[VOTE] Release Archiva 1.2

[brettporter]

On 25/03/2009, at 1:41 PM, James William Dumay wrote:

> -1
>
> I know it is a little late in the process, but I want to vote  
> against releasing 1.2.
>
> MRM-1154 blocks all users of Maven 2.1.x from using Archiva since  
> our metadata merging barfs on the xml schema attributes that were  
> slipped into the 2.1.x format.

Given this also affects 1.1, I don't see any benefit in delaying the  
release myself.

Is this really 1154? I didn't think the metadata parsing used Maven at  
all.

>
> It might also be wise for us to ship a 1.1.4 release that allows  
> compatibility for those who are sticking to the current stable  
> release event after 1.2 is GA.

+1, and a quick following 1.2.1 that can account for this.

- Brett

--
Brett Porter
brett@...
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

[Deng Ching-2]

Hi James,

I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1136 already addresses this
metadata problem? I tested it out using both virtual repos and just a
regular repository proxy, and I was able to get the artifacts with a Maven
2.1 metadata..

-Deng

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:41 AM, James William Dumay
<james@...>wrote:

> -1
>
> I know it is a little late in the process, but I want to vote against
> releasing 1.2.
>
> MRM-1154 blocks all users of Maven 2.1.x from using Archiva since our
> metadata merging barfs on the xml schema attributes that were slipped into
> the 2.1.x format.
>
> It might also be wise for us to ship a 1.1.4 release that allows
> compatibility for those who are sticking to the current stable release event
> after 1.2 is GA.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> James
>
>
> nicolas de loof wrote:
>
>> After javamail update I get it to work, and I also get logs in archiva.log
>> :D
>> So as a summary
>> - on tomcat 5.5 javamail>  1.2 seems to be required,
>> - migration from a 1.1 user database is broken
>> - some bad component.xml metadata are repported by the spring-plexus
>> bridge
>>
>> The 2nd one is a restriction that must be documented in the release note
>> as
>> this is not easy to know what's wrong when the app didn't start.
>>
>> As I really have fiew time to test the release, and even less to
>> contribute,
>> here is my +0
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:02 PM, nicolas de loof
>> <nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> My tomcat has mail.jar 1.2 in common/libbut this version allready defines
>>> a public InternetAddress( String ) AFAIK.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm using 1.4.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 10:25 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Archiva starts with a fresh new user database.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> But I can't create the admin :
>>>>> java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method
>>>>> javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress.<init>(Ljava/lang/String;Z)
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems my tomcat instance doesn't have the expected javamail version
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:18 PM, nicolas de loof
>>>>> <nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space :-/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems i've made too much start/stop tests - This time I will need some
>>>>>> help
>>>>>> from my system admin :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Are you able to check if it works with a clean one? I did try the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> upgrade
>>>>>>> earlier, but I wonder if anyone else is testing an upgrade from an
>>>>>>> older
>>>>>>> version?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Brett
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 10:04 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm sharing the database from my existing Archiva 1.1.1 instance
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 9:49 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is fully repeatable, and the app is deployed on a private test
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  context
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> path, so no request is coming in yet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Does the test set up have an existing users database or a clean
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>>>> database?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Brett
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Brett Porter
>>>>>>>>> brett@...
>>>>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Brett Porter
>>>>>>> brett@...
>>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>> Brett Porter
>>>> brett@...
>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

--
Maria Odea Ching
Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered

[nicolas de loof-2]

Same here : I upgraded my corporate archiva instance to 1.2 RC to get this
fixed as some project required some 2.1 deployed SNAPSHOT plugin.

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Maria Odea Ching <oching@...> wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1136 already addresses this
> metadata problem? I tested it out using both virtual repos and just a
> regular repository proxy, and I was able to get the artifacts with a Maven
> 2.1 metadata..
>
> -Deng
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:41 AM, James William Dumay
> <james@...>wrote:
>
> > -1
> >
> > I know it is a little late in the process, but I want to vote against
> > releasing 1.2.
> >
> > MRM-1154 blocks all users of Maven 2.1.x from using Archiva since our
> > metadata merging barfs on the xml schema attributes that were slipped
> into
> > the 2.1.x format.
> >
> > It might also be wise for us to ship a 1.1.4 release that allows
> > compatibility for those who are sticking to the current stable release
> event
> > after 1.2 is GA.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > James
> >
> >
> > nicolas de loof wrote:
> >
> >> After javamail update I get it to work, and I also get logs in
> archiva.log
> >> :D
> >> So as a summary
> >> - on tomcat 5.5 javamail>  1.2 seems to be required,
> >> - migration from a 1.1 user database is broken
> >> - some bad component.xml metadata are repported by the spring-plexus
> >> bridge
> >>
> >> The 2nd one is a restriction that must be documented in the release note
> >> as
> >> this is not easy to know what's wrong when the app didn't start.
> >>
> >> As I really have fiew time to test the release, and even less to
> >> contribute,
> >> here is my +0
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:02 PM, nicolas de loof
> >> <nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> My tomcat has mail.jar 1.2 in common/libbut this version allready
> defines
> >>> a public InternetAddress( String ) AFAIK.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>
>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I'm using 1.4.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24/03/2009, at 10:25 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>  Archiva starts with a fresh new user database.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> But I can't create the admin :
> >>>>> java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method
> >>>>> javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress.<init>(Ljava/lang/String;Z)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Seems my tomcat instance doesn't have the expected javamail version
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:18 PM, nicolas de loof
> >>>>> <nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space :-/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Seems i've made too much start/stop tests - This time I will need
> some
> >>>>>> help
> >>>>>> from my system admin :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  Are you able to check if it works with a clean one? I did try the
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> upgrade
> >>>>>>> earlier, but I wonder if anyone else is testing an upgrade from an
> >>>>>>> older
> >>>>>>> version?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - Brett
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 10:04 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm sharing the database from my existing Archiva 1.1.1 instance
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 9:49 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> This is fully repeatable, and the app is deployed on a private
> test
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>  context
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> path, so no request is coming in yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>  Does the test set up have an existing users database or a clean
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> users
> >>>>>>>>> database?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>>> Brett
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Brett Porter
> >>>>>>>>> brett@...
> >>>>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>  --
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Brett Porter
> >>>>>>> brett@...
> >>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>> Brett Porter
> >>>> brett@...
> >>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Maria Odea Ching
> Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
> www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered
>

[Arnaud HERITIER]

I have to test the fix today with 1.2 but I don't think I'll be able to
quicly migrate to it, that's why I ask to have a fix in 1.1.x :
MRM-1152<http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1152>
Arnaud

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:39 AM, nicolas de loof
<nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:

> Same here : I upgraded my corporate archiva instance to 1.2 RC to get this
> fixed as some project required some 2.1 deployed SNAPSHOT plugin.
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Maria Odea Ching <oching@...>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi James,
> >
> > I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1136 already addresses this
> > metadata problem? I tested it out using both virtual repos and just a
> > regular repository proxy, and I was able to get the artifacts with a
> Maven
> > 2.1 metadata..
> >
> > -Deng
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:41 AM, James William Dumay
> > <james@...>wrote:
> >
> > > -1
> > >
> > > I know it is a little late in the process, but I want to vote against
> > > releasing 1.2.
> > >
> > > MRM-1154 blocks all users of Maven 2.1.x from using Archiva since our
> > > metadata merging barfs on the xml schema attributes that were slipped
> > into
> > > the 2.1.x format.
> > >
> > > It might also be wise for us to ship a 1.1.4 release that allows
> > > compatibility for those who are sticking to the current stable release
> > event
> > > after 1.2 is GA.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> > >
> > > nicolas de loof wrote:
> > >
> > >> After javamail update I get it to work, and I also get logs in
> > archiva.log
> > >> :D
> > >> So as a summary
> > >> - on tomcat 5.5 javamail>  1.2 seems to be required,
> > >> - migration from a 1.1 user database is broken
> > >> - some bad component.xml metadata are repported by the spring-plexus
> > >> bridge
> > >>
> > >> The 2nd one is a restriction that must be documented in the release
> note
> > >> as
> > >> this is not easy to know what's wrong when the app didn't start.
> > >>
> > >> As I really have fiew time to test the release, and even less to
> > >> contribute,
> > >> here is my +0
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:02 PM, nicolas de loof
> > >> <nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> My tomcat has mail.jar 1.2 in common/libbut this version allready
> > defines
> > >>> a public InternetAddress( String ) AFAIK.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>
> >  wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> I'm using 1.4.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 24/03/2009, at 10:25 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  Archiva starts with a fresh new user database.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> But I can't create the admin :
> > >>>>> java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method
> > >>>>> javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress.<init>(Ljava/lang/String;Z)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Seems my tomcat instance doesn't have the expected javamail version
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:18 PM, nicolas de loof
> > >>>>> <nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>  java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space :-/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Seems i've made too much start/stop tests - This time I will need
> > some
> > >>>>>> help
> > >>>>>> from my system admin :)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>  Are you able to check if it works with a clean one? I did try the
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> upgrade
> > >>>>>>> earlier, but I wonder if anyone else is testing an upgrade from
> an
> > >>>>>>> older
> > >>>>>>> version?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> - Brett
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 10:04 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I'm sharing the database from my existing Archiva 1.1.1 instance
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...
> >
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 9:49 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> This is fully repeatable, and the app is deployed on a private
> > test
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>  context
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> path, so no request is coming in yet.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>  Does the test set up have an existing users database or a
> clean
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> users
> > >>>>>>>>> database?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>>>> Brett
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> Brett Porter
> > >>>>>>>>> brett@...
> > >>>>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>  --
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Brett Porter
> > >>>>>>> brett@...
> > >>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>> Brett Porter
> > >>>> brett@...
> > >>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Maria Odea Ching
> > Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
> > www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered
> >
>

--
Arnaud

[Deng Ching-2]

Speaking of MRM-1152.. I'm planning to get the fix in 1.1.4 some time this
week and stage it for release :)

Thanks,
Deng

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Arnaud HERITIER <aheritier@...>wrote:

> I have to test the fix today with 1.2 but I don't think I'll be able to
> quicly migrate to it, that's why I ask to have a fix in 1.1.x :
> MRM-1152<http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1152>
> Arnaud
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:39 AM, nicolas de loof
> <nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:
>
> > Same here : I upgraded my corporate archiva instance to 1.2 RC to get
> this
> > fixed as some project required some 2.1 deployed SNAPSHOT plugin.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Maria Odea Ching <oching@...>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi James,
> > >
> > > I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1136 already addresses
> this
> > > metadata problem? I tested it out using both virtual repos and just a
> > > regular repository proxy, and I was able to get the artifacts with a
> > Maven
> > > 2.1 metadata..
> > >
> > > -Deng
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:41 AM, James William Dumay
> > > <james@...>wrote:
> > >
> > > > -1
> > > >
> > > > I know it is a little late in the process, but I want to vote against
> > > > releasing 1.2.
> > > >
> > > > MRM-1154 blocks all users of Maven 2.1.x from using Archiva since our
> > > > metadata merging barfs on the xml schema attributes that were slipped
> > > into
> > > > the 2.1.x format.
> > > >
> > > > It might also be wise for us to ship a 1.1.4 release that allows
> > > > compatibility for those who are sticking to the current stable
> release
> > > event
> > > > after 1.2 is GA.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > James
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > nicolas de loof wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> After javamail update I get it to work, and I also get logs in
> > > archiva.log
> > > >> :D
> > > >> So as a summary
> > > >> - on tomcat 5.5 javamail>  1.2 seems to be required,
> > > >> - migration from a 1.1 user database is broken
> > > >> - some bad component.xml metadata are repported by the spring-plexus
> > > >> bridge
> > > >>
> > > >> The 2nd one is a restriction that must be documented in the release
> > note
> > > >> as
> > > >> this is not easy to know what's wrong when the app didn't start.
> > > >>
> > > >> As I really have fiew time to test the release, and even less to
> > > >> contribute,
> > > >> here is my +0
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:02 PM, nicolas de loof
> > > >> <nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> My tomcat has mail.jar 1.2 in common/libbut this version allready
> > > defines
> > > >>> a public InternetAddress( String ) AFAIK.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>
> > >  wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I'm using 1.4.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On 24/03/2009, at 10:25 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>  Archiva starts with a fresh new user database.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> But I can't create the admin :
> > > >>>>> java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method
> > > >>>>> javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress.<init>(Ljava/lang/String;Z)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Seems my tomcat instance doesn't have the expected javamail
> version
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:18 PM, nicolas de loof
> > > >>>>> <nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>  java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space :-/
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Seems i've made too much start/stop tests - This time I will
> need
> > > some
> > > >>>>>> help
> > > >>>>>> from my system admin :)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...
> >
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>  Are you able to check if it works with a clean one? I did try
> the
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> upgrade
> > > >>>>>>> earlier, but I wonder if anyone else is testing an upgrade from
> > an
> > > >>>>>>> older
> > > >>>>>>> version?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> - Brett
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 10:04 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I'm sharing the database from my existing Archiva 1.1.1
> instance
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Brett Porter<
> brett@...
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 9:49 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> This is fully repeatable, and the app is deployed on a
> private
> > > test
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>  context
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> path, so no request is coming in yet.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>  Does the test set up have an existing users database or a
> > clean
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> users
> > > >>>>>>>>> database?
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>>>>>> Brett
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>> Brett Porter
> > > >>>>>>>>> brett@...
> > > >>>>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>  --
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Brett Porter
> > > >>>>>>> brett@...
> > > >>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> --
> > > >>>> Brett Porter
> > > >>>> brett@...
> > > >>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Maria Odea Ching
> > > Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
> > > www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Arnaud
>

--
Maria Odea Ching
Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered

[brettporter]

James was using an older version of trunk, so it sounds like it's not  
an issue any more. I think the matter got confused by the open issue  
1154 which is actually about something else :)

- Brett

On 25/03/2009, at 6:03 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1136 already addresses  
> this
> metadata problem? I tested it out using both virtual repos and just a
> regular repository proxy, and I was able to get the artifacts with a  
> Maven
> 2.1 metadata..
>
> -Deng
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:41 AM, James William Dumay
> <james@...>wrote:
>
>> -1
>>
>> I know it is a little late in the process, but I want to vote against
>> releasing 1.2.
>>
>> MRM-1154 blocks all users of Maven 2.1.x from using Archiva since our
>> metadata merging barfs on the xml schema attributes that were  
>> slipped into
>> the 2.1.x format.
>>
>> It might also be wise for us to ship a 1.1.4 release that allows
>> compatibility for those who are sticking to the current stable  
>> release event
>> after 1.2 is GA.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>> nicolas de loof wrote:
>>
>>> After javamail update I get it to work, and I also get logs in  
>>> archiva.log
>>> :D
>>> So as a summary
>>> - on tomcat 5.5 javamail>  1.2 seems to be required,
>>> - migration from a 1.1 user database is broken
>>> - some bad component.xml metadata are repported by the spring-plexus
>>> bridge
>>>
>>> The 2nd one is a restriction that must be documented in the  
>>> release note
>>> as
>>> this is not easy to know what's wrong when the app didn't start.
>>>
>>> As I really have fiew time to test the release, and even less to
>>> contribute,
>>> here is my +0
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:02 PM, nicolas de loof
>>> <nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> My tomcat has mail.jar 1.2 in common/libbut this version allready  
>>>> defines
>>>> a public InternetAddress( String ) AFAIK.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>  
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'm using 1.4.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 10:25 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Archiva starts with a fresh new user database.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> But I can't create the admin :
>>>>>> java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method
>>>>>> javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress.<init>(Ljava/lang/String;Z)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems my tomcat instance doesn't have the expected javamail  
>>>>>> version
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:18 PM, nicolas de loof
>>>>>> <nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space :-/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seems i've made too much start/stop tests - This time I will  
>>>>>>> need some
>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>> from my system admin :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you able to check if it works with a clean one? I did try  
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> upgrade
>>>>>>>> earlier, but I wonder if anyone else is testing an upgrade  
>>>>>>>> from an
>>>>>>>> older
>>>>>>>> version?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Brett
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 10:04 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm sharing the database from my existing Archiva 1.1.1  
>>>>>>>> instance
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 9:49 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is fully repeatable, and the app is deployed on a  
>>>>>>>>>> private test
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> context
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> path, so no request is coming in yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Does the test set up have an existing users database or a  
>>>>>>>>>>> clean
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>>>>> database?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> Brett
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Brett Porter
>>>>>>>>>> brett@...
>>>>>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Brett Porter
>>>>>>>> brett@...
>>>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>> Brett Porter
>>>>> brett@...
>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Maria Odea Ching
> Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype:  
> maria.odea.ching |
> www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered

--
Brett Porter
brett@...
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

[Deng Ching-2]

Ok, thanks for clarifying that Brett :) I guess I can tally the votes now..

-Deng

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brett Porter <brett@...> wrote:

> James was using an older version of trunk, so it sounds like it's not an
> issue any more. I think the matter got confused by the open issue 1154 which
> is actually about something else :)
>
> - Brett
>
>
> On 25/03/2009, at 6:03 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
>
>  Hi James,
>>
>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1136 already addresses this
>> metadata problem? I tested it out using both virtual repos and just a
>> regular repository proxy, and I was able to get the artifacts with a Maven
>> 2.1 metadata..
>>
>> -Deng
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:41 AM, James William Dumay
>> <james@...>wrote:
>>
>>  -1
>>>
>>> I know it is a little late in the process, but I want to vote against
>>> releasing 1.2.
>>>
>>> MRM-1154 blocks all users of Maven 2.1.x from using Archiva since our
>>> metadata merging barfs on the xml schema attributes that were slipped
>>> into
>>> the 2.1.x format.
>>>
>>> It might also be wise for us to ship a 1.1.4 release that allows
>>> compatibility for those who are sticking to the current stable release
>>> event
>>> after 1.2 is GA.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>>
>>> nicolas de loof wrote:
>>>
>>>  After javamail update I get it to work, and I also get logs in
>>>> archiva.log
>>>> :D
>>>> So as a summary
>>>> - on tomcat 5.5 javamail>  1.2 seems to be required,
>>>> - migration from a 1.1 user database is broken
>>>> - some bad component.xml metadata are repported by the spring-plexus
>>>> bridge
>>>>
>>>> The 2nd one is a restriction that must be documented in the release note
>>>> as
>>>> this is not easy to know what's wrong when the app didn't start.
>>>>
>>>> As I really have fiew time to test the release, and even less to
>>>> contribute,
>>>> here is my +0
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:02 PM, nicolas de loof
>>>> <nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  My tomcat has mail.jar 1.2 in common/libbut this version allready
>>>>> defines
>>>>> a public InternetAddress( String ) AFAIK.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  I'm using 1.4.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 10:25 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Archiva starts with a fresh new user database.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  But I can't create the admin :
>>>>>>> java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method
>>>>>>> javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress.<init>(Ljava/lang/String;Z)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seems my tomcat instance doesn't have the expected javamail version
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:18 PM, nicolas de loof
>>>>>>> <nicolas.deloof@...>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space :-/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Seems i've made too much start/stop tests - This time I will need
>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>> from my system admin :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you able to check if it works with a clean one? I did try the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  upgrade
>>>>>>>>> earlier, but I wonder if anyone else is testing an upgrade from an
>>>>>>>>> older
>>>>>>>>> version?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Brett
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 10:04 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm sharing the database from my existing Archiva 1.1.1 instance
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Brett Porter<brett@...>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 24/03/2009, at 9:49 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  This is fully repeatable, and the app is deployed on a private
>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> context
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  path, so no request is coming in yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Does the test set up have an existing users database or a clean
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  users
>>>>>>>>>>> database?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>> Brett
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Brett Porter
>>>>>>>>>>> brett@...
>>>>>>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  Brett Porter
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> brett@...
>>>>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Brett Porter
>>>>>> brett@...
>>>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Maria Odea Ching
>> Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
>> www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered
>>
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@...
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>

--
Maria Odea Ching
Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered

[Deng Ching-2]

+1s
3 Binding: Emmanuel, Fabrice, Brett, Deng
1 Non-binding: Shi Yusen

-1 Binding: James
+0 - Nicolas

The -1 binding vote has been resolved though, so I think we can proceed with
the release.
Thanks for testing out the RC and for casting your votes :)

BTW, it's Archiva's first year anniversary as a TLP this month and what's
the best way to celebrate it than with a new release :)
Cheers everyone!

-Deng

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oching@...> wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
> The Archiva 1.2 release has been staged. The binaries, including the
> sources, signatures and checksums, are available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.2/<http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1.2/>
>
> You can take a look at the release notes at
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14288&styleName=Text&projectId=10980or
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/staging-sites/archiva-1.2/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/staging-sites/archiva-1.2/release-notes.html>
>  <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/archiva/1.1.2/release-notes.html>While the staged site can be viewed here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/staging-sites/archiva-1.2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/archiva/1.1.2>
>
> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
>
> [ ] +1 Release it!
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1 Don't release it, because..
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release :)
>
>
> Cheers,
> Deng
>
> --
> Maria Odea Ching
> Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
> www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered
>

--
Maria Odea Ching
Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered

[Emmanuel Venisse-2]

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oching@...> wrote:

> +1s
> 3 Binding: Emmanuel, Fabrice, Brett, Deng


==> 4 not 3 ;-P

>
> 1 Non-binding: Shi Yusen
>
> -1 Binding: James
> +0 - Nicolas
>
> The -1 binding vote has been resolved though, so I think we can proceed
> with
> the release.
> Thanks for testing out the RC and for casting your votes :)
>
> BTW, it's Archiva's first year anniversary as a TLP this month and what's
> the best way to celebrate it than with a new release :)
> Cheers everyone!
>
> -Deng
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oching@...>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> > The Archiva 1.2 release has been staged. The binaries, including the
> > sources, signatures and checksums, are available here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.2/<
> http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1.2/>
> >
> > You can take a look at the release notes at
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14288&styleName=Text&projectId=10980or
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/staging-sites/archiva-1.2/release-notes.html
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/staging-sites/archiva-1.2/release-notes.html
> >
> >  <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/archiva/1.1.2/release-notes.html>While
> the staged site can be viewed here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~oching/staging-sites/archiva-1.2/<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/archiva/1.1.2>
> >
> > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release it!
> > [ ] 0
> > [ ] -1 Don't release it, because..
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release :)
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Deng
> >
> > --
> > Maria Odea Ching
> > Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
> > www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Maria Odea Ching
> Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
> www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered
>

[Deng Ching-2]

LOL.. right, sorry it should be 4 :) Thanks Emm!

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Emmanuel Venisse <
emmanuel.venisse@...> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oching@...>
> wrote:
>
> > +1s
> > 3 Binding: Emmanuel, Fabrice, Brett, Deng
>
>
> ==> 4 not 3 ;-P
>
>
> >
> > 1 Non-binding: Shi Yusen
> >
> > -1 Binding: James
> > +0 - Nicolas
> >
> > The -1 binding vote has been resolved though, so I think we can proceed
> > with
> > the release.
> > Thanks for testing out the RC and for casting your votes :)
> >
> > BTW, it's Archiva's first year anniversary as a TLP this month and what's
> > the best way to celebrate it than with a new release :)
> > Cheers everyone!
> >
> > -Deng
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oching@...>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > > The Archiva 1.2 release has been staged. The binaries, including the
> > > sources, signatures and checksums, are available here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.2/<
> > http://people.apache.org/builds/archiva/1.1.2/>
> > >
> > > You can take a look at the release notes at
> > >
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14288&styleName=Text&projectId=10980or
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~oching/staging-sites/archiva-1.2/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/staging-sites/archiva-1.2/release-notes.html>
> > <
> >
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/staging-sites/archiva-1.2/release-notes.html
> > >
> > >  <http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/archiva/1.1.2/release-notes.html
> >While
> > the staged site can be viewed here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~oching/staging-sites/archiva-1.2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/staging-sites/archiva-1.2/>
> <
> > http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/archiva/1.1.2>
> > >
> > > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release it!
> > > [ ] 0
> > > [ ] -1 Don't release it, because..
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release :)
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Deng
> > >
> > > --
> > > Maria Odea Ching
> > > Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
> > > www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Maria Odea Ching
> > Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
> > www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered
> >
>

--
Maria Odea Ching
Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching |
www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered