|
View:
New views
10 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscuredkeystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: GERONIMO-4927 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Affects Versions: 2.2, 3.0 Reporter: Kevan Miller Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2, 3.0 keystorePass does not conform to the current convention for encrypting/obscuring GBean attributes. Currently, attribute names with 'password' will be encrypted. We should either recognize keystorePass as an attribute requiring encryption or add a new keystorePassword attribute and start using that (with some appropriate migration logic, if a 'keystorePass' is configured). I guess I prefer the latter option. Other opinions? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. |
|
|
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12770373#action_12770373 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4927: ---------------------------------------- There is no TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean in 2.2. All the config info is in var/catalina/server.xml. So, mechanism for 2.1.x won't work on 2.2. Don't know of a way to accomplish this on 2.2, at the moment -- unfortunate. > keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4927 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Affects Versions: 2.2, 3.0 > Reporter: Kevan Miller > Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2, 3.0 > > > keystorePass does not conform to the current convention for encrypting/obscuring GBean attributes. Currently, attribute names with 'password' will be encrypted. > We should either recognize keystorePass as an attribute requiring encryption or add a new keystorePassword attribute and start using that (with some appropriate migration logic, if a 'keystorePass' is configured). I guess I prefer the latter option. Other opinions? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. |
|
|
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-4927: ----------------------------------- Affects Version/s: (was: 3.0) (was: 2.2) 2.2.1 > keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4927 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Affects Versions: 2.2.1 > Reporter: Kevan Miller > Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2, 3.0 > > > keystorePass does not conform to the current convention for encrypting/obscuring GBean attributes. Currently, attribute names with 'password' will be encrypted. > We should either recognize keystorePass as an attribute requiring encryption or add a new keystorePassword attribute and start using that (with some appropriate migration logic, if a 'keystorePass' is configured). I guess I prefer the latter option. Other opinions? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. |
|
|
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-4927: ----------------------------------- Affects Version/s: (was: 2.2.1) 2.2 2.1.5 Fix Version/s: (was: 2.2) 2.2.1 tomcat ssl should be using one of out keystore gbeans so it doesn't need to know about the password at all. Not gonna happen for 2.2 anyway... > keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4927 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Affects Versions: 2.1.5, 2.2 > Reporter: Kevan Miller > Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2.1, 3.0 > > > keystorePass does not conform to the current convention for encrypting/obscuring GBean attributes. Currently, attribute names with 'password' will be encrypted. > We should either recognize keystorePass as an attribute requiring encryption or add a new keystorePassword attribute and start using that (with some appropriate migration logic, if a 'keystorePass' is configured). I guess I prefer the latter option. Other opinions? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. |
|
|
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773017#action_12773017 ] Ashish Jain commented on GERONIMO-4927: --------------------------------------- Can we not rename the existing attribute as keystorePassword? Or else add another line of code in org.apache.geronimo.system.configuration.GBeanOverride.writeXml to encrypt the keystorePass adding some logic for example indexof('pass") than do the encryption > keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4927 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Affects Versions: 2.1.5, 2.2 > Reporter: Kevan Miller > Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2.1, 3.0 > > > keystorePass does not conform to the current convention for encrypting/obscuring GBean attributes. Currently, attribute names with 'password' will be encrypted. > We should either recognize keystorePass as an attribute requiring encryption or add a new keystorePassword attribute and start using that (with some appropriate migration logic, if a 'keystorePass' is configured). I guess I prefer the latter option. Other opinions? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. |
|
|
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773038#action_12773038 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4927: ---------------------------------------- Yes. That is what I meant by "add a new 'keystorePassword' attribute". Basic question is should it be *renamed* or still support keystorePass for migration purposes. > keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4927 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Affects Versions: 2.1.5, 2.2 > Reporter: Kevan Miller > Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2.1, 3.0 > > > keystorePass does not conform to the current convention for encrypting/obscuring GBean attributes. Currently, attribute names with 'password' will be encrypted. > We should either recognize keystorePass as an attribute requiring encryption or add a new keystorePassword attribute and start using that (with some appropriate migration logic, if a 'keystorePass' is configured). I guess I prefer the latter option. Other opinions? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. |
|
|
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773508#action_12773508 ] Ashish Jain commented on GERONIMO-4927: --------------------------------------- IMO the best way without introducing much complexity would be to have a line of code checking for keystorePass attribute. In this way we may not have to worry about migration issues. I have generated a patch. Please verify. Thanks. > keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4927 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Affects Versions: 2.1.5, 2.2 > Reporter: Kevan Miller > Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2.1, 3.0 > > > keystorePass does not conform to the current convention for encrypting/obscuring GBean attributes. Currently, attribute names with 'password' will be encrypted. > We should either recognize keystorePass as an attribute requiring encryption or add a new keystorePassword attribute and start using that (with some appropriate migration logic, if a 'keystorePass' is configured). I guess I prefer the latter option. Other opinions? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. |
|
|
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Jain updated GERONIMO-4927: ---------------------------------- Attachment: 4927.patch > keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4927 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Affects Versions: 2.1.5, 2.2 > Reporter: Kevan Miller > Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2.1, 3.0 > > Attachments: 4927.patch > > > keystorePass does not conform to the current convention for encrypting/obscuring GBean attributes. Currently, attribute names with 'password' will be encrypted. > We should either recognize keystorePass as an attribute requiring encryption or add a new keystorePassword attribute and start using that (with some appropriate migration logic, if a 'keystorePass' is configured). I guess I prefer the latter option. Other opinions? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. |
|
|
[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4927. ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 2.2.1) (was: 3.0) Applied slightly modified patch. Thanks Ashish. keystorePass cannot be specified currently on 2.2 and 3.0. So, I've only applied to branches/2.1. > keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4927 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Affects Versions: 2.1.5, 2.2 > Reporter: Kevan Miller > Assignee: Kevan Miller > Fix For: 2.1.5 > > Attachments: 4927.patch > > > keystorePass does not conform to the current convention for encrypting/obscuring GBean attributes. Currently, attribute names with 'password' will be encrypted. > We should either recognize keystorePass as an attribute requiring encryption or add a new keystorePassword attribute and start using that (with some appropriate migration logic, if a 'keystorePass' is configured). I guess I prefer the latter option. Other opinions? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. |
|
|
[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4927: -------------------------------------- Assignee: Kevan Miller > keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4927 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Affects Versions: 2.1.5, 2.2 > Reporter: Kevan Miller > Assignee: Kevan Miller > Fix For: 2.1.5 > > Attachments: 4927.patch > > > keystorePass does not conform to the current convention for encrypting/obscuring GBean attributes. Currently, attribute names with 'password' will be encrypted. > We should either recognize keystorePass as an attribute requiring encryption or add a new keystorePassword attribute and start using that (with some appropriate migration logic, if a 'keystorePass' is configured). I guess I prefer the latter option. Other opinions? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |