[busybox on kbsd] patches ported to 1.14

[Luca Favatella]

Hi, Aurelien.


I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply.
I kept the patches for 1.13 in svn; I added a new dir with the ones that needed changes [1].

I updated the wiki page [2].

I only tested building busybox. I didn't test the resulting binaries.


Should the udeb from busybox 1.14 be used in daily builds of d-i instead of that from 1.13?
Can I help in doing this? How?


Cheers,
Luca Favatella



[0] http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i/people/slackydeb/kfreebsd/busybox/1.13/debian/
[1] http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i/people/slackydeb/kfreebsd/busybox/1.14/debian/
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/kFreeBSD#BusyBox


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Otavio Salvador-2]

Hello Luca,

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Luca Favatella <slackydeb@...> wrote:

> Hi, Aurelien.
>
>
> I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply.
> I kept the patches for 1.13 in svn; I added a new dir with the ones that needed changes [1].
>
> I updated the wiki page [2].
>
> I only tested building busybox. I didn't test the resulting binaries.
>
>
> Should the udeb from busybox 1.14 be used in daily builds of d-i instead of that from 1.13?
> Can I help in doing this? How?

I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid;
Bastian, do you object?

--
Otavio Salvador                  O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@...  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: [phone]         http://projetos.ossystems.com.br


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Bastian Blank]

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:07:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid;
> Bastian, do you object?

Well, there is a 1.15.1 already as stable.

Bastian

--
I'm a soldier, not a diplomat.  I can only tell the truth.
                -- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.9


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Otavio Salvador-2]

Hello Bastian,

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Bastian Blank <waldi@...> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:07:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid;
>> Bastian, do you object?
>
> Well, there is a 1.15.1 already as stable.

Anyway; do you object to Luca commit the specific patches and get them
applied only for kfreebsd-*?

TIA,

--
Otavio Salvador                  O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@...  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: [phone]         http://projetos.ossystems.com.br


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Luca Favatella]

Hi Otavio, hi Bastian.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:35:07PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
[...]
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Bastian Blank <waldi@...> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:07:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid;
> >> Bastian, do you object?
> >
> > Well, there is a 1.15.1 already as stable.

1.15.x has already a couple of these patches in.
It would be great to have 1.15.x packaged in Debian (experimental?).


> Anyway; do you object to Luca commit the specific patches and get them
> applied only for kfreebsd-*?

Some of them are a bit hackish, however they should not affect Linux
(except for config).


Cheers,
Luca Favatella


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Aurelien Jarno]

Luca Favatella a écrit :
> Hi, Aurelien.
>
>
> I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply.
> I kept the patches for 1.13 in svn; I added a new dir with the ones that needed changes [1].
>
> I updated the wiki page [2].
>
> I only tested building busybox. I didn't test the resulting binaries.

Thanks, I'll test that.

> Should the udeb from busybox 1.14 be used in daily builds of d-i instead of that from 1.13?
> Can I help in doing this? How?
>

I'll test a build of d-i with this new version, and if it works, I'll
put the udeb on the machines generating the daily builds.

--
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@...                 http://www.aurel32.net


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Luca Favatella]

On 01/10/2009, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...> wrote:
> Luca Favatella a écrit :
[...]

>> I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little
>> task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply.
>> I kept the patches for 1.13 in svn; I added a new dir with the ones that
>> needed changes [1].
>>
>> I updated the wiki page [2].
>>
>> I only tested building busybox. I didn't test the resulting binaries.
>
> Thanks, I'll test that.

Ok, thanks.

>> Should the udeb from busybox 1.14 be used in daily builds of d-i instead
>> of that from 1.13?
>> Can I help in doing this? How?
>>
>
> I'll test a build of d-i with this new version, and if it works, I'll
> put the udeb on the machines generating the daily builds.

Thanks,
Luca Favatella


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Aurelien Jarno]

On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 06:35:24PM +0200, Luca Favatella wrote:

> On 01/10/2009, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...> wrote:
> > Luca Favatella a écrit :
> [...]
> >> I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little
> >> task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply.
> >> I kept the patches for 1.13 in svn; I added a new dir with the ones that
> >> needed changes [1].
> >>
> >> I updated the wiki page [2].
> >>
> >> I only tested building busybox. I didn't test the resulting binaries.
> >
> > Thanks, I'll test that.
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> >> Should the udeb from busybox 1.14 be used in daily builds of d-i instead
> >> of that from 1.13?
> >> Can I help in doing this? How?
> >>
> >
> > I'll test a build of d-i with this new version, and if it works, I'll
> > put the udeb on the machines generating the daily builds.
>

I have tested d-i with busybox 1.14.2 and your patches and it works
well. Thanks! It will be used in the daily builds starting today.

Aurelien

--
Aurelien Jarno                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@...                 http://www.aurel32.net


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Luca Favatella]

On 05/10/2009, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...> wrote:
[...]
> I have tested d-i with busybox 1.14.2 and your patches and it works
> well. Thanks! It will be used in the daily builds starting today.

Thanks.

When I have a bit of free time I hope to
* clean a bit the svn dir to keep only 1.14 patches (moving patches
and deleting the 1.13 dir)
* accordingly update the wiki page


Cheers,
Luca Favatella


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Luca Favatella]

On 05/10/2009, Luca Favatella <slackydeb@...> wrote:

> On 05/10/2009, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...> wrote:
> [...]
>> I have tested d-i with busybox 1.14.2 and your patches and it works
>> well. Thanks! It will be used in the daily builds starting today.
>
> Thanks.
>
> When I have a bit of free time I hope to
> * clean a bit the svn dir to keep only 1.14 patches (moving patches
> and deleting the 1.13 dir)
> * accordingly update the wiki page

Done.
(The patches are the same, I only moved them)

Cheers,
Luca Favatella


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...