[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727641#action_12727641 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1721:
--------------------------------------
bq. but some custom caches may not work on a per segment basis
Just because you get a new IndexReader doesn't mean you have to use it, if not enough (or nothing) changed.
> IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1721
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Reporter: Shay Banon
>
> It would be great if IndexWriter would allow for deletion by doc ids as well. It makes sense for cases where a "query" has been executed beforehand, and later, that query needs to be applied in order to delete the matched documents.
> More information here:
http://www.nabble.com/Delete-by-docId-in-IndexWriter-td24239930.html--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
java-dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
java-dev-help@...
