[Trinidad 2.0] Ordering of artifacts (sec 11.4.7 in the JSF 2.0 spec)

[Matthias Wessendorf-4]

Hi,

for adding support for 11.4.7, I am proposing we introduce a unique
ID/NAME for the Apache MyFaces Trinidad library

I think that we want something like this (to be added to the
faces-config-base.xml):
<faces-config>

  <name>
    org.apache.myfaces.trinidad
  </name>
...

</faces-config>

Not sure if we want something like

"org.apache.myfaces.trinidad" versus "org.apache.myfaces.TRINIDAD"...

I am (personally) fine with "org.apache.myfaces.trinidad"

-Matthias

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

[Matthias Wessendorf-4]

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1603

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@...> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> for adding support for 11.4.7, I am proposing we introduce a unique
> ID/NAME for the Apache MyFaces Trinidad library
>
> I think that we want something like this (to be added to the
> faces-config-base.xml):
> <faces-config>
>
>  <name>
>    org.apache.myfaces.trinidad
>  </name>
> ...
>
> </faces-config>
>
> Not sure if we want something like
>
> "org.apache.myfaces.trinidad" versus "org.apache.myfaces.TRINIDAD"...
>
> I am (personally) fine with "org.apache.myfaces.trinidad"
>
> -Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

[Andy Schwartz]

Hey Matthias -

I like "org.apache.myfaces.trinidad".

Just out of curiosity I sent email to the EG to see what other folks
have done.  I don't think we need to wait for that info, but I will
pass along any responses.

Andy

[Matthias Wessendorf-4]

As there are some limitations (see TRINIDAD-1603) and picking an ugly one, like

<faces-config>

 <name>
   org_apache_myfaces_trinidad
 </name>
...

</faces-config>

doesn't make much sense, what do folks think about picking a
simplified version ?

<faces-config>
 <name>
   trinidad
 </name>
...
</faces-config>

There shouldn't be much issues with "trinidad" as the (kinda) unique name...

Thoughts ?

-Matthias


On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Andy Schwartz
<andy.g.schwartz@...> wrote:

> Hey Matthias -
>
> I like "org.apache.myfaces.trinidad".
>
> Just out of curiosity I sent email to the EG to see what other folks
> have done.  I don't think we need to wait for that info, but I will
> pass along any responses.
>
> Andy
>

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

[Matthias Wessendorf-4]

Ok...

they moved the BUG to be SPEC specific, which means (to my understanding)
that this won't be solved in the near future. See the spec ticket here:

https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=662

as there was no veto on using "trinidad", I committed it to the source;
There shouldn't be big issues with that ... and if they fix the behavior,
we can always change it and release note the issue, but I guess there
is almost on problem with that...

-Matthias

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@...> wrote:

> As there are some limitations (see TRINIDAD-1603) and picking an ugly one, like
>
> <faces-config>
>
>  <name>
>   org_apache_myfaces_trinidad
>  </name>
> ...
>
> </faces-config>
>
> doesn't make much sense, what do folks think about picking a
> simplified version ?
>
> <faces-config>
>  <name>
>   trinidad
>  </name>
> ...
> </faces-config>
>
> There shouldn't be much issues with "trinidad" as the (kinda) unique name...
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Andy Schwartz
> <andy.g.schwartz@...> wrote:
>> Hey Matthias -
>>
>> I like "org.apache.myfaces.trinidad".
>>
>> Just out of curiosity I sent email to the EG to see what other folks
>> have done.  I don't think we need to wait for that info, but I will
>> pass along any responses.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf