[fulcrum] [VOTE] Release fulcrum-upload-1.0.5 based on RC1

[Thomas Vandahl-2]

Hi folks,

A release candidate for fulcrum-upload-1.0.5 has been prepared.
Please verify this release candidate and vote...

Tag:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/turbine/fulcrum/tags/FULCRUM_UPLOAD_1_0_5/

Site:

http://turbine.apache.org/builds/fulcrum/fulcrum-upload/1.0.5/RC1/site/

Binaries:

http://turbine.apache.org/builds/turbine/fulcrum/fulcrum-upload/1.0.5/RC1/staged/org/apache/fulcrum/fulcrum-upload/1.0.5/


[ ] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because

Bye, Thomas.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...

[Siegfried Goeschl]

Hi Thomas

basically +1 but a few comments

+) the javadoc in the interface and implementation does not match with
the method signature
+) site generation fails with Maven3 but "package" works
+) Cobertura report fails but this is a known issue

Cheers,

Siegfried Goeschl

On 11.05.12 18:38, Thomas Vandahl wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> A release candidate for fulcrum-upload-1.0.5 has been prepared.
> Please verify this release candidate and vote...
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/turbine/fulcrum/tags/FULCRUM_UPLOAD_1_0_5/
>
> Site:
>
> http://turbine.apache.org/builds/fulcrum/fulcrum-upload/1.0.5/RC1/site/
>
> Binaries:
>
> http://turbine.apache.org/builds/turbine/fulcrum/fulcrum-upload/1.0.5/RC1/staged/org/apache/fulcrum/fulcrum-upload/1.0.5/
>
>
> [ ] +1 release it
> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because
>
> Bye, Thomas.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...

[Thomas Vandahl-2]

On 16.05.12 21:56, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi Thomas
>
> basically +1 but a few comments
>
> +) the javadoc in the interface and implementation does not match with
> the method signature

Ludwig, this was your stuff, IIRC. Do you want to fix this first? I can
then cut an RC2.

> +) site generation fails with Maven3 but "package" works

Any hints on how to make this compatible with both, Maven2 and Maven3?

> +) Cobertura report fails but this is a known issue

???

Bye, Thomas.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...