|
View:
New views
7 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
3d-gradients of skyWhen I shoot my panos and I stitch them with hugin, there are
sometimes some little "holes" at the border of the panorama, often in the sky (or at the ground). I then just copy (in gimp) the sky around it, shift and paste it. This looks ok, but not good; it would be better to make a "simple" 3d gradient fixing say four points where I know the colour of the sky and then the missing part is filled. In the attached panorama example it is visible that I did the copy&paste at the top left of the statue. My question: how do you guys handle this problem? If it is not a hugin related question and thus not to be discussed here, please let me know as well. Thanks Thomas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: 3d-gradients of skyBetter than copy/paste you might want to try the clone tool with one of the "fuzzy circle" brush that suits your needs (create one if needed). Then maybe the heal tool if you are not entirely happy with the result.
-- Sébastien On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Steiner <finbref.2006@...> wrote: When I shoot my panos and I stitch them with hugin, there are --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: 3d-gradients of sky> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Steiner <finbref.2006@...> > wrote: >> >> When I shoot my panos and I stitch them with hugin, there are >> sometimes some little "holes" at the border of the panorama, often in >> the sky (or at the ground). I then just copy (in gimp) the sky around >> it, shift and paste it. This looks ok, but not good; it would be >> better to make a "simple" 3d gradient fixing say four points where I >> know the colour of the sky and then the missing part is filled. >> In the attached panorama example it is visible that I did the >> copy&paste at the top left of the statue. >> My question: how do you guys handle this problem? >> If it is not a hugin related question and thus not to be discussed >> here, please let me know as well. Sometimes the resynthetize plugin (for Gimp) works wonders. This might be one of these cases. Cheers, Seb --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: 3d-gradients of skyThere has already been a message about this, you can look for "[hugin-ptx] adding missing sky" http://www.mail-archive.com/hugin-ptx@.../msg02390.html
I also tried using the "Liquid Rescale GIMP plugin". It works pretty well, I just had memory issues...I don't know if it's because of my PC or the plugin or Gimp. You can have a look at this discussion about missing sky here http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com/forum/t-106572/filling-panorama-picture-stitching On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:29, Seb Perez-D <sbprzd@...> wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: 3d-gradients of skyLooking at your example I would suggest shooting two rows (in portrait orientation) to achieve more vertical fov: one row tilted up so the bottom part of the images still shows details at horizon level, a second row tilted down with enough overlap so that a CP-generator can link both rows. That way you get rid of the sky problem (enough canvas to crop those missing parts that you'll always get with partial panoramas) and also will see the complete statue :-) Carl Thomas Steiner wrote: > When I shoot my panos and I stitch them with hugin, there are > sometimes some little "holes" at the border of the panorama, often in > the sky (or at the ground). I then just copy (in gimp) the sky around > it, shift and paste it. This looks ok, but not good; it would be > better to make a "simple" 3d gradient fixing say four points where I > know the colour of the sky and then the missing part is filled. > In the attached panorama example it is visible that I did the > copy&paste at the top left of the statue. > My question: how do you guys handle this problem? > If it is not a hugin related question and thus not to be discussed > here, please let me know as well. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: 3d-gradients of skyHi Thomas, While gimp is wonderful, duplicate the relevant input photo(s), then misalign them in hugin to cover your corner and then crop them as required in the crop tab so they only contribute sky. In this way, if there is a linear gradient only, exposure correction will adjust and then enblend can do its magic. Play around, check how much or how little overlap is required with the correcly aligned image area. It does work often, but not always. Cheers Klaus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: 3d-gradients of skyI use still another method in GIMP. I cut and paste as new layer a rectangular section that touches the border of the image and includes the missing bit (of sky, for example). I apply a suitable deformation to one (and only one!) side of the new layer using the "curve bend" filter. Then move the new layer in the correct position. Zooming in when moving helps aligning the new and the base layer). Merge the layers. Volker On Jun 22, 10:18 am, Thomas Steiner <finbref.2...@...> wrote: > When I shoot my panos and I stitch them with hugin, there are > sometimes some little "holes" at the border of the panorama, often in > the sky (or at the ground). I then just copy (in gimp) the sky around > it, shift and paste it. This looks ok, but not good; it would be > better to make a "simple" 3d gradient fixing say four points where I > know the colour of the sky and then the missing part is filled. > In the attached panorama example it is visible that I did the > copy&paste at the top left of the statue. > My question: how do you guys handle this problem? > If it is not a hugin related question and thus not to be discussed > here, please let me know as well. > Thanks > Thomas > > IMG_2091-IMG_2112m.jpg > 109KViewDownload You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |