[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1486) Wildcards, ORs etc inside Phrase queries

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749557#action_12749557 ]

Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1486:
------------------------------------

We hope to implement this on LUCENE-1823, along with other features.

> Wildcards, ORs etc inside Phrase queries
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1486
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: QueryParser
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Mark Harwood
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0, 3.1
>
>         Attachments: ComplexPhraseQueryParser.java, junit_complex_phrase_qp_07_21_2009.patch, junit_complex_phrase_qp_07_22_2009.patch, Lucene-1486 non default field.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, TestComplexPhraseQuery.java
>
>
> An extension to the default QueryParser that overrides the parsing of PhraseQueries to allow more complex syntax e.g. wildcards in phrase queries.
> The implementation feels a little hacky - this is arguably better handled in QueryParser itself. This works as a proof of concept  for much of the query parser syntax. Examples from the Junit test include:
> checkMatches("\"j*   smyth~\"", "1,2"); //wildcards and fuzzies are OK in phrases
> checkMatches("\"(jo* -john)  smith\"", "2"); // boolean logic works
> checkMatches("\"jo*  smith\"~2", "1,2,3"); // position logic works.
>
> checkBadQuery("\"jo*  id:1 smith\""); //mixing fields in a phrase is bad
> checkBadQuery("\"jo* \"smith\" \""); //phrases inside phrases is bad
> checkBadQuery("\"jo* [sma TO smZ]\" \""); //range queries inside phrases not supported
> Code plus Junit test to follow...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@...

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Mark Miller reassigned LUCENE-1486:
-----------------------------------

    Assignee:     (was: Mark Miller)

> Wildcards, ORs etc inside Phrase queries
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1486
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: QueryParser
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Mark Harwood
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0, 3.1
>
>         Attachments: ComplexPhraseQueryParser.java, junit_complex_phrase_qp_07_21_2009.patch, junit_complex_phrase_qp_07_22_2009.patch, Lucene-1486 non default field.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, TestComplexPhraseQuery.java
>
>
> An extension to the default QueryParser that overrides the parsing of PhraseQueries to allow more complex syntax e.g. wildcards in phrase queries.
> The implementation feels a little hacky - this is arguably better handled in QueryParser itself. This works as a proof of concept  for much of the query parser syntax. Examples from the Junit test include:
> checkMatches("\"j*   smyth~\"", "1,2"); //wildcards and fuzzies are OK in phrases
> checkMatches("\"(jo* -john)  smith\"", "2"); // boolean logic works
> checkMatches("\"jo*  smith\"~2", "1,2,3"); // position logic works.
>
> checkBadQuery("\"jo*  id:1 smith\""); //mixing fields in a phrase is bad
> checkBadQuery("\"jo* \"smith\" \""); //phrases inside phrases is bad
> checkBadQuery("\"jo* [sma TO smZ]\" \""); //range queries inside phrases not supported
> Code plus Junit test to follow...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@...

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1486:
----------------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: 3.0)

Move to 3.1 as this is a new feature.

> Wildcards, ORs etc inside Phrase queries
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1486
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: QueryParser
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Mark Harwood
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.1
>
>         Attachments: ComplexPhraseQueryParser.java, junit_complex_phrase_qp_07_21_2009.patch, junit_complex_phrase_qp_07_22_2009.patch, Lucene-1486 non default field.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, TestComplexPhraseQuery.java
>
>
> An extension to the default QueryParser that overrides the parsing of PhraseQueries to allow more complex syntax e.g. wildcards in phrase queries.
> The implementation feels a little hacky - this is arguably better handled in QueryParser itself. This works as a proof of concept  for much of the query parser syntax. Examples from the Junit test include:
> checkMatches("\"j*   smyth~\"", "1,2"); //wildcards and fuzzies are OK in phrases
> checkMatches("\"(jo* -john)  smith\"", "2"); // boolean logic works
> checkMatches("\"jo*  smith\"~2", "1,2,3"); // position logic works.
>
> checkBadQuery("\"jo*  id:1 smith\""); //mixing fields in a phrase is bad
> checkBadQuery("\"jo* \"smith\" \""); //phrases inside phrases is bad
> checkBadQuery("\"jo* [sma TO smZ]\" \""); //range queries inside phrases not supported
> Code plus Junit test to follow...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@...

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782254#action_12782254 ]

Ahmet Arslan commented on LUCENE-1486:
--------------------------------------

Hi Mark,

Up to now, I was consuming ComplexPhraseQueryParser.java by means of copy paste into my source code, so I didn't notice.
Today I find out that ComplexPhraseQuery.java in Lucene 2.9.1 Misc has missed the non default field.patch.
It gives exception with author:"fred* smith" style queries.
I am writing a solr plugin to contribute for this query parser and Solr 1.4.0 directly depends on lucene-misc-2.9.1.jar.
Should I edit and include source code of  ComplexPhraseQueryParser.java in my patch to solve this problem?
Or is there a more convenient way to do it?

Thank you for your consideration.

> Wildcards, ORs etc inside Phrase queries
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1486
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: QueryParser
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Mark Harwood
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.1
>
>         Attachments: ComplexPhraseQueryParser.java, junit_complex_phrase_qp_07_21_2009.patch, junit_complex_phrase_qp_07_22_2009.patch, Lucene-1486 non default field.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, TestComplexPhraseQuery.java
>
>
> An extension to the default QueryParser that overrides the parsing of PhraseQueries to allow more complex syntax e.g. wildcards in phrase queries.
> The implementation feels a little hacky - this is arguably better handled in QueryParser itself. This works as a proof of concept  for much of the query parser syntax. Examples from the Junit test include:
> checkMatches("\"j*   smyth~\"", "1,2"); //wildcards and fuzzies are OK in phrases
> checkMatches("\"(jo* -john)  smith\"", "2"); // boolean logic works
> checkMatches("\"jo*  smith\"~2", "1,2,3"); // position logic works.
>
> checkBadQuery("\"jo*  id:1 smith\""); //mixing fields in a phrase is bad
> checkBadQuery("\"jo* \"smith\" \""); //phrases inside phrases is bad
> checkBadQuery("\"jo* [sma TO smZ]\" \""); //range queries inside phrases not supported
> Code plus Junit test to follow...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@...

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12782521#action_12782521 ]

Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1486:
--------------------------------------

Ugh. There's probably two separate actions required here then:
1) a bug needs raising on Lucene.
2) guidance needed from the Solr team about preferred course of action

> Wildcards, ORs etc inside Phrase queries
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1486
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: QueryParser
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Mark Harwood
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.1
>
>         Attachments: ComplexPhraseQueryParser.java, junit_complex_phrase_qp_07_21_2009.patch, junit_complex_phrase_qp_07_22_2009.patch, Lucene-1486 non default field.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, TestComplexPhraseQuery.java
>
>
> An extension to the default QueryParser that overrides the parsing of PhraseQueries to allow more complex syntax e.g. wildcards in phrase queries.
> The implementation feels a little hacky - this is arguably better handled in QueryParser itself. This works as a proof of concept  for much of the query parser syntax. Examples from the Junit test include:
> checkMatches("\"j*   smyth~\"", "1,2"); //wildcards and fuzzies are OK in phrases
> checkMatches("\"(jo* -john)  smith\"", "2"); // boolean logic works
> checkMatches("\"jo*  smith\"~2", "1,2,3"); // position logic works.
>
> checkBadQuery("\"jo*  id:1 smith\""); //mixing fields in a phrase is bad
> checkBadQuery("\"jo* \"smith\" \""); //phrases inside phrases is bad
> checkBadQuery("\"jo* [sma TO smZ]\" \""); //range queries inside phrases not supported
> Code plus Junit test to follow...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@...

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787053#action_12787053 ]

David Kaelbling commented on LUCENE-1486:
-----------------------------------------

Could someone link the new Lucene bug mentioned above to this issue?  I couldn't find it.

> Wildcards, ORs etc inside Phrase queries
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1486
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: QueryParser
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Mark Harwood
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.1
>
>         Attachments: ComplexPhraseQueryParser.java, junit_complex_phrase_qp_07_21_2009.patch, junit_complex_phrase_qp_07_22_2009.patch, Lucene-1486 non default field.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, LUCENE-1486.patch, TestComplexPhraseQuery.java
>
>
> An extension to the default QueryParser that overrides the parsing of PhraseQueries to allow more complex syntax e.g. wildcards in phrase queries.
> The implementation feels a little hacky - this is arguably better handled in QueryParser itself. This works as a proof of concept  for much of the query parser syntax. Examples from the Junit test include:
> checkMatches("\"j*   smyth~\"", "1,2"); //wildcards and fuzzies are OK in phrases
> checkMatches("\"(jo* -john)  smith\"", "2"); // boolean logic works
> checkMatches("\"jo*  smith\"~2", "1,2,3"); // position logic works.
>
> checkBadQuery("\"jo*  id:1 smith\""); //mixing fields in a phrase is bad
> checkBadQuery("\"jo* \"smith\" \""); //phrases inside phrases is bad
> checkBadQuery("\"jo* [sma TO smZ]\" \""); //range queries inside phrases not supported
> Code plus Junit test to follow...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@...