? What sense does it make? I checked with Tarek, who's the core developer of distirubute and the maintainer of Distribute itself. He said he watches setuptools bug queue so if sending feedback to setputools on distribute actually helpful. > > Do you have any specific issues that Distribute fails but setuptools just works? > > Me? No, I'm just echoing feedback I've found on the distutils, distribute and setuptools mailing lists. Well, I think I can pick some of the issues in setuptools that's fixed on distribute, if you like. > > I think it's the easiest way of providing better software to users. > > That's all fine and dandy, but it shouldn't be done by telling users that distribute is setuptools. It's not. I understand your concern, but I still think this would makes users happier. Apparently I'm not the only who think it's better. This strategy is actually what Debian and Gentoo do for their package. (Ubuntu will be soon) * http://packages.gentoo.org/package/dev-python/setuptools * http://packages.debian.org/sid/python-setuptools I'd like to hear from setuptools/distribute MacPorts port maintainers on this. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/22403#comment:7> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS _______________________________________________ macports-tickets mailing list macports-tickets@... http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-tickets |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
