|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
3.2.1 release candidate 4hi all
the Octave 3.2.1 RC4 tarballs are available at http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~hajej2am/ulozna/octave/ changes since RC3: changeset: 9370:66bfdfa80f96 user: Jaroslav Hajek <highegg@...> date: Tue Jun 30 09:03:56 2009 +0200 summary: remove assertion in force_variable changeset: 9371:6ad2fc3f5f4f user: Joe Rothweiler <octaveuser@...> date: Thu Jul 02 06:31:29 2009 +0200 summary: fix kbhit(1) to not discard waiting keystrokes changeset: 9372:4b5cad146175 user: David Bateman <dbateman@...> date: Thu Jul 02 06:31:29 2009 +0200 summary: Fix 'format rat' for values like '1 - eps' changeset: 9373:8ace139c0787 user: Jaroslav Hajek <highegg@...> date: Thu Jul 02 08:21:50 2009 +0200 summary: fix sparse +- diag operations changeset: 9374:23c34f41c934 user: Jaroslav Hajek <highegg@...> date: Thu Jul 02 11:32:27 2009 +0200 summary: use proper empty value in Cell::index changeset: 9375:eb70a8e1c218 tag: 3-2-1-rc4 tag: qparent user: Jaroslav Hajek <highegg@...> date: Thu Jul 02 13:43:46 2009 +0200 summary: allow which look for files on path Unless a serious problem is reported, RC4 will become the 3.2.1 release tomorrow or on Saturday. cheers -- RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek computing expert & GNU Octave developer Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU) Prague, Czech Republic url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz |
|
|
Re: 3.2.1 release candidate 4Would it be possible to include a bugfix for this topic (if there is already one):
http://www.nabble.com/Error-with-function-handles-of-object-methods-to24185732.html ? Without that working function handles, a lot of usefull stuff will not work. E.g., if you have a cell array of ojects, you can use the cellfun function to let all objects do a certain operation. I'm working in mobile comunications and my objects are mobilestations, basestations, etc. Together with parcellfun() from Octaveforcge there are powerfull options available, but only with function handles of object methods which gives only an error in octave v3.2 . W. |
|
|
Re: 3.2.1 release candidate 4On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:59 PM, WMennerich<W.Mennerich@...> wrote:
> > Would it be possible to include a bugfix for this topic: > http://www.nabble.com/Error-with-function-handles-of-object-methods-to24185732.html > ? First of all, it is obviously only possible to apply patches that exist, and I'm not aware of any. Second, I think this is more of a missing feature than a bug. I intend to address this eventually and already have an (hopefully) elegant idea how to do it, but I'm not sure this will go into 3.2.x at all. Surely not 3.2.1, which is just behind the door. > Without that working function handles, a lot of usefull stuff will not work. > E.g., if you have a cell array of ojects, you can use the cellfun function > to let all objects do a certain operation. A possible workaround is to use @(varargin) method(varargin{:}) rather than @method. This is less efficient and less readable, but at least working. > I'm working in mobile comunications and my objects are mobilestations, > basestations, etc. > Together with parcellfun() from Octaveforcge there are powerfull options > available, but only with function handles of object methods which gives only > an error in octave v3.2 . > > W. If you really miss a particular feature, your most straightforward options are: 1. implement it yourself 2. make a donation for someone to do it for you and make it a priority 3. just wait regards -- RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek computing expert & GNU Octave developer Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU) Prague, Czech Republic url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz |
|
|
Re: 3.2.1 release candidate 4Hello
I have built octave3.2.1-rc4 with Mingw-GCC-4.3.3-TDM-dw2. d:\usr\Tatsu\mingwhome\octaves\octave-3.2.1-rc4\src\data.cc PASS 500/509 FAIL 9 test_string.m .......................................... PASS 78/79 FAIL 1 Summary: PASS 5730 FAIL 10 The above failures are already known. Regards Tatsuro --- Jaroslav Hajek <highegg@...> wrote: > hi all > > the Octave 3.2.1 RC4 tarballs are available at > http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~hajej2am/ulozna/octave/ > > changes since RC3: > changeset: 9370:66bfdfa80f96 > user: Jaroslav Hajek <highegg@...> > date: Tue Jun 30 09:03:56 2009 +0200 > summary: remove assertion in force_variable > > changeset: 9371:6ad2fc3f5f4f > user: Joe Rothweiler <octaveuser@...> > date: Thu Jul 02 06:31:29 2009 +0200 > summary: fix kbhit(1) to not discard waiting keystrokes > > changeset: 9372:4b5cad146175 > user: David Bateman <dbateman@...> > date: Thu Jul 02 06:31:29 2009 +0200 > summary: Fix 'format rat' for values like '1 - eps' > > changeset: 9373:8ace139c0787 > user: Jaroslav Hajek <highegg@...> > date: Thu Jul 02 08:21:50 2009 +0200 > summary: fix sparse +- diag operations > > changeset: 9374:23c34f41c934 > user: Jaroslav Hajek <highegg@...> > date: Thu Jul 02 11:32:27 2009 +0200 > summary: use proper empty value in Cell::index > > changeset: 9375:eb70a8e1c218 > tag: 3-2-1-rc4 > tag: qparent > user: Jaroslav Hajek <highegg@...> > date: Thu Jul 02 13:43:46 2009 +0200 > summary: allow which look for files on path > > Unless a serious problem is reported, RC4 will become the 3.2.1 > release tomorrow or on Saturday. > > cheers > > -- > RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek > computing expert & GNU Octave developer > Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU) > Prague, Czech Republic > url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz > -------------------------------------- Power up the Internet with Yahoo! Toolbar. http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/ |
|
|
Re: 3.2.1 release candidate 4All of us are involved because we see something that we would like octave to have. Some (like Jaroslav) are consistent and major contributors, and some (like myself) just do what we can, but all of us want to improve octave. So jump in! Open source software works because folks like us contribute. Bob Jaroslav Hajek wrote: On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:59 PM, WMennerichW.Mennerich@... wrote:Would it be possible to include a bugfix for this topic: http://www.nabble.com/Error-with-function-handles-of-object-methods-to24185732.html ?First of all, it is obviously only possible to apply patches that exist, and I'm not aware of any. Second, I think this is more of a missing feature than a bug. I intend to address this eventually and already have an (hopefully) elegant idea how to do it, but I'm not sure this will go into 3.2.x at all. Surely not 3.2.1, which is just behind the door. |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |