|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
[jpos-users] packing, unpacking field 127Hello Everybody,
I have some question about field 127, how the sub-fields are packaged into it? do they have specific size and index for each? How do I know that which sub-field is present and which is not? ------- Aatif --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "jPOS Users" group. Please see http://jpos.org/wiki/JPOS_Mailing_List_Readme_first To post to this group, send email to jpos-users@... To unsubscribe, send email to jpos-users+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jpos-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
[jpos-users] Re: packing, unpacking field 127Your specification should tell u that there would be a bitmap for accessing fields inside 127. The field definitions vary from network to network. -Chhil
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "jPOS Users" group. Please see http://jpos.org/wiki/JPOS_Mailing_List_Readme_first To post to this group, send email to jpos-users@... To unsubscribe, send email to jpos-users+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jpos-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
[jpos-users] Re: packing, unpacking field 127ok, I was googling for the same problem when I got this page and saw the following line;
String s = m.getString ("127.2") if you want to get the Switch Key. My question is, what kind of sub-fields' definition is being followed here? Is there any generic schema, if we don't have one specified by our network. Regards, On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Chhil <chillum@...> wrote:
-- ------- Muhammad Aatif Ghafoor Team Lead Developer Paybox Pakistan Pvt. Ltd. 56-XX, DHA Lahore, Pakistan Cell: 92-333-8125575 Tel: 92-42-111-PAYBOX (729269) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "jPOS Users" group. Please see http://jpos.org/wiki/JPOS_Mailing_List_Readme_first To post to this group, send email to jpos-users@... To unsubscribe, send email to jpos-users+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jpos-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
[jpos-users] Re: packing, unpacking field 127M. Aatif Ghafoor wrote: > ok, I was googling for the same problem when I got this > page<http://osdir.com/ml/java.jpos.devel/2008-07/msg00020.html>and > saw the following line; > > *String s = m.getString ("127.2") if you want to get the Switch Key.* > > > My question is, what kind of sub-fields' definition is being followed > here? Looks like this field 127 contains a bitmap. > Is there any generic schema, No, each interface can dictates it's own use (or not) of field 127. As Chhil indicates the structure of your field 127 drives the mechanism of extracting any sub-components. How is your field 127 structured? Does it have a bitmap, or does it contain fixed length mandatory sub-components? > if we don't have one specified by our network. If you have field 127, then you should also have the definition of it's content/structure. This definition must include details of any sub-components and how their presence - if conditional - is indicated. I guess there is something in your field 127 that you want to access? If so, how did you know you needed or where it is to be located? -- Mark --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "jPOS Users" group. Please see http://jpos.org/wiki/JPOS_Mailing_List_Readme_first To post to this group, send email to jpos-users@... To unsubscribe, send email to jpos-users+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jpos-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
[jpos-users] Re: packing, unpacking field 127Look at postpack.xml for this one.
-chhil
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:17 PM, M. Aatif Ghafoor <gaatif@...> wrote: ok, I was googling for the same problem when I got this page and saw the following line; --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "jPOS Users" group. Please see http://jpos.org/wiki/JPOS_Mailing_List_Readme_first To post to this group, send email to jpos-users@... To unsubscribe, send email to jpos-users+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jpos-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |