[draft-duerst-iri-bis-06] byte vs. octet

View: New views
4 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

[draft-duerst-iri-bis-06] byte vs. octet

by Marcin Hanclik :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

The draft
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06
contains the following sentence:
"Terminals in the ABNF are characters, not bytes."

This sentence seems inconsistent with the definition in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06#section-1.3
that introduces the term of "octet".
I assume that in the above sentence "byte" is meant as "octet".

So - to properly refer to the introduced definitions - you could use the following:
"Terminals in the ABNF are characters, not octets."

Similarly in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06#section-8.3
you could write
"Correctly used, the clipboard transfers characters, not
   octets, which .."
instead of
"Correctly used, the clipboard transfers characters, not
   bytes, which ..."

Thanks.

Kind regards,
Marcin

________________________________________

Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda

www.access-company.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.


RE: [draft-duerst-iri-bis-06] byte vs. octet

by Marcin Hanclik :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

I found more places where I would put "octet" instead of "byte".
My previous email mentions only "bytes" -> "octets".

This is the list:
5.3.1
"byte-for-byte" -> "octet-for-octet"
"byte array" -> "octet array" or, probably better, "sequence of octets" (another definition)
10.
"byte sequences" -> "octet sequences" or "sequences of octets"
"the byte 0x2F" -> "the octet 0x2F"

Thanks.

Kind regards,
Marcin
________________________________________
From: public-iri-request@... [public-iri-request@...] On Behalf Of Marcin Hanclik [Marcin.Hanclik@...]
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 3:06 PM
To: public-iri@...
Subject: [draft-duerst-iri-bis-06] byte vs. octet

Hi,

The draft
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06
contains the following sentence:
"Terminals in the ABNF are characters, not bytes."

This sentence seems inconsistent with the definition in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06#section-1.3
that introduces the term of "octet".
I assume that in the above sentence "byte" is meant as "octet".

So - to properly refer to the introduced definitions - you could use the following:
"Terminals in the ABNF are characters, not octets."

Similarly in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06#section-8.3
you could write
"Correctly used, the clipboard transfers characters, not
   octets, which .."
instead of
"Correctly used, the clipboard transfers characters, not
   bytes, which ..."

Thanks.

Kind regards,
Marcin

________________________________________

Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda

www.access-company.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.


________________________________________

Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda

www.access-company.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.


Re: [draft-duerst-iri-bis-06] byte vs. octet

by "Martin J. Dürst" :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hello Marcin,

Thanks for your comments. I have taken note of them so that we can fix
them in the near future.

Regards,   Martin.

On 2009/07/26 22:06, Marcin Hanclik wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The draft
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06
> contains the following sentence:
> "Terminals in the ABNF are characters, not bytes."
>
> This sentence seems inconsistent with the definition in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06#section-1.3
> that introduces the term of "octet".
> I assume that in the above sentence "byte" is meant as "octet".
>
> So - to properly refer to the introduced definitions - you could use the following:
> "Terminals in the ABNF are characters, not octets."
>
> Similarly in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06#section-8.3
> you could write
> "Correctly used, the clipboard transfers characters, not
>     octets, which .."
> instead of
> "Correctly used, the clipboard transfers characters, not
>     bytes, which ..."
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kind regards,
> Marcin
>
> ________________________________________
>
> Access Systems Germany GmbH
> Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
> HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda
>
> www.access-company.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
>
>

--
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst@...


RE: [draft-duerst-iri-bis-06] byte vs. octet

by Marcin Hanclik :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Thanks, Martin.

Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452  |  Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanclik@...

-----Original Message-----
From: "Martin J. Dürst" [mailto:duerst@...]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 9:06 AM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: public-iri@...
Subject: Re: [draft-duerst-iri-bis-06] byte vs. octet

Hello Marcin,

Thanks for your comments. I have taken note of them so that we can fix
them in the near future.

Regards,   Martin.

On 2009/07/26 22:06, Marcin Hanclik wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The draft
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06
> contains the following sentence:
> "Terminals in the ABNF are characters, not bytes."
>
> This sentence seems inconsistent with the definition in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06#section-1.3
> that introduces the term of "octet".
> I assume that in the above sentence "byte" is meant as "octet".
>
> So - to properly refer to the introduced definitions - you could use the following:
> "Terminals in the ABNF are characters, not octets."
>
> Similarly in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06#section-8.3
> you could write
> "Correctly used, the clipboard transfers characters, not
>     octets, which .."
> instead of
> "Correctly used, the clipboard transfers characters, not
>     bytes, which ..."
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kind regards,
> Marcin
>
> ________________________________________
>
> Access Systems Germany GmbH
> Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
> HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda
>
> www.access-company.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
>
>

--
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst@...

________________________________________

Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda

www.access-company.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.