2.90 branch

[Javier Jardón]

Hello,

I've read here [1] about the creation of a GTK+ branch for GTK+
2.90/3.0 development after 2.14 has been released.
GTK+ 2.18 has been released and I think that no branch was created, is
there any plans to create that branch soon?

Best Regards

[1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/3.0/Tasks#Q0

--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

[Christian Dywan-3]

Am Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:04:54 +0200
schrieb Javier Jardón <javierjc1982@...>:

> Hello,
>
> I've read here [1] about the creation of a GTK+ branch for GTK+
> 2.90/3.0 development after 2.14 has been released.
> GTK+ 2.18 has been released and I think that no branch was created, is
> there any plans to create that branch soon?
>
> Best Regards
>
> [1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/3.0/Tasks#Q0

Hey Javier,

I actually started to look into doing that this week. I think we have
resolved all but a handful of sealing/ accessor issues at this point,
and at least some of the GTK+ hackers seem to share the sentiment. So I
think it's a good time.

So I guess I should try to organize this a bit, and see if I can
attract some bears to the honey.

I started a local branch gtk-2.90, where I began to remove deprecated
classes and functions which basically is #Q1.

Question: do others agree, and can I push the branch to git.gnome.org
so everybody can join the effort?

A GTK+ meeting would probably be a good idea, to plan 2.20/ 2.90.

Emmanuelle, do you want to revive the meeting?

ciao,
    Christian
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

[Emmanuele Bassi]

On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 18:47 +0200, Christian Dywan wrote:

> I started a local branch gtk-2.90, where I began to remove deprecated
> classes and functions which basically is #Q1.
>
> Question: do others agree, and can I push the branch to git.gnome.org
> so everybody can join the effort?

having a branch would surely be good.

> A GTK+ meeting would probably be a good idea, to plan 2.20/ 2.90.
>
> Emmanuelle, do you want to revive the meeting?

sure. I asked around on #gtk+ after GUADEC for the best day/time to
maximize attendance - the default being on Tuesday at 20:00 UTC. if
anyone has issues with the day/time then feel free to contact me either
on gtk-devel-list, in private or on IRC. otherwise, we can have a IRC
meeting next Tuesday (October 6th); this should give people enough time
to schedule stuff around. :-)

ciao,
 Emmanuele.

--
Emmanuele Bassi,
W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name
B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi

_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

[Alberto Ruiz-4]

2009/9/30 Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@...>:
> sure. I asked around on #gtk+ after GUADEC for the best day/time to
> maximize attendance - the default being on Tuesday at 20:00 UTC. if
> anyone has issues with the day/time then feel free to contact me either
> on gtk-devel-list, in private or on IRC. otherwise, we can have a IRC
> meeting next Tuesday (October 6th); this should give people enough time
> to schedule stuff around. :-)

+1

> ciao,
>  Emmanuele.
>
> --
> Emmanuele Bassi,
> W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name
> B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list@...
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>

--
Un saludo,
Alberto Ruiz
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

[Christian Dywan-3]

Am Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:47:48 +0200
schrieb Christian Dywan <christian@...>:

> Am Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:04:54 +0200
> schrieb Javier Jardón <javierjc1982@...>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've read here [1] about the creation of a GTK+ branch for GTK+
> > 2.90/3.0 development after 2.14 has been released.
> > GTK+ 2.18 has been released and I think that no branch was created,
> > is there any plans to create that branch soon?
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > [1] http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/3.0/Tasks#Q0
>
> Hey Javier,
>
> I actually started to look into doing that this week. I think we have
> resolved all but a handful of sealing/ accessor issues at this point,
> and at least some of the GTK+ hackers seem to share the sentiment. So
> I think it's a good time.
>
> So I guess I should try to organize this a bit, and see if I can
> attract some bears to the honey.
>
> I started a local branch gtk-2.90, where I began to remove deprecated
> classes and functions which basically is #Q1.
>
> Question: do others agree, and can I push the branch to git.gnome.org
> so everybody can join the effort?

For the record, I pushed the gtk-2.90 branch now, it "almost" compiles,
that is I need to fix GtkInputDialog which uses deprecated functions
and a few tests also still use old API.

Anybody is welcome to help out, preferrably poke here or poke me in
#gtk+ (kalikiana) before so we don't end up duplicating work.

I rebased the branch once so far, Emanuelle offered to do that in the
future.

There's also http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/3.0/Tasks in the wiki. What I
did so far is #Q0, creating the branch, and #Q1, removing deprecated
code.

ciao,
    Christian

_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list