[VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

View: New views
5 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  
< Prev | 1 - 2 | Next >

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

by Benjamin Bentmann :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

John Casey wrote:

> Okay, I'm retracting this vote to fix:
>
> MNG-4210
> MNG-4213

As a suggestion, probably worth to consider merging MNG-4179 in from the
2.2.x branch as well.


Benjamin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

by brettporter :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On 20/06/2009, at 2:29 AM, Brian Fox wrote:

> This is probably a rare situation but does present itself like a
> regression. On the flip side, I would love to be able to enable
> pre-emptive authentication but I would want to do it per server. This
> would have the effect of halving the requests and upload data for
> authenticated servers, but we shouldn't do it by default.

If this is added as a configuration parameter of the HTTP wagon in the  
next release it'll be configurable per-server.

- Brett


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

by John Casey-5 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

done. I'll finish up the log4j stuff this morning and hopefully have a
new RC out for testing this afternoon.

Benjamin Bentmann wrote:

> John Casey wrote:
>
>> Okay, I'm retracting this vote to fix:
>>
>> MNG-4210
>> MNG-4213
>
> As a suggestion, probably worth to consider merging MNG-4179 in from the
> 2.2.x branch as well.
>
>
> Benjamin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

by John Casey-5 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I've added this sort of configuration, but I need to document it. I've
got a proposed next release of wagon staged, and as soon as I get the
documentation for this configuration done, I'll call the vote.

-john

Brett Porter wrote:

>
> On 20/06/2009, at 2:29 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
>
>> This is probably a rare situation but does present itself like a
>> regression. On the flip side, I would love to be able to enable
>> pre-emptive authentication but I would want to do it per server. This
>> would have the effect of halving the requests and upload data for
>> authenticated servers, but we shouldn't do it by default.
>
> If this is added as a configuration parameter of the HTTP wagon in the
> next release it'll be configurable per-server.
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

by nicolas de loof-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Just as a side note, I don't thing the wiki page
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+2.2.0+Release+Plan is up to
date with current release candidate, is it ?
Nicolas

2009/6/22 John Casey <jdcasey@...>

> I've added this sort of configuration, but I need to document it. I've got
> a proposed next release of wagon staged, and as soon as I get the
> documentation for this configuration done, I'll call the vote.
>
> -john
>
>
> Brett Porter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 20/06/2009, at 2:29 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
>>
>>  This is probably a rare situation but does present itself like a
>>> regression. On the flip side, I would love to be able to enable
>>> pre-emptive authentication but I would want to do it per server. This
>>> would have the effect of halving the requests and upload data for
>>> authenticated servers, but we shouldn't do it by default.
>>>
>>
>> If this is added as a configuration parameter of the HTTP wagon in the
>> next release it'll be configurable per-server.
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>
>
< Prev | 1 - 2 | Next >