[VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
|
View:
New views
13 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
[VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
by Edward J. Yoon-2
::
Rate this Message:
Hi,
I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/files/KEYS Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license headers. I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! I hope this will be a final, and +1. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
by sebb-2-2
::
Rate this Message:
On 20 February 2012 13:54, Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@...> wrote:
> Hi, > > I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes > the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. > > Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/files/KEYS > Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ There are no hashes (MD5 or SHA1). AIUI these are required. No need to respin the release, but please create the hashes. > Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ > NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt > LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt > Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ > > You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license headers. > > I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 > nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. > > Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! > > I hope this will be a final, and +1. > > Thanks. > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
by Edward J. Yoon-2
::
Rate this Message:
Thanks. I've created hash files.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:44 AM, sebb <sebbaz@...> wrote: > On 20 February 2012 13:54, Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@...> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes >> the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. >> >> Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/files/KEYS >> Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ > > There are no hashes (MD5 or SHA1). > AIUI these are required. > No need to respin the release, but please create the hashes. > >> Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ >> NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt >> LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt >> Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ >> >> You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license headers. >> >> I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 >> nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. >> >> Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! >> >> I hope this will be a final, and +1. >> >> Thanks. >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> @eddieyoon >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
by Edward J. Yoon-2
::
Rate this Message:
Vote please.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@...> wrote: > This RC6 has passed, with three +1 votes from Hama PPMC members. > > And now we're waiting your votes. > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Chia-Hung Lin <clin4j@...> wrote: >> +1 >> >> `mvn apache-rat:check` build success >> testing on 4 vms works >> md5sum passes the check >> sha1sum passes the check >> >> On 21 February 2012 18:06, Thomas Jungblut >> <thomas.jungblut@...> wrote: >>> Signatures: >>> - GPG signatures matches (asc) >>> - md5 sums ok >>> - sha1 sums ok >>> >>> Build: >>> build is fine with maven, testcases pass (tar and zip) >>> >>> Examples: >>> Tested all examples on local/pseudodistributed and distributed mode >>> >>> Whirr: >>> started 3 EC2 instances with whirr and ran SSSP. >>> >>> The textToSeq utils also work as expected. >>> >>> Rat check also reveals that everything is ok. >>> >>> Sorry for the massive votes... >>> Come on and vote :) >>> >>> +1 (binding). >>> >>> >>> 2012/2/20 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@...> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes >>>> the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. >>>> >>>> Signing KEYS: >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/files/KEYS >>>> Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ >>>> Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ >>>> NOTICE.txt: >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt >>>> LICENSE.txt: >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt >>>> Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ >>>> >>>> You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license >>>> headers. >>>> >>>> I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 >>>> nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. >>>> >>>> Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! >>>> >>>> I hope this will be a final, and +1. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>>> @eddieyoon >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thomas Jungblut >>> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@...> > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
by Franklin, Matthew B.
::
Rate this Message:
-1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns noted
below. On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote: >Hi, > >I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes >the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. > >Signing KEYS: >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/fi >les/KEYS >Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? Also, you can stage your artifacts at http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own public html folder, but this is not required. >Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ >NOTICE.txt: >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt >LICENSE.txt: >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses which I don't see in your LICENSE file. >Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ > >You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license >headers. > >I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 >nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. > >Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! > >I hope this will be a final, and +1. > >Thanks. >-- >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >@eddieyoon > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
by Franklin, Matthew B.
::
Rate this Message:
For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release is
preferred [1]. This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that you should look at. [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-typ es On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote: >>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party >>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of >>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>which I >>> don't see in your LICENSE file. > >The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt >file contains the Apache license v2.0. > >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt > >I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it >again? Ant itself includes code under a separate license. Since your binary release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need to include its license. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE > >And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files. > >> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>trunk to >> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. > >I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not >tested enough yet. > >On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut ><thomas.jungblut@...> wrote: >> Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0 >>license. If >> we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until the >> overnext year. >> What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution? >> >> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>trunk to >> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. >> >> 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. <mfranklin@...> >> >>> -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns noted >>> below. >>> >>> On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote: >>> >>> >Hi, >>> > >>> >I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes >>> >the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. >>> > >>> >Signing KEYS: >>> > >>> >>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/ >>>fi >>> >les/KEYS >>> >Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ >>> >>> Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? >>> >>> Also, you can stage your artifacts at >>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own public >>> html folder, but this is not required. >>> >>> >Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ >>> >NOTICE.txt: >>> >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt >>> >LICENSE.txt: >>> >>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt >>> >>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party >>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of >>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>which I >>> don't see in your LICENSE file. >>> >>> >Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ >>> > >>> >You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license >>> >headers. >>> > >>> >I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 >>> >nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. >>> > >>> >Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! >>> > >>> >I hope this will be a final, and +1. >>> > >>> >Thanks. >>> >-- >>> >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>> >@eddieyoon >>> > >>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >>> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Jungblut >> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@...> > > > >-- >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >@eddieyoon > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
by Edward J. Yoon-2
::
Rate this Message:
Thanks. Actually we're trying to separate them but there's some issues
related with packaging web resources e.g., https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-494 If it's not a blocker, I'd like to fix this issue in the next release. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. <mfranklin@...> wrote: > For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release is > preferred [1]. This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that > you should look at. > > [1]: > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-typ > es > > On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote: > >>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party >>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of >>>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>>which I >>>> don't see in your LICENSE file. >> >>The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt >>file contains the Apache license v2.0. >> >>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt >> >>I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it >>again? > > > Ant itself includes code under a separate license. Since your binary > release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need to > include its license. > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE > > > >> >>And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files. >> >>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>>trunk to >>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. >> >>I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not >>tested enough yet. >> >>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut >><thomas.jungblut@...> wrote: >>> Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0 >>>license. If >>> we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until the >>> overnext year. >>> What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution? >>> >>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>>trunk to >>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. >>> >>> 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. <mfranklin@...> >>> >>>> -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns noted >>>> below. >>>> >>>> On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote: >>>> >>>> >Hi, >>>> > >>>> >I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes >>>> >the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. >>>> > >>>> >Signing KEYS: >>>> > >>>> >>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/ >>>>fi >>>> >les/KEYS >>>> >Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ >>>> >>>> Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? >>>> >>>> Also, you can stage your artifacts at >>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own public >>>> html folder, but this is not required. >>>> >>>> >Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ >>>> >NOTICE.txt: >>>> >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt >>>> >LICENSE.txt: >>>> >>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt >>>> >>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party >>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of >>>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>>which I >>>> don't see in your LICENSE file. >>>> >>>> >Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ >>>> > >>>> >You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license >>>> >headers. >>>> > >>>> >I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 >>>> >nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. >>>> > >>>> >Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! >>>> > >>>> >I hope this will be a final, and +1. >>>> > >>>> >Thanks. >>>> >-- >>>> >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>>> >@eddieyoon >>>> > >>>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >>>> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thomas Jungblut >>> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@...> >> >> >> >>-- >>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>@eddieyoon >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
by Franklin, Matthew B.
::
Rate this Message:
On 2/25/12 8:12 PM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote:
>Thanks. Actually we're trying to separate them but there's some issues >related with packaging web resources e.g., >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-494 > >If it's not a blocker, I'd like to fix this issue in the next release. As I understand it the only requirement is that you have a source release; which your combined one does. As I said it isn't optimal. The blocker as I see it is that the LICENSE file is incomplete as I mentioned earlier. > >On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. ><mfranklin@...> wrote: >> For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release >>is >> preferred [1]. This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that >> you should look at. >> >> [1]: >> >>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-t >>yp >> es >> >> On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote: >> >>>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd >>>>>party >>>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part >>>>>of >>>>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>>>which I >>>>> don't see in your LICENSE file. >>> >>>The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt >>>file contains the Apache license v2.0. >>> >>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt >>> >>>I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it >>>again? >> >> >> Ant itself includes code under a separate license. Since your binary >> release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need >>to >> include its license. >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE >> >> >> >>> >>>And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files. >>> >>>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>>>trunk to >>>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. >>> >>>I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not >>>tested enough yet. >>> >>>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut >>><thomas.jungblut@...> wrote: >>>> Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0 >>>>license. If >>>> we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until >>>>the >>>> overnext year. >>>> What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution? >>>> >>>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>>>trunk to >>>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. >>>> >>>> 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. <mfranklin@...> >>>> >>>>> -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns >>>>>noted >>>>> below. >>>>> >>>>> On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> >I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This >>>>>fixes >>>>> >the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. >>>>> > >>>>> >Signing KEYS: >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resource >>>>>s/ >>>>>fi >>>>> >les/KEYS >>>>> >Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ >>>>> >>>>> Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? >>>>> >>>>> Also, you can stage your artifacts at >>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own >>>>>public >>>>> html folder, but this is not required. >>>>> >>>>> >Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ >>>>> >NOTICE.txt: >>>>> >>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.tx >>>>>>t >>>>> >LICENSE.txt: >>>>> >>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.t >>>>>>xt >>>>> >>>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd >>>>>party >>>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part >>>>>of >>>>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>>>which I >>>>> don't see in your LICENSE file. >>>>> >>>>> >Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ >>>>> > >>>>> >You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license >>>>> >headers. >>>>> > >>>>> >I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 >>>>> >nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. >>>>> > >>>>> >Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! >>>>> > >>>>> >I hope this will be a final, and +1. >>>>> > >>>>> >Thanks. >>>>> >-- >>>>> >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>>>> >@eddieyoon >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >>>>> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thomas Jungblut >>>> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@...> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>>@eddieyoon >>> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >> > > > >-- >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >@eddieyoon > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
by Edward J. Yoon-2
::
Rate this Message:
I added "W3C® SOFTWARE NOTICE AND LICENSE" text additionally.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.4/LICENSE.txt Is this fix the LICENSE problem? If so, I'll re-create new one with this. Thanks. On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. <mfranklin@...> wrote: > On 2/25/12 8:12 PM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote: > >>Thanks. Actually we're trying to separate them but there's some issues >>related with packaging web resources e.g., >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-494 >> >>If it's not a blocker, I'd like to fix this issue in the next release. > > As I understand it the only requirement is that you have a source release; > which your combined one does. As I said it isn't optimal. > > The blocker as I see it is that the LICENSE file is incomplete as I > mentioned earlier. > >> >>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. >><mfranklin@...> wrote: >>> For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release >>>is >>> preferred [1]. This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that >>> you should look at. >>> >>> [1]: >>> >>>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-t >>>yp >>> es >>> >>> On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote: >>> >>>>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd >>>>>>party >>>>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part >>>>>>of >>>>>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>>>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>>>>which I >>>>>> don't see in your LICENSE file. >>>> >>>>The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt >>>>file contains the Apache license v2.0. >>>> >>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt >>>> >>>>I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it >>>>again? >>> >>> >>> Ant itself includes code under a separate license. Since your binary >>> release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need >>>to >>> include its license. >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files. >>>> >>>>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>>>>trunk to >>>>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. >>>> >>>>I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not >>>>tested enough yet. >>>> >>>>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut >>>><thomas.jungblut@...> wrote: >>>>> Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0 >>>>>license. If >>>>> we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until >>>>>the >>>>> overnext year. >>>>> What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution? >>>>> >>>>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>>>>trunk to >>>>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. >>>>> >>>>> 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. <mfranklin@...> >>>>> >>>>>> -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns >>>>>>noted >>>>>> below. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >Hi, >>>>>> > >>>>>> >I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This >>>>>>fixes >>>>>> >the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Signing KEYS: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resource >>>>>>s/ >>>>>>fi >>>>>> >les/KEYS >>>>>> >Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, you can stage your artifacts at >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own >>>>>>public >>>>>> html folder, but this is not required. >>>>>> >>>>>> >Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ >>>>>> >NOTICE.txt: >>>>>> >>>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.tx >>>>>>>t >>>>>> >LICENSE.txt: >>>>>> >>>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.t >>>>>>>xt >>>>>> >>>>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd >>>>>>party >>>>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part >>>>>>of >>>>>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>>>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>>>>which I >>>>>> don't see in your LICENSE file. >>>>>> >>>>>> >Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> >You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license >>>>>> >headers. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 >>>>>> >nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! >>>>>> > >>>>>> >I hope this will be a final, and +1. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Thanks. >>>>>> >-- >>>>>> >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>>>>> >@eddieyoon >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >>>>>> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thomas Jungblut >>>>> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@...> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>-- >>>>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>>>@eddieyoon >>>> >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >>> >> >> >> >>-- >>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>@eddieyoon >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
by Edward J. Yoon-2
::
Rate this Message:
Added also bloom filter license in described Hadoop LICENSE file.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.4/LICENSE.txt Is this now complete, Franklin? On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. <mfranklin@...> wrote: > On 2/25/12 8:12 PM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote: > >>Thanks. Actually we're trying to separate them but there's some issues >>related with packaging web resources e.g., >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-494 >> >>If it's not a blocker, I'd like to fix this issue in the next release. > > As I understand it the only requirement is that you have a source release; > which your combined one does. As I said it isn't optimal. > > The blocker as I see it is that the LICENSE file is incomplete as I > mentioned earlier. > >> >>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. >><mfranklin@...> wrote: >>> For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release >>>is >>> preferred [1]. This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that >>> you should look at. >>> >>> [1]: >>> >>>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-t >>>yp >>> es >>> >>> On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote: >>> >>>>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd >>>>>>party >>>>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part >>>>>>of >>>>>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>>>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>>>>which I >>>>>> don't see in your LICENSE file. >>>> >>>>The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt >>>>file contains the Apache license v2.0. >>>> >>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt >>>> >>>>I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it >>>>again? >>> >>> >>> Ant itself includes code under a separate license. Since your binary >>> release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need >>>to >>> include its license. >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files. >>>> >>>>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>>>>trunk to >>>>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. >>>> >>>>I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not >>>>tested enough yet. >>>> >>>>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut >>>><thomas.jungblut@...> wrote: >>>>> Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0 >>>>>license. If >>>>> we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until >>>>>the >>>>> overnext year. >>>>> What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution? >>>>> >>>>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>>>>trunk to >>>>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. >>>>> >>>>> 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. <mfranklin@...> >>>>> >>>>>> -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns >>>>>>noted >>>>>> below. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >Hi, >>>>>> > >>>>>> >I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This >>>>>>fixes >>>>>> >the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Signing KEYS: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resource >>>>>>s/ >>>>>>fi >>>>>> >les/KEYS >>>>>> >Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, you can stage your artifacts at >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own >>>>>>public >>>>>> html folder, but this is not required. >>>>>> >>>>>> >Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ >>>>>> >NOTICE.txt: >>>>>> >>>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.tx >>>>>>>t >>>>>> >LICENSE.txt: >>>>>> >>>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.t >>>>>>>xt >>>>>> >>>>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd >>>>>>party >>>>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part >>>>>>of >>>>>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>>>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>>>>which I >>>>>> don't see in your LICENSE file. >>>>>> >>>>>> >Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> >You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license >>>>>> >headers. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 >>>>>> >nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! >>>>>> > >>>>>> >I hope this will be a final, and +1. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Thanks. >>>>>> >-- >>>>>> >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>>>>> >@eddieyoon >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >>>>>> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thomas Jungblut >>>>> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@...> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>-- >>>>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>>>@eddieyoon >>>> >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >>> >> >> >> >>-- >>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>@eddieyoon >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... >>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... |
|
|
[CLOSED][VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
by Edward J. Yoon-2
::
Rate this Message:
I'm open new vote with RC7.
-- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@... |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
