[rvm-research] Concurrent GC

View: New views
2 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

[rvm-research] Concurrent GC

by Cristian Perfumo :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi all,

Reading some documentation about Jikes (in fact, about the MMTk). I find this phrase: The RVM does not currently support concurrent garbage collection on http://jikesrvm.org/MMTk

However, when I look at the code, I see there is org.plan.concurrent.marksweep. So I was wondering whether the sentence is out-of-date or the code for this concurrent GC does not work properly.

Thanks in advance for any help.

Cristian



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
_______________________________________________
Jikesrvm-researchers mailing list
Jikesrvm-researchers@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jikesrvm-researchers

Re: [rvm-research] Concurrent GC

by Daniel Frampton :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

MMTk does not currently have an implementation of concurrent
collection (although there is no fundamental problem preventing one
being implemented).

A limited version of concurrent GC was available in previous releases,
but has not been updated since the change to native threads and so was
removed for revision 3.1.

Concurrent GC is something that will be supported in the future, but I
can not guarantee when.

Cheers,
Daniel.

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Cristian Perfumo<cperfumo@...> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Reading some documentation about Jikes (in fact, about the MMTk). I find
> this phrase: The RVM does not currently support concurrent garbage
> collection on http://jikesrvm.org/MMTk
>
> However, when I look at the code, I see there is
> org.plan.concurrent.marksweep. So I was wondering whether the sentence is
> out-of-date or the code for this concurrent GC does not work properly.
>
> Thanks in advance for any help.
>
> Cristian
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge
> conference!
> Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference:
> $250.
> Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
> _______________________________________________
> Jikesrvm-researchers mailing list
> Jikesrvm-researchers@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jikesrvm-researchers
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
_______________________________________________
Jikesrvm-researchers mailing list
Jikesrvm-researchers@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jikesrvm-researchers