[RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell
|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
| < Prev | 1 - 2 | Next > |
 |
Re: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell
by Alexandre Poitras
::
Rate this Message:
Oh sorry I was sure it was when you have a timestamp in your filename.
Maybe I should test it again. Anyway, I just think there should a big note on the web site about this issue somewhere until the new version is released because it's really confusing at first. I spent a lot of time figuring out why Maven wasn't downloading the newer snapshots. On 9/18/06, Brett Porter <brett@...> wrote: > That's the opposite to what you keep saying. It's when you *don't* > have a timestamp in the version number. > > I could have sworn John fixed this recently, though... > > On 19/09/2006, at 1:16 AM, Alexandre Poitras wrote: > > > That's the real one : > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1908 > > > > On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <alexandre.poitras@...> wrote: > >> Oops wrong one, forget the last email. > >> > >> On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <alexandre.poitras@...> wrote: > >> > Here's the issue I am speaking about : > >> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2289 > >> > > >> > On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <alexandre.poitras@...> wrote: > >> > > I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I > >> > > can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its > >> filename > >> > > or I won't get the last version. I remember Brett couple of > >> months ago > >> > > saying this feature wasn't implemented yet. I'll try to find > >> the JIRA > >> > > issue. > >> > > > >> > > This is definitely a showstopper when you don't know about it. > >> > > > >> > > On 9/17/06, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@...> wrote: > >> > > > On 9/17/06, Alexandre Poitras <alexandre.poitras@...> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Another thing I would like to see fixed is the snapshot > >> apache > >> > > > > repository. Nighlty builds are still deployed using a > >> unique version > >> > > > > identifier. This feature doesn't work and this is why a > >> lot of people > >> > > > > have trouble when it's come to snapshot dependencies. > >> > > > > >> > > > Do you mean *without* a unique version identifier here? > >> > > > > >> > > > This is the 'Maven 2.0.4 will not download a x.x- > >> SNAPSHOT.jar if one > >> > > > is already present in the local repository' problem, correct? > >> > > > > >> > > > It would be nice if it would deploy both a uniquely named > >> version > >> > > > _and_ the x.x.x-SNAPSHOT.jar. The projects I'm involved with > >> have > >> > > > uniqueVersion set to false for that reason. > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Wendy > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell
by davidkarlsen
::
Rate this Message:
Alexandre Poitras wrote:
> I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I > can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its filename > or I won't get the last version. I remember Brett couple of months ago > saying this feature wasn't implemented yet. I'll try to find the JIRA > issue. > > This is definitely a showstopper when you don't know about it. Did you set up the repo as a <snapshots>enabled</snapshots> one? > > On 9/17/06, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@...> wrote: >> On 9/17/06, Alexandre Poitras <alexandre.poitras@...> wrote: >> >> > Another thing I would like to see fixed is the snapshot apache >> > repository. Nighlty builds are still deployed using a unique version >> > identifier. This feature doesn't work and this is why a lot of people >> > have trouble when it's come to snapshot dependencies. >> >> Do you mean *without* a unique version identifier here? >> >> This is the 'Maven 2.0.4 will not download a x.x-SNAPSHOT.jar if one >> is already present in the local repository' problem, correct? >> >> It would be nice if it would deploy both a uniquely named version >> _and_ the x.x.x-SNAPSHOT.jar. The projects I'm involved with have >> uniqueVersion set to false for that reason. >> >> -- >> Wendy >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > -- David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43 http://www.davidkarlsen.com http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell
by Alexandre Poitras
::
Rate this Message:
Yup it works now but I remember it took me a lot of time to make it happen.
On 9/18/06, David J. M. Karlsen <david@...> wrote: > Alexandre Poitras wrote: > > I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I > > can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its filename > > or I won't get the last version. I remember Brett couple of months ago > > saying this feature wasn't implemented yet. I'll try to find the JIRA > > issue. > > > > This is definitely a showstopper when you don't know about it. > Did you set up the repo as a <snapshots>enabled</snapshots> one? > > > > On 9/17/06, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@...> wrote: > >> On 9/17/06, Alexandre Poitras <alexandre.poitras@...> wrote: > >> > >> > Another thing I would like to see fixed is the snapshot apache > >> > repository. Nighlty builds are still deployed using a unique version > >> > identifier. This feature doesn't work and this is why a lot of people > >> > have trouble when it's come to snapshot dependencies. > >> > >> Do you mean *without* a unique version identifier here? > >> > >> This is the 'Maven 2.0.4 will not download a x.x-SNAPSHOT.jar if one > >> is already present in the local repository' problem, correct? > >> > >> It would be nice if it would deploy both a uniquely named version > >> _and_ the x.x.x-SNAPSHOT.jar. The projects I'm involved with have > >> uniqueVersion set to false for that reason. > >> > >> -- > >> Wendy > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > > > > -- > David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43 > http://www.davidkarlsen.com > http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
| < Prev | 1 - 2 | Next > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
