[Tnfox-discussion] Re: [Foxgui-users]Wait till system() ends?

[Niall Douglas]

On 25 Feb 2006 at 9:34, The Devils Jester wrote:

> TnFOX SVN fails with:
>
>
> #####################################
> In file included from include/FXProcess.h:27,
>                  from include/QThread.h:25,
>                  from src/QThread.cxx:23:
> include/FXGenericTools.h:431: warning: all member functions in class `
>    FX::Generic::ptr<type, ownershipPolicy>::Tester' are private
> include/FXGenericTools.h:1518: warning: all member functions in class `
>    FX::Generic::Functor<parslist>::Tester' are private
> In file included from include/qvaluelist.h:34,
>                  from src/QThread.cxx:38:
> include/FXStream.h:505: warning: all member functions in class `
>    FX::Generic::hasSerialise<type>' are private
> include/FXStream.h:517: warning: all member functions in class `
>    FX::Generic::hasDeserialise<type>' are private

All of the above can be fixed by moving to a newer GCC than 3.3. It's
just GCC being braindead.

> src/QThread.cxx:1143:42: missing terminating ' character
> scons: *** [Release_g++_x86_4/QThread.os] Error 1
> scons: building terminated because of errors.
> ########################################

In my QThread.cxx, line 1143 is a #error Unknown POSIX architecture.
Again, I think it's GCC 3.3 being braindead and misparsing the ' in
the "don't".

Try GCC 3.4 or 4.0.2. I use 4.0.2. 3.4 is a lot faster to compile
than 3.3 too ...

Cheers,
Niall





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Tnfox-discussion mailing list
Tnfox-discussion@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tnfox-discussion

[Niall Douglas]

On 25 Feb 2006 at 19:55, The Devils Jester wrote:

> Using 4.0.x would be a last resort, not because I dislike it, but because
> many of my testers do not have linux, they use Knoppix and friends which do
> not come with the newer dependancies that an app compiled with 4.0.x would
> require.  Same goes even for my real linux testers, most of their distros
> are still in the 3.x.x branch.  In the first case its not an option to
> install a new version, and in the second its a pain for them.

Well 3.4 comes with many improvements over 3.3, even more than 3.4 to
4.0. If you can move to it. If not, that's fine, just send me a
complete list of all errors with 3.3 and I'll do the very minor
surgery required.

> As far as a port from FOX to TnFOX the only big problem I will have is a
> File Dialog (last I checked TnFOX didnt have one), which isnt a huge issue,
> the one in FOX is horrible so I was planning a custom one anyway...

No, TnFOX has all the GUI classes FOX does, including its
FXFileDialog.

Cheers,
Niall





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Tnfox-discussion mailing list
Tnfox-discussion@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tnfox-discussion