|
View:
New views
10 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
| < Prev | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 | Next > |
|
|
Re: [GIT-PULL] includecheck fixesHello James,
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 03:22 +0000, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 08:29 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > Hello Greg, > > > > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 15:26 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:10:09AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > > > Linus, > > > > > > > > Please pull includecheck fixes, these all are clean and safe patches > > > > with relevant Acks. > > > > > > Shouldn't stuff like this go through the trivial tree? And stuff like > > > that is relevant for the main pre-rc1 merge, not this late in the merge > > > cycle, right? > > > > > > > You did not specified what is your problem ? and where was you when we > > discussed it earlier ? > > The problem, as you have been told several times, is that maintainers > are very busy people and don't necessarily have time to deal with > mechanical replacement trivia like this. > Am I asking you ? If you are very busy and not able to handle things properly, so better quit the maintainer-ship. Others can handle more better than you. > The point is that Jiri Kosina takes that burden on himself to verify and > submit the changes like this, so something like this should go through > him. > Who will take burden of Jiri, I already send another PULL request to Jiri. > > Normally brain is above then the eyes, do you know why ? > > > > To use your brain instead of follow things blindly. > > > > The point of watching patches for some time means test and wait so that > > they can show their real faces. > > Abusing people who do real work, particularly when you manifestly do > not, is a gross breach of etiquette ... welcome to my killfile. > So what you mean, you can do any crap and no one can blame you ... welcome to my killknife. -- JSR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |
|
|
Re: [GIT-PULL] includecheck fixesOn Thu, 2009-07-09 at 20:35 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:29:15AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > Hello Greg, > > > > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 15:26 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:10:09AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > > > Linus, > > > > > > > > Please pull includecheck fixes, these all are clean and safe patches > > > > with relevant Acks. > > > > > > Shouldn't stuff like this go through the trivial tree? And stuff like > > > that is relevant for the main pre-rc1 merge, not this late in the merge > > > cycle, right? > > > > > > > You did not specified what is your problem ? and where was you when we > > discussed it earlier ? > > Earlier when? Check LKML emails of this thread, I have send half-dozen of emails to you earlier. Thanks, -- JSR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/44] includecheck: fix multiple includesOn Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:58:31AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 22:13 +0100, Russell King wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:30:59PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > > I am still waiting ACK/NAK for : > > > > > > includecheck fix: arm, misc.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, atomic.h > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-dm355-evm.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-dm355-leopard.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-dm644x-evm.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-dm646x-evm.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-sffsdr.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, mach-mx3/devices.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, mach-omap1/mcbsp.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, mach-omap2/mcbsp.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, plat-s3c64xx/pm.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, plat-stmp3xxx/pinmux.c For mach-mx3/devices.c: Acked-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...> -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/44] includecheck: fix multiple includesHello all,
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 23:30 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > Hello all, > > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 19:58 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > The following changes since commit faf80d62e44dc627efb741f48db50c1858d1667c: > > Linus Torvalds (1): > > Merge branch 'x86-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/.../tip/linux-2.6-tip > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/headers-check-2.6.git master > > > > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (44): > > This is a big patchset, so it will be better that either me or Sam will > send it to Linus after collecting ACKs. > I am still waiting ACK/NAK for : > Thanks for all your ACKs and support. Sorry guys, I give up and do not want to hear more crap from crapy people just for nothing and withdrawing pull request. If you want, apply these patches or just trashed it. Thanks, -- JSR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |
|
|
Re: [PATCH 20/44] includecheck fix: x86, shadow.cOn Thu, 2009-07-09 at 21:01 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Thomas Gleixner<tglx@...> wrote: > > > Can we stop this kindergarden already? The patch is so obvious that it > > > just should be applied. I'll pick up all x86 ones and fold them in. > > > > What kindergarten are you talking about? Technically Ingo "kicked" > > kmemcheck out of the x86 tree so the patch should go through > > kmemcheck.git which makes Cyrill's CC correction spot on. > > I'm referring to the fact that these changes are so obvious that we do > neither need dozens separate commits nor the ack of everyone plus some > more. My inbox is full enough already. > Hey kindergarten kid, What the hell you are talking about, I did not send even one email to you. Hey kid here is your today's lesson: If you and your inbox is upset with x86 maintainers <x86@...> emails then quit x86 maintainer-ship. If you and your inbox is upset with LKML emails then quit LKML. If you upset with life then ... -- JSR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |
|
|
Re: [PATCH 20/44] includecheck fix: x86, shadow.cOn Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Jaswinder Singh
Rajput<jaswinder@...> wrote: > Hey kindergarten kid, > > What the hell you are talking about, I did not send even one email to > you. > > Hey kid here is your today's lesson: > > If you and your inbox is upset with x86 maintainers <x86@...> > emails then quit x86 maintainer-ship. > > If you and your inbox is upset with LKML emails then quit LKML. > > If you upset with life then ... Jaswinder, you might want wait for few days to calm down before writing more emails on LKML. Yes, I do realize you're upset after Ingo stopped nurturing your patches. But in the last 24 hours, you've told two Linux kernel maintainers to quit (and insulted them in the process) which is bit over the top, wouldn't you agree? If you continue doing this, I suspect you will end up in more killfiles and have all your patches ignored. Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |
|
|
Re: [GIT-PULL] includecheck fixesOn Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > > > Please pull includecheck fixes, these all are clean and safe > > > > > patches with relevant Acks. > > > > Shouldn't stuff like this go through the trivial tree? And stuff > > > > like that is relevant for the main pre-rc1 merge, not this late in > > > > the merge cycle, right? > > > You did not specified what is your problem ? and where was you when > > > we discussed it earlier ? > > The problem, as you have been told several times, is that maintainers > > are very busy people and don't necessarily have time to deal with > > mechanical replacement trivia like this. > Am I asking you ? If you are very busy and not able to handle things > properly, so better quit the maintainer-ship. Others can handle more > better than you. Come on Jaswinder ... trivial grammar/typo fixes are really not that important stuff to argue about in longish threads. Let's rather find a more interesting and important topic to flame each other about :) This is really not worth it. > > The point is that Jiri Kosina takes that burden on himself to verify > > and submit the changes like this, so something like this should go > > through him. > Who will take burden of Jiri, I already send another PULL request to > Jiri. If you mean the "foo foo" replacement request, the repository you asked me to pull from doesn't seem to have any extra patches on top of current tree, so I guess you forgot to push. Also you can't expect that I react to trivial patches very promptly. There are a lot of more urgent things that I am taking care of, this is just an "add-on". Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |
|
|
Re: [PATCH 17/44] includecheck fix: um, helper.cOn Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:25:50PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> >fix the following 'make includecheck' warning: > > arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c: linux/limits.h is included more than once. > >Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...> >--- > arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c | 1 - > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c >index 30860b8..b6b1096 100644 >--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c >+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c >@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ > #include "os.h" > #include "um_malloc.h" > #include "user.h" >-#include <linux/limits.h> > > struct helper_data { > void (*pre_exec)(void*); Definitely yes. Acked-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/44] includecheck: fix multiple includesOn Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 06:28:31AM +0200, ext Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 22:13 +0100, Russell King wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:30:59PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > > I am still waiting ACK/NAK for : > > > > > > includecheck fix: arm, misc.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, atomic.h > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-dm355-evm.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-dm355-leopard.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-dm644x-evm.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-dm646x-evm.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-sffsdr.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, mach-mx3/devices.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, mach-omap1/mcbsp.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, mach-omap2/mcbsp.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, plat-s3c64xx/pm.c > > > includecheck fix: arm, plat-stmp3xxx/pinmux.c > > > > You're still waiting because apparantly you never sent this set anywhere > > near any ARM people before. > > > > For the first two, I'll ack them: > > > > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...> > > > > The remainder look sane to me, but you'll have to seek acks from the > > individual platform maintainer(s). > > > > OK, adding some more ARM people and ARM lists to get remaining ACK/NAK. > > Patches are already posted to LKML and also available at : > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/headers-check-2.6.git;a=summary > > In case if you are not able to find these patches let me know. > > Thanks, In behalf of mach-omap[1,2]/mcbsp.c: Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...> > -- > JSR > -- Eduardo Valentin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/44] includecheck: fix multiple includesHello all,
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 17:45 +0300, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 06:28:31AM +0200, ext Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 22:13 +0100, Russell King wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:30:59PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > > > I am still waiting ACK/NAK for : > > > > > > > > includecheck fix: arm, misc.c > > > > includecheck fix: arm, atomic.h > > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-dm355-evm.c > > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-dm355-leopard.c > > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-dm644x-evm.c > > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-dm646x-evm.c > > > > includecheck fix: arm, board-sffsdr.c > > > > includecheck fix: arm, mach-mx3/devices.c > > > > includecheck fix: arm, mach-omap1/mcbsp.c > > > > includecheck fix: arm, mach-omap2/mcbsp.c > > > > includecheck fix: arm, plat-s3c64xx/pm.c > > > > includecheck fix: arm, plat-stmp3xxx/pinmux.c > > > > > > You're still waiting because apparantly you never sent this set anywhere > > > near any ARM people before. > > > > > > For the first two, I'll ack them: > > > > > > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...> > > > > > > The remainder look sane to me, but you'll have to seek acks from the > > > individual platform maintainer(s). > > > > > > > OK, adding some more ARM people and ARM lists to get remaining ACK/NAK. > > > > Patches are already posted to LKML and also available at : > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/headers-check-2.6.git;a=summary > > > > In case if you are not able to find these patches let me know. > > > > Thanks, > > In behalf of mach-omap[1,2]/mcbsp.c: > > Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...> > These patches are still not applied anywhere, If you want you can apply respective patch in your respective trees. Thanks, -- JSR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |
| < Prev | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 | Next > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |