[PATCH] sparc,sparc64: replace parentheses in pmul()

[Roel Kluin-2]

`>>' has a higher precedence than `?' so src2 evaluated to
either 16 or 0 dependent on the bits set in rs2.

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...>
---
 arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

I am not 100% sure that the code was incorrect, however, if it
was intended I think it is a very strange way to write it.

Roel

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c
index b956fd7..d231cbd 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static void pmul(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int insn, unsigned int opf)
  rs2 = fps_regval(f, RS2(insn));
 
  rd_val = 0;
- src2 = (rs2 >> (opf == FMUL8x16AU_OPF) ? 16 : 0);
+ src2 = rs2 >> (opf == FMUL8x16AU_OPF ? 16 : 0);
  for (byte = 0; byte < 4; byte++) {
  u16 src1 = (rs1 >> (byte * 8)) & 0x00ff;
  u32 prod = src1 * src2;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[David Miller-13]

From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:40:44 +0100

> `>>' has a higher precedence than `?' so src2 evaluated to
> either 16 or 0 dependent on the bits set in rs2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...>
> ---
>  arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> I am not 100% sure that the code was incorrect, however, if it
> was intended I think it is a very strange way to write it.

Your fix is correct, thanks Roel!

I really need to write a testsuite for this VIS emulation code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/