On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Torsten Krah
<
tkrah@...> wrote:
> I want to fix this bug 442 and want to ask some question here about doing
> that, if thats ok, i'll hope so.
This is definitely the right place to discuss such fixes.
>
> I'll fixed the decorator not to apply shales validator renderer if the
> renderer family matches the ajax stuff, which let them work again.
> However this seams not the ultimate approach to me because there are so many
> different familys and renderers which should not be decorated, that i'll have
> to code everytime they change.
At first glance, I don't think it's a good idea to hardcode a set of
renderer families that will not apply like that. The root of the
problem is that you can't have both the validator and ajax renderers
and the combination is a valid one. So it seems like we need to
rethink (maybe) the way we handle the validator renderers.
Right now I don't have a better answer for you.
Greg
smime.p7s (2K) 