|

»

»

»

[jira] Created: (SOLR-1268) Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter

View: New views

9 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	[jira] Created: (SOLR-1268) Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter by JIRA jira@apache.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter ------------------------------------------ Key: SOLR-1268 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 Project: Solr Issue Type: New Feature Components: highlighter Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi Priority: Minor -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
	[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1268) Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter by JIRA jira@apache.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750080#action_12750080 ] Gabriel Farrell commented on SOLR-1268: --------------------------------------- Voting for this issue because of the following great message from Bess Sadler: One of the feature requests we get pretty often with Blacklight is search term highlighting. The main reason we don't have it yet is because it's a performance drag. We have attempted to add it a couple of times, but it kills performance so much for large collections or large text fields that we had to remove it again. I just had an interesting chat with Erik Hatcher, and he pointed me at this: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/a4deefd915f706d4/highlighting_performance It seems Lucene 2.9 has a faster highlighting solution available now, FastVectorHighlighter. However, it hasn't yet worked its way into solr. If you are one of the people who would like to see search term highlighting (or, maybe just faster search term highlighting) in blacklight, vufind, Fac-Back-OPAC, helios, or any of the many other library apps that use solr, you might want to go vote for the jira issue at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 > Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-1268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: highlighter > Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi > Priority: Minor > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
	[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SOLR-1268) Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter by JIRA jira@apache.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750080#action_12750080 ] Gabriel Farrell edited comment on SOLR-1268 at 9/1/09 1:21 PM: --------------------------------------------------------------- Voting for this issue because of the following email from Bess Sadler, which sums up the need quite well: {quote} One of the feature requests we get pretty often with Blacklight is search term highlighting. The main reason we don't have it yet is because it's a performance drag. We have attempted to add it a couple of times, but it kills performance so much for large collections or large text fields that we had to remove it again. I just had an interesting chat with Erik Hatcher, and he pointed me at this: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/a4deefd915f706d4/highlighting_performance It seems Lucene 2.9 has a faster highlighting solution available now, FastVectorHighlighter. However, it hasn't yet worked its way into solr. If you are one of the people who would like to see search term highlighting (or, maybe just faster search term highlighting) in blacklight, vufind, Fac-Back-OPAC, helios, or any of the many other library apps that use solr, you might want to go vote for the jira issue at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 {quote} was (Author: gsf): Voting for this issue because of the following great message from Bess Sadler: One of the feature requests we get pretty often with Blacklight is search term highlighting. The main reason we don't have it yet is because it's a performance drag. We have attempted to add it a couple of times, but it kills performance so much for large collections or large text fields that we had to remove it again. I just had an interesting chat with Erik Hatcher, and he pointed me at this: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/a4deefd915f706d4/highlighting_performance It seems Lucene 2.9 has a faster highlighting solution available now, FastVectorHighlighter. However, it hasn't yet worked its way into solr. If you are one of the people who would like to see search term highlighting (or, maybe just faster search term highlighting) in blacklight, vufind, Fac-Back-OPAC, helios, or any of the many other library apps that use solr, you might want to go vote for the jira issue at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 > Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-1268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: highlighter > Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi > Priority: Minor > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
	[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SOLR-1268) Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter by JIRA jira@apache.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750080#action_12750080 ] Gabriel Farrell edited comment on SOLR-1268 at 9/1/09 1:21 PM: --------------------------------------------------------------- Voting for this issue because of the following email from Bess Sadler, which sums up the need quite well: {quote} One of the feature requests we get pretty often with Blacklight is search term highlighting. The main reason we don't have it yet is because it's a performance drag. We have attempted to add it a couple of times, but it kills performance so much for large collections or large text fields that we had to remove it again. I just had an interesting chat with Erik Hatcher, and he pointed me at this: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/a4deefd915f706d4/highlighting_performance It seems Lucene 2.9 has a faster highlighting solution available now, FastVectorHighlighter. However, it hasn't yet worked its way into solr. If you are one of the people who would like to see search term highlighting (or, maybe just faster search term highlighting) in blacklight, vufind, Fac-Back-OPAC, helios, or any of the many other library apps that use solr, you might want to go vote for the jira issue at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 {quote} was (Author: gsf): Voting for this issue because of the following email from Bess Sadler, which sums up the need quite well: {quote} One of the feature requests we get pretty often with Blacklight is search term highlighting. The main reason we don't have it yet is because it's a performance drag. We have attempted to add it a couple of times, but it kills performance so much for large collections or large text fields that we had to remove it again. I just had an interesting chat with Erik Hatcher, and he pointed me at this: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/a4deefd915f706d4/highlighting_performance It seems Lucene 2.9 has a faster highlighting solution available now, FastVectorHighlighter. However, it hasn't yet worked its way into solr. If you are one of the people who would like to see search term highlighting (or, maybe just faster search term highlighting) in blacklight, vufind, Fac-Back-OPAC, helios, or any of the many other library apps that use solr, you might want to go vote for the jira issue at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 {quote} > Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-1268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: highlighter > Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi > Priority: Minor > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
	Re: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1268) Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter by Jason Rutherglen-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Gabriel, The most efficient way to improve highlighting is to perform it on a dedicated server? That way it's not impacting the speed of production query execution? -J On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Gabriel Farrell (JIRA)<jira@...> wrote: > > [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750080#action_12750080 ] > > Gabriel Farrell commented on SOLR-1268: > --------------------------------------- > > Voting for this issue because of the following great message from Bess Sadler: > > One of the feature requests we get pretty often with Blacklight is > search term highlighting. The main reason we don't have it yet is > because it's a performance drag. We have attempted to add it a couple > of times, but it kills performance so much for large collections or > large text fields that we had to remove it again. > > I just had an interesting chat with Erik Hatcher, and he pointed me at > this: > http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/a4deefd915f706d4/highlighting_performance > > It seems Lucene 2.9 has a faster highlighting solution available now, > FastVectorHighlighter. However, it hasn't yet worked its way into > solr. If you are one of the people who would like to see search term > highlighting (or, maybe just faster search term highlighting) in > blacklight, vufind, Fac-Back-OPAC, helios, or any of the many other > library apps that use solr, you might want to go vote for the jira > issue at: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 > > >> Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter >> ------------------------------------------ >> >> Key: SOLR-1268 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 >> Project: Solr >> Issue Type: New Feature >> Components: highlighter >> Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi >> Priority: Minor >> > > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > >
	[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1268) Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter by JIRA jira@apache.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750530#action_12750530 ] Nicolas Dessaigne commented on SOLR-1268: ----------------------------------------- In the meantime, you may be interested in the maxChars attribute of copy fields (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-538). It permits fast highlighting if only the beginning of documents. > Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-1268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: highlighter > Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi > Priority: Minor > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
	[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1268) Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter by JIRA jira@apache.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12760509#action_12760509 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1268: --------------------------------------------- Is there a reason why this is not marked for 1.4? > Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-1268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: highlighter > Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi > Priority: Minor > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
	[jira] Assigned: (SOLR-1268) Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter by JIRA jira@apache.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Koji Sekiguchi reassigned SOLR-1268: ------------------------------------ Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi > Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-1268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: highlighter > Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi > Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi > Priority: Minor > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
	[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1268) Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter by JIRA jira@apache.org :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Koji Sekiguchi updated SOLR-1268: --------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 1.5 Mark it to 1.5 because there is no patches. > Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-1268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: highlighter > Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi > Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.5 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.