[RDFa TC] Roadmap for approval

View: New views
5 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

[RDFa TC] Roadmap for approval

by Hausenblas, Michael :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



Elias, Fabien, Ben, Shane, Wing,

As of my action [1], I'm now going to start the
approval preparation of the RDFa TC.

The three appointed implementers (Elias, Fabien, Ben - 3I for short ;)
should have a look at the proposed plan as described below.
The 3I are asked to i) confirm their availability, and
ii) comment on the necessary steps to be taken:

1. The host languages features are summarised in [2].
Please have a _critical_ look at this Wiki page (Shane?).
This matrix will get an integral part of the RDFa Test Suite [3].

2. The next step is the partitioning of the TC along
HTML4/XHTML1.1/XHTML2.0, which basically means to create three
RDF manifest documents, along with a matrix that summarises the
applicable tests.

Wing, can you confirm this, please?

3. We start with test approval for the XHTML1.1+RDFa partition.
The idea is to have this ready by next telecon on 23. April 2007.
This requires that each of the 3I runs all the selected TC in the
according environment (WS/JS/XSLT), and reports conformance and
any troubles with the TC execution.


My proposed time schedule looks as follows.

Till Wed, 18 April:
We (Wing and I) work on the partitioning.

Till Thu, 19 April:
The 3I go through the Test Suite [3] and
tell if it is possible for them to actually
perform the tests.

Till Mon, 23 April:
The 3I report on the mailing list about the
results on the tests. These will be gathered in
a first step on a Wiki page; after approval the
results are published as an (non-normative)
implementation report (cf. [4])


Cheers,
        Michael

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/16-rdfa-minutes.html#action13
[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaInHTML
[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/
[4] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/01/test-faq#results

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
 Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA

 <office>
    phone: +43-316-876-1193 (fax:-1191)  
   e-mail: michael.hausenblas@...
      web: http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ 

 <private>
   mobile: +43-660-7621761
      web: http://www.sw-app.org/ 
----------------------------------------------------------


Re: [RDFa TC] Roadmap for approval

by Fabien Gandon :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Hausenblas, Michael:
> Till Thu, 19 April:
> The 3I go through the Test Suite [3] and
> tell if it is possible for them to actually
> perform the tests.
>  
I'll try to do it but since I have a meeting Thursday and Friday that
may be hard for me.

> Till Mon, 23 April:
> The 3I report on the mailing list about the
> results on the tests. These will be gathered in
> a first step on a Wiki page; after approval the
> results are published as an (non-normative)
> implementation report (cf. [4])
>  
OK, I can try do run tests over the week-end.

Do you intend to use EARL for reporting?
http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/
The schema is here
http://www.w3.org/ns/earl

--
Fabien - http://www.inria.fr/acacia/fabien/



Re: [RDFa TC] Roadmap for approval

by Shane McCarron :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


I note that the wiki references the member-private editors draft of
xhtml-rdfa.  You should reference
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts/xhtml-rdfa - that URI will remain
pointed at the current editors draft in public space.

>  

--
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@...




RE: [RDFa TC] Roadmap for approval

by Hausenblas, Michael :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



>I note that the wiki references the member-private editors draft of
>xhtml-rdfa.  You should reference
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts/xhtml-rdfa 
>that URI will remain pointed at the current editors draft in public
space.

Fixed. That was an easy one ;)

Thanks, Shane!

Cheers,
        Michael

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
 
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
 



RE: [RDFa TC] Roadmap for approval

by Hausenblas, Michael :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



Fabien,

>> Till Thu, 19 April:
>> The 3I go through the Test Suite [3] and
>> tell if it is possible for them to actually
>> perform the tests.
>>  
>I'll try to do it but since I have a meeting Thursday
>and Friday that may be hard for me.
>
>> Till Mon, 23 April:
>> The 3I report on the mailing list about the
>> results on the tests. These will be gathered in
>> a first step on a Wiki page; after approval the
>> results are published as an (non-normative)
>> implementation report (cf. [4])
>>  
>OK, I can try do run tests over the week-end.

Excellent :)

>Do you intend to use EARL for reporting?
>http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/
>The schema is here
>http://www.w3.org/ns/earl

Well, I actually proposed it some time ago [1],
but didn't get _much_ response.

IMHO it is a good idea to implement it - it's rather
a little effort, and reminds us to 'eat the own dog food' ;)

Cheers,
        Michael

[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Mar/0106.
html

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
 
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------