3.0.4 RC3

[Jaroslav Hajek-2]

hello,

the octave 3.0.4 rc3 tarballs are available from the usual location:
http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~hajej2am/ulozna/octave/

sorry for the longer delays. I've only recently discovered a day is
limited to 24 hours.

cheers

--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz

[Marco atzeri-3]

--- Jaroslav Hajek ha scritto:

> hello,
>
> the octave 3.0.4 rc3 tarballs are available from the
> usual location:
>
http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~hajej2am/ulozna/octave/

>
> sorry for the longer delays. I've only recently
> discovered a day is
> limited to 24 hours.
>
> cheers
>
> --
> RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
> computing expert
> Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
> Prague, Czech Republic
> url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
>

Hi Jaroslav,

for cygwin is fine
the only fail is the already known :

  ***** assert (nchoosek(100,45), bincoeff(100,45),
-1e-14)
!!!!! test failed
error: assert (nchoosek (100, 45),bincoeff (100,
45),-1e-14) expected
 6.1448e+28
but got
 6.1448e+28
maximum relative error 2.83429e-14 exceeds tolerance
1e-14
>>

Thanks
Marco



     

[Tatsuro MATSUOKA-2]

Hello Jaroslav Hajek

Thank you for your efforts.

I have tested 3.0.4 RC3 using mingw-3.4.5.

Integrated test scripts:

  d:\usr\Tatsu\mingwhome\octaves\octave-3.0.4RC3\src\ov-fcn-handle.cc  PASS    2/3    FAIL 1
  d:\usr\Tatsu\mingwhome\octaves\octave-3.0.4RC3\scripts/miscellaneous\fileparts.m  PASS    6/9  
FAIL 3
  test_string.m .......................................... PASS  130/131  FAIL 1


  test_string.m .......................................... PASS  130/131  FAIL 1
This was already reported as No.4
http://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2009-January/010166.html

--- a/ChangeLog Tue Aug 19 16:15:52 2008 -0400
+++ b/ChangeLog Fri Aug 22 13:37:16 2008 +0900
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
[phone]  Tatsuro MATSUOKA  <tmacchant at ...>
+
+       test/octave.test/string/isprint-1.m in test_string.m for fixed.
+
 2008-08-19  Jaroslav Hajek <highegg at ...>
 
        Version 3.0.2 released.
diff -r 4908e39553b0 test/test_string.m
--- a/test/test_string.m        Tue Aug 19 16:15:52 2008 -0400
+++ b/test/test_string.m        Fri Aug 22 13:37:16 2008 +0900
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@
 %! result = zeros (1, 128);
 %!
 %! result (33:127) = 1;
-%! if (ispc () && ! isunix ())
+%! if (size(findstr (octave_config_info('canonical_host_type'), 'msvc'),2))
 %!   result(10) = 1;
 %! endif
 %!



--- Jaroslav Hajek wrote:

> hello,
>
> the octave 3.0.4 rc3 tarballs are available from the usual location:
> http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~hajej2am/ulozna/octave/
>
> sorry for the longer delays. I've only recently discovered a day is
> limited to 24 hours.
>
> cheers
>
> --
> RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
> computing expert
> Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
> Prague, Czech Republic
> url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
>

--------------------------------------
Power up the Internet with Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/

[Rafael Laboissiere]

* Jaroslav Hajek <highegg@...> [2009-01-29 09:59]:

> the octave 3.0.4 rc3 tarballs are available from the usual location:
> http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~hajej2am/ulozna/octave/

Great, thanks.  It builds fine, all tests on my Debian unstable system, and,
the most wonderful thing, all *.png files are there! :-)

I uploaded the Debian package to the experimental distribution.  It will
soon appear here:

    http://packages.debian.org/experimental/octave3.0

Debian users can give a try to this RC without having to build it.

Cheers,

--
Rafael

[Benjamin Lindner]

> hello,
>
> the octave 3.0.4 rc3 tarballs are available from the usual location:
> http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~hajej2am/ulozna/octave/
>


Out of curiosity, what's the revision of this tarball in the 3.0.x
repository?

An up-to-date pull+update shows me
 > hg tip
changeset:   7670:f5d4b1d6d4e6
tag:         tip
user:        Jaroslav Hajek <highegg@...>
date:        Fri Jan 23 14:10:55 2009 +0100
summary:     use relative tols in randp tests

There seems to be no tag for 3.0.4-rc3
 > hg tags
tip                             7670:f5d4b1d6d4e6
release-3-0-3                   7599:152a68291b66
release-3-0-2                   7544:928193724f3b
release-3-0-1                   7498:57504aa0461e
...


I'm asking because for me it is easier and faster to update my
repository, rebuild and call make check, than doing a completely fresh
build from a tarball.

benjamin

[Tatsuro MATSUOKA-2]

Hello

The modification is not apropriate so that nchoosek.m test still cause an error.

http://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2009-January/010175.html
not -1e-14 but -1e-13, I think

Please apply patch the last part of this mail

BTW
Hi Marco!

The file of 'ReadmeCygwin' in 3.0.4RC3 source have not been revised, please send the patch for it.

Regards

Tatsuro

--- ./octave-3.0.4RC3-org/scripts/specfun/nchoosek.m    2009-01-29 16:49:00.000000000 +0900
+++ ./octave-3.0.4RC3/scripts/specfun/nchoosek.m        2009-01-31 12:50:54.838000000 +0900
@@ -96,5 +96,5 @@
   endif
 endfunction

-%!assert (nchoosek(100,45), bincoeff(100,45), -1e-14)
+%!assert (nchoosek(100,45), bincoeff(100,45), -1e-13)
 %!assert (nchoosek(1:5,3),[1:3;1,2,4;1,2,5;1,3,4;1,3,5;1,4,5;2:4;2,3,5;2,4,5;3:5])

--- Marco Atzeri wrote:

>
> --- Jaroslav Hajek ha scritto:
>
> > hello,
> >
> > the octave 3.0.4 rc3 tarballs are available from the
> > usual location:
> >
> http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~hajej2am/ulozna/octave/
> >
> > sorry for the longer delays. I've only recently
> > discovered a day is
> > limited to 24 hours.
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > --
> > RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
> > computing expert
> > Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
> > Prague, Czech Republic
> > url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
> >
> Hi Jaroslav,
>
> for cygwin is fine
> the only fail is the already known :
>
>   ***** assert (nchoosek(100,45), bincoeff(100,45),
> -1e-14)
> !!!!! test failed
> error: assert (nchoosek (100, 45),bincoeff (100,
> 45),-1e-14) expected
>  6.1448e+28
> but got
>  6.1448e+28
> maximum relative error 2.83429e-14 exceeds tolerance
> 1e-14
> >>
>
> Thanks
> Marco
>
>
>
>      
>

--------------------------------------
Power up the Internet with Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/

[Bill Denney-4]

Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> Hello
>
> The modification is not apropriate so that nchoosek.m test still cause an error.
>
> http://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2009-January/010175.html
> not -1e-14 but -1e-13, I think
Hi,

It's probably better to use eps() as the reference. For me, 100*eps ()
passes the test, but 1000*eps () is closer to 1e-13.

Have a good day,

Bill