[patch] typo in Tao.FFmpeg.dll.config

[Sam Hocevar]

   Tao.FFmpeg.dll.config has a typo making it look for libavformat.so.ld
instead of -.1d. Patch attached.

   By the way, we add that 'd' suffix in Debian to libraries that do not
have a very stable API. The real name of the library should probably be
read at build time so that Tao works on other Linux systems.

Regards,
--
Sam.

---

Index: tao/src/Tao.FFmpeg/Tao.FFmpeg.dll.config
===================================================================
--- tao/src/Tao.FFmpeg/Tao.FFmpeg.dll.config (revision 88159)
+++ tao/src/Tao.FFmpeg/Tao.FFmpeg.dll.config (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 <configuration>
  <dllmap dll="avcodec-51.dll" target="libavcodec.so.1d" />
- <dllmap dll="avformat-51.dll" target="libavformat.so.ld" />
+ <dllmap dll="avformat-51.dll" target="libavformat.so.1d" />
  <dllmap dll="avutil-49.dll" target="libavutil.so.1d" />
 </configuration>

---

_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[David_Hudson]

Hi,

Thanks for the patches. I will take a look and patch the code tree. This
list is not used much anymore. You will want to direct any more patches to
the forums at http://taoframework.com.

Are you planning to create a Tao Framework package for Debian? If so that
would be great. I would more than happy to help. I am the one who put all
the config files in (with mixed success apparently) using Debian unstable
as a basis.

Thanks
Dave

tao-list-bounces@... wrote on 10/26/2007 06:39:47 AM:

>    Tao.FFmpeg.dll.config has a typo making it look for libavformat.so.ld
> instead of -.1d. Patch attached.
>
>    By the way, we add that 'd' suffix in Debian to libraries that do not
> have a very stable API. The real name of the library should probably be
> read at build time so that Tao works on other Linux systems.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Sam.
> [attachment "patch-tao-libavformat-typo.diff" deleted by David
> Hudson/INV/CG/CAPITAL] _______________________________________________
> Tao-list mailing list
> Tao-list@...
> http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[Sam Hocevar]

On Fri, Oct 26, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:

> Thanks for the patches. I will take a look and patch the code tree. This
> list is not used much anymore. You will want to direct any more patches to
> the forums at http://taoframework.com.

   Okay, I'll use that in the future. Does no one in the project prefer
mailing-lists over web forums? I mostly do my e-mail offline and it
integrates a lot better with my working habits and I'm sure I'm not the
only one. But I'll adapt if necessary.

> Are you planning to create a Tao Framework package for Debian? If so that
> would be great. I would more than happy to help. I am the one who put all
> the config files in (with mixed success apparently) using Debian unstable
> as a basis.

   Yes, I have working packages now (though not everything works as
expected, for instance I did not manage to get the various
resources.GetObject("$this.Icon") calls to work on Linux. Also I'm not
using the autotools Prebuild system to build tarballs, but the following
script:

 ----- 8< -----
version=$(date +2.0.0.svn%Y%m%d)
pkgdir=tao-$version
rm -Rf $pkgdir
mkdir $pkgdir

for subdir in OpenGl DevIl FFmpeg Lua Ode PhysFs Sdl; do
   (cd src/Tao.$subdir
    rm -Rf autotools
    mono ../../other/Prebuild/Prebuild.exe /target autotools
    cd autotools/Tao.$subdir
    sed -i 's/--add-missing/& --copy/' autogen.sh */autogen.sh
    sed -i 's/\(EXTRA_DIST=\)\(install-sh.*\)/\1"\2"/' configure.ac
    NOCONFIGURE=1 /bin/sh autogen.sh
    cd ../../../../
    mv src/Tao.$subdir/autotools/Tao.$subdir $pkgdir/
    rm -Rf src/Tao.$subdir/autotools)
done

tar czf tao_$version.orig.tar.gz $pkgdir
rm -Rf $pkgdir
 ----- 8< -----

   I came across a lot of packaging issues with Tao in its current state
and I wouldn't miss Prebuild if it went away. I have excellent knowledge
of the autotools system and would be willing to help if necessary,
unfortunately I know nothing about monodevelop and very little about
Visual Studio. We need Debian and Win32 packages of Tao so this is
something on which I could spend company time.

   I am not (yet) a member of the pkg-mono Debian team, but as soon as I
am the packages will appear on svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-mono (and in
the official distribution a bit later, of course).

--
Sam.
_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[David_Hudson]

Hi,

Yes, none of us use the mailing list any more as the primary form of
communication. Feel free to ignore prebuild. I am amazed that you got
anywhere with the autotools/prebuild stuff. That is seriously broken.

As far as Monodevelop/VS 2005 goes, you do not need to know anything about
that. We do not use them for packaging. The main way we package is by using
a NAnt script I wrote. It creates a simple tar.gz file on Unix and a zip
file on Windows. Then I run a NSIS file to create the Windows setup file.
The Windows installer works, but there is no Linux packaging yet, so your
help will be greatly appreciated. Maybe we should get you Mono svn access
so you can just commit the packing changes

Dave

Sam Hocevar <sam@...> wrote on 10/26/2007 03:49:34 PM:

> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the patches. I will take a look and patch the code tree.
This
> > list is not used much anymore. You will want to direct any more patches
to
> > the forums at http://taoframework.com.
>
>    Okay, I'll use that in the future. Does no one in the project prefer
> mailing-lists over web forums? I mostly do my e-mail offline and it
> integrates a lot better with my working habits and I'm sure I'm not the
> only one. But I'll adapt if necessary.
>
> > Are you planning to create a Tao Framework package for Debian? If so
that
> > would be great. I would more than happy to help. I am the one who put
all
> > the config files in (with mixed success apparently) using Debian
unstable

> > as a basis.
>
>    Yes, I have working packages now (though not everything works as
> expected, for instance I did not manage to get the various
> resources.GetObject("$this.Icon") calls to work on Linux. Also I'm not
> using the autotools Prebuild system to build tarballs, but the following
> script:
>
>  ----- 8< -----
> version=$(date +2.0.0.svn%Y%m%d)
> pkgdir=tao-$version
> rm -Rf $pkgdir
> mkdir $pkgdir
>
> for subdir in OpenGl DevIl FFmpeg Lua Ode PhysFs Sdl; do
>    (cd src/Tao.$subdir
>     rm -Rf autotools
>     mono ../../other/Prebuild/Prebuild.exe /target autotools
>     cd autotools/Tao.$subdir
>     sed -i 's/--add-missing/& --copy/' autogen.sh */autogen.sh
>     sed -i 's/\(EXTRA_DIST=\)\(install-sh.*\)/\1"\2"/' configure.ac
>     NOCONFIGURE=1 /bin/sh autogen.sh
>     cd ../../../../
>     mv src/Tao.$subdir/autotools/Tao.$subdir $pkgdir/
>     rm -Rf src/Tao.$subdir/autotools)
> done
>
> tar czf tao_$version.orig.tar.gz $pkgdir
> rm -Rf $pkgdir
>  ----- 8< -----
>
>    I came across a lot of packaging issues with Tao in its current state
> and I wouldn't miss Prebuild if it went away. I have excellent knowledge
> of the autotools system and would be willing to help if necessary,
> unfortunately I know nothing about monodevelop and very little about
> Visual Studio. We need Debian and Win32 packages of Tao so this is
> something on which I could spend company time.
>
>    I am not (yet) a member of the pkg-mono Debian team, but as soon as I
> am the packages will appear on svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-mono (and in
> the official distribution a bit later, of course).
>
> --
> Sam.

_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[David_Hudson]

Hi,

I have patched the Tao tree. Thanks! Feel free to send me anymore build
patches for a Debian package. I will put them in and test them. I use
Debian unstable as a secondary platform.

I suggest that we drop prebuild though. It's value has gone down since
sharpdevelop and monodevelop now use VS2005 solution files.

Dave

Sam Hocevar <sam@...> wrote on 10/26/2007 03:49:34 PM:

> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the patches. I will take a look and patch the code tree.
This
> > list is not used much anymore. You will want to direct any more patches
to
> > the forums at http://taoframework.com.
>
>    Okay, I'll use that in the future. Does no one in the project prefer
> mailing-lists over web forums? I mostly do my e-mail offline and it
> integrates a lot better with my working habits and I'm sure I'm not the
> only one. But I'll adapt if necessary.
>
> > Are you planning to create a Tao Framework package for Debian? If so
that
> > would be great. I would more than happy to help. I am the one who put
all
> > the config files in (with mixed success apparently) using Debian
unstable

> > as a basis.
>
>    Yes, I have working packages now (though not everything works as
> expected, for instance I did not manage to get the various
> resources.GetObject("$this.Icon") calls to work on Linux. Also I'm not
> using the autotools Prebuild system to build tarballs, but the following
> script:
>
>  ----- 8< -----
> version=$(date +2.0.0.svn%Y%m%d)
> pkgdir=tao-$version
> rm -Rf $pkgdir
> mkdir $pkgdir
>
> for subdir in OpenGl DevIl FFmpeg Lua Ode PhysFs Sdl; do
>    (cd src/Tao.$subdir
>     rm -Rf autotools
>     mono ../../other/Prebuild/Prebuild.exe /target autotools
>     cd autotools/Tao.$subdir
>     sed -i 's/--add-missing/& --copy/' autogen.sh */autogen.sh
>     sed -i 's/\(EXTRA_DIST=\)\(install-sh.*\)/\1"\2"/' configure.ac
>     NOCONFIGURE=1 /bin/sh autogen.sh
>     cd ../../../../
>     mv src/Tao.$subdir/autotools/Tao.$subdir $pkgdir/
>     rm -Rf src/Tao.$subdir/autotools)
> done
>
> tar czf tao_$version.orig.tar.gz $pkgdir
> rm -Rf $pkgdir
>  ----- 8< -----
>
>    I came across a lot of packaging issues with Tao in its current state
> and I wouldn't miss Prebuild if it went away. I have excellent knowledge
> of the autotools system and would be willing to help if necessary,
> unfortunately I know nothing about monodevelop and very little about
> Visual Studio. We need Debian and Win32 packages of Tao so this is
> something on which I could spend company time.
>
>    I am not (yet) a member of the pkg-mono Debian team, but as soon as I
> am the packages will appear on svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-mono (and in
> the official distribution a bit later, of course).
>
> --
> Sam.

_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[Sam Hocevar]

On Fri, Oct 26, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:

> I have patched the Tao tree. Thanks! Feel free to send me anymore build
> patches for a Debian package. I will put them in and test them. I use
> Debian unstable as a secondary platform.

   So far no real changes are needed to build Debian packages. You can
find mine here until I manage to get them in the official tree:

     http://people.zoy.org/~sam/mono/tao-2.0.0.svn20071027/

> I suggest that we drop prebuild though. It's value has gone down since
> sharpdevelop and monodevelop now use VS2005 solution files.

   As I already said, I don't mind seeing prebuild go. What is the
expected strategy? Have a VS2005 solution and autotools scripts? Or
just the VS part? I can volunteer to maintain autotools scripts if the
problem of maintenance is a blocker.

Regards,
--
Sam.
_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[Vitor Hugo Barros]

Hello!


I think you should mantain debian packages...

I use monodevelop on ubuntu and, despite its supports for VS2005 files, I don't think we should rely (at least only) on that...

What will happen when VS2008 get out and all the windows developers start its solutions?

I don't believe monodevelop, neither sharpdevelop, will support them right then...


Just my 2 cent...

Vitor Hugo Barros

On 10/27/07, Sam Hocevar <sam@...> wrote:

On Fri, Oct 26, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:

> I have patched the Tao tree. Thanks! Feel free to send me anymore build
> patches for a Debian package. I will put them in and test them. I use
> Debian unstable as a secondary platform.

   So far no real changes are needed to build Debian packages. You can
find mine here until I manage to get them in the official tree:

     http://people.zoy.org/~sam/mono/tao-2.0.0.svn20071027/

> I suggest that we drop prebuild though. It's value has gone down since
> sharpdevelop and monodevelop now use VS2005 solution files.

   As I already said, I don't mind seeing prebuild go. What is the
expected strategy? Have a VS2005 solution and autotools scripts? Or
just the VS part? I can volunteer to maintain autotools scripts if the
problem of maintenance is a blocker.

Regards,
--
Sam.
_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[Dave Bacher]

Hi,

 

VS 2008 project files (*csproj, etc.) are unchanged -- they're still MS Build files.

 

VS 2008 solution files (*sln) have additional settings to provide multi-targeting (the ability to target different OS/Framework combinations from a single sln file).  

 

As long as nothing keys off the version number, and as long as the parser discards unknown settings, #Develop should be fine with a VS 2008 project file.

 

 

 

From: vitor.h.barros@...

Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 2:23 PM

To: sam@...

Cc: David_Hudson@... ; tao-list@...

Subject: Re: [Tao-list] [patch] typo in Tao.FFmpeg.dll.config

Hello!


I think you should mantain debian packages...

I use monodevelop on ubuntu and, despite its supports for VS2005 files, I don't think we should rely (at least only) on that...

What will happen when VS2008 get out and all the windows developers start its solutions?

I don't believe monodevelop, neither sharpdevelop, will support them right then...


Just my 2 cent...

Vitor Hugo Barros

On 10/27/07, Sam Hocevar <sam@...> wrote:

On Fri, Oct 26, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:

> I have patched the Tao tree. Thanks! Feel free to send me anymore build
> patches for a Debian package. I will put them in and test them. I use
> Debian unstable as a secondary platform.

   So far no real changes are needed to build Debian packages. You can
find mine here until I manage to get them in the official tree:

     http://people.zoy.org/~sam/mono/tao-2.0.0.svn20071027/

> I suggest that we drop prebuild though. It's value has gone down since
> sharpdevelop and monodevelop now use VS2005 solution files.

   As I already said, I don't mind seeing prebuild go. What is the
expected strategy? Have a VS2005 solution and autotools scripts? Or
just the VS part? I can volunteer to maintain autotools scripts if the
problem of maintenance is a blocker.

Regards,
--
Sam.
_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

---

_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[David_Hudson]

Basically, there are two build scenarios. Most developers that work with
Tao may rebuild Tao without the intent of repackaging it. Most of them will
use an IDE (VS2005, SharpDev or Monodev). Therefore keeping around the
VS2005 solution is essential.

Some developers (like myself) are interested in packaging Tao and/or like
to use autotools on Linux. I would prefer to use NAnt for packaging on
Windows. On Linux, autotools would be ideal since that would help the
project get into some distros.

So basically what I propose is that I maintain VS2005, and NAnt and you
maintain the autotools build. That would be bery helpful. If the autotools
build works well under Cygwin (I used to get some line ending issues
before), may be we could even ditch the NAnt scripts on Windows. We'll see
about that though.

Let me know what you think. Maintaining the autotools build would be a BIG
HELP!

Thanks
Dave


tao-list-bounces@... wrote on 10/27/2007 09:07:19 AM:

> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:
>
> > I have patched the Tao tree. Thanks! Feel free to send me anymore build
> > patches for a Debian package. I will put them in and test them. I use
> > Debian unstable as a secondary platform.
>
>    So far no real changes are needed to build Debian packages. You can
> find mine here until I manage to get them in the official tree:
>
>      http://people.zoy.org/~sam/mono/tao-2.0.0.svn20071027/
>
> > I suggest that we drop prebuild though. It's value has gone down since
> > sharpdevelop and monodevelop now use VS2005 solution files.
>
>    As I already said, I don't mind seeing prebuild go. What is the
> expected strategy? Have a VS2005 solution and autotools scripts? Or
> just the VS part? I can volunteer to maintain autotools scripts if the
> problem of maintenance is a blocker.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Sam.
> _______________________________________________
> Tao-list mailing list
> Tao-list@...
> http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[David_Hudson]

Hi,

I have been taking a look at the patches in your tree and have applied some
of them (config file, dllimport). I see that the patch creates a lot of
debian files. I was thinking of putting those into the Tao svn. What do you
think? I figure that would give them some extra visibility to the rest of
the Tao team. We can also get you added as a developer. Should these files
be checked in under a tao/debian directory?

Thanks for all of your work on this. It will be great to get an autotool
build and a debian package.

Thanks
Dave

tao-list-bounces@... wrote on 10/27/2007 09:07:19 AM:

> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:
>
> > I have patched the Tao tree. Thanks! Feel free to send me anymore build
> > patches for a Debian package. I will put them in and test them. I use
> > Debian unstable as a secondary platform.
>
>    So far no real changes are needed to build Debian packages. You can
> find mine here until I manage to get them in the official tree:
>
>      http://people.zoy.org/~sam/mono/tao-2.0.0.svn20071027/
>
> > I suggest that we drop prebuild though. It's value has gone down since
> > sharpdevelop and monodevelop now use VS2005 solution files.
>
>    As I already said, I don't mind seeing prebuild go. What is the
> expected strategy? Have a VS2005 solution and autotools scripts? Or
> just the VS part? I can volunteer to maintain autotools scripts if the
> problem of maintenance is a blocker.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Sam.
> _______________________________________________
> Tao-list mailing list
> Tao-list@...
> http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[Sam Hocevar]

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:

> I have been taking a look at the patches in your tree and have applied some
> of them (config file, dllimport). I see that the patch creates a lot of
> debian files. I was thinking of putting those into the Tao svn. What do you
> think?

   I personally don't care much where the Debian packaging is made as
long as I have write access :-)  However, since there are many people in
the Debian Mono packaging team[1], it could be impractical to have the
main packaging area in a repository where the rest of the team cannot
commit.

   If you think however that the packaging information can benefit other
Tao users, then I see no problem with copying the information to the
Mono SVN, except that if someone makes a modification to the Debian tree
I may not notice it immediately and the synchronisation will be delayed.
Also I may disagree with a modification that is made to the Mono tree
that I would not wish to merge back into the Debian tree, which would be
another cause of desync.

   Another solution is to use the svn:external property. That ensures
that the debian/ directory is visible to Tao SVN users and that they are
always in sync.

[1] http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-mono/

> I figure that would give them some extra visibility to the rest of
> the Tao team. We can also get you added as a developer. Should these files
> be checked in under a tao/debian directory?

   I'd be very happy to become a developer, all the more because I have
yet unapplied patches for gtkglarea-sharp, although I am not sure what
the policy is for cross-project commit rules.

   As for the debian/ directory, it's your call: I don't mind any way.
The distribution packager's work will be easened anyway when I have some
working autotools solution, though.

> Thanks for all of your work on this. It will be great to get an autotool
> build and a debian package.

   You're welcome. It's not totally altruistic though: my company really
needs Tao to work and to easily build everywhere :-)

Cheers,
--
Sam.
_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[Sam Hocevar]

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:

> Some developers (like myself) are interested in packaging Tao and/or like
> to use autotools on Linux. I would prefer to use NAnt for packaging on
> Windows. On Linux, autotools would be ideal since that would help the
> project get into some distros.
>
> So basically what I propose is that I maintain VS2005, and NAnt and you
> maintain the autotools build. That would be bery helpful. If the autotools
> build works well under Cygwin (I used to get some line ending issues
> before), may be we could even ditch the NAnt scripts on Windows. We'll see
> about that though.

   That would be perfect. We build the rest of Mono and GTK# using
cygwin anyway, even if only the cygwin tools such as bash, autoconf
etc. (the libraries we use are the Windows native ones, though that does
not matter much for C#) We don't want the cygwin.dll overhead anywhere
in our software after it's been built.

   I'll let you know when I have a proper autotools proposal.

--
Sam.
_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[David_Hudson]

Hi Sam,

It looks like you have uploaded TaoFramework into the Debian repository.
Any idea how long it will take to get accepted? Great work, BTW! You may
already know but there have been some updates in SVN since the snapshot you
have used. Notably, Tao.Ode has been updated to 0.8 (the same version that
is in Debian). Tao.OpenGl has also been updated. I took the patches that
you had been using and applied them to the Tao svn. I am holding off on the
resources patch though.

I think the next step for the Tao SVN is to drop prebuild and incorporate
the makefiles, *.in etc that you are using. Per the previous emails, the
/debian directory will not be directory incorporated into the Tao SVN, but
it would be nice to have the makefiles in there.

Let me know what you think.

Thanks
Dave

tao-list-bounces@... wrote on 11/07/2007 12:31:33 PM:

> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:
>
> > Some developers (like myself) are interested in packaging Tao and/or
like
> > to use autotools on Linux. I would prefer to use NAnt for packaging on
> > Windows. On Linux, autotools would be ideal since that would help the
> > project get into some distros.
> >
> > So basically what I propose is that I maintain VS2005, and NAnt and you
> > maintain the autotools build. That would be bery helpful. If the
autotools
> > build works well under Cygwin (I used to get some line ending issues
> > before), may be we could even ditch the NAnt scripts on Windows. We'll
see

> > about that though.
>
>    That would be perfect. We build the rest of Mono and GTK# using
> cygwin anyway, even if only the cygwin tools such as bash, autoconf
> etc. (the libraries we use are the Windows native ones, though that does
> not matter much for C#) We don't want the cygwin.dll overhead anywhere
> in our software after it's been built.
>
>    I'll let you know when I have a proper autotools proposal.
>
> --
> Sam.
> _______________________________________________
> Tao-list mailing list
> Tao-list@...
> http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[Sam Hocevar]

On Mon, Nov 26, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:

> It looks like you have uploaded TaoFramework into the Debian repository.
> Any idea how long it will take to get accepted? Great work, BTW! You may
> already know but there have been some updates in SVN since the snapshot you
> have used. Notably, Tao.Ode has been updated to 0.8 (the same version that
> is in Debian). Tao.OpenGl has also been updated. I took the patches that
> you had been using and applied them to the Tao svn. I am holding off on the
> resources patch though.

   It usually takes between 2 days and 2 weeks, depending on the
availability of the FTP masters in charge of reviewing new packages.

   I know the SVN snapshot I have been using is not very recent, but
it's the version we have been using at work and I didn't want to send
anything that had not been somewhat used before. But when the first
package is validated, I will switch to more frequent uploads.

> I think the next step for the Tao SVN is to drop prebuild and incorporate
> the makefiles, *.in etc that you are using. Per the previous emails, the
> /debian directory will not be directory incorporated into the Tao SVN, but
> it would be nice to have the makefiles in there.

   I am not yet finished with autotoolising Tao, but I'll yet you know
about my progress.

Cheers,
--
Sam.
_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[David_Hudson]

Sounds good. One other thing I forgot to mention, the Tao SVN repo was
moved to sourceforge.
(https://taoframework.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/taoframework/trunk).
Use that repo for any more recent versions of the code. I also added your
build script (debian.sh in the root dir) so I could try it out. If you want
SVN access, let me know your Sourceforge ID and I can add you as a dev.

Thanks
Dave

tao-list-bounces@... wrote on 11/26/2007 11:14:57 AM:

> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:
>
> > It looks like you have uploaded TaoFramework into the Debian
repository.
> > Any idea how long it will take to get accepted? Great work, BTW! You
may
> > already know but there have been some updates in SVN since the snapshot
you
> > have used. Notably, Tao.Ode has been updated to 0.8 (the same version
that
> > is in Debian). Tao.OpenGl has also been updated. I took the patches
that
> > you had been using and applied them to the Tao svn. I am holding off on
the

> > resources patch though.
>
>    It usually takes between 2 days and 2 weeks, depending on the
> availability of the FTP masters in charge of reviewing new packages.
>
>    I know the SVN snapshot I have been using is not very recent, but
> it's the version we have been using at work and I didn't want to send
> anything that had not been somewhat used before. But when the first
> package is validated, I will switch to more frequent uploads.
>
> > I think the next step for the Tao SVN is to drop prebuild and

incorporate
> > the makefiles, *.in etc that you are using. Per the previous emails,
the
> > /debian directory will not be directory incorporated into the Tao SVN,
but

> > it would be nice to have the makefiles in there.
>
>    I am not yet finished with autotoolising Tao, but I'll yet you know
> about my progress.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Sam.
> _______________________________________________
> Tao-list mailing list
> Tao-list@...
> http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[Sam Hocevar]

On Mon, Nov 26, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:
> Sounds good. One other thing I forgot to mention, the Tao SVN repo was
> moved to sourceforge.
> (https://taoframework.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/taoframework/trunk).

   Thanks; I had seen the announcement thought.

> Use that repo for any more recent versions of the code. I also added your
> build script (debian.sh in the root dir) so I could try it out. If you want
> SVN access, let me know your Sourceforge ID and I can add you as a dev.

   Sure, my ID is "sammy".

Thanks,
--
Sam.
_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list

[David_Hudson]

Done. Feel free to add makefiles and such to the Tao SVN.

Thanks
Dave

Sam Hocevar <sam@...> wrote on 11/26/2007 12:06:12 PM:

> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007, David_Hudson@... wrote:
> > Sounds good. One other thing I forgot to mention, the Tao SVN repo was
> > moved to sourceforge.
> > (https://taoframework.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/taoframework/trunk).
>
>    Thanks; I had seen the announcement thought.
>
> > Use that repo for any more recent versions of the code. I also added
your
> > build script (debian.sh in the root dir) so I could try it out. If you
want
> > SVN access, let me know your Sourceforge ID and I can add you as a dev.
>
>    Sure, my ID is "sammy".
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Sam.

_______________________________________________
Tao-list mailing list
Tao-list@...
http://galactus.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/tao-list