|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Linked Data/Semantic Web Application - RKBExplorerHG: We have revamped a lot of the RKB and RKBExplorer infrastructure since
last exposing it here, so you may well like to give it another visit at http://www.rkbexplorer.com/ Visited and found some ontology tendered as a reference ontology, http://www.aktors.org/ontology/. Here are the top lines: "A very simple top-level. We define something called THING, which is the top-level concept in the ontology. We then distinguish two basic types of 'things': TANGIBLE-THING, something that has some physicality, and INTANGIBLE-THING, something which has not. We use a very open definition of being tangible: obviusly a physical object is tangible, but also a sub-atomic particle is tangible, even if some of them are very tricky (you do not see them) you only see the trace they leave behind. Also a piece of software will be considered a tangible thing, it is something that you can see on a floppy disk. In contrast an algorithm will be an intangible, although the file that contains its implementation will be a tangible thing." Something more in this line: Intangible Thing is not tangible...Tangible Thing, something which is not intangible... Quantity is of two subclasses: Number and Physical Quantity, etc. Wonder is it an experimental trial or completed work? Thanks. Azamat Abdoullaev http://standardontology.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hugh Glaser" <hg@...> To: <public-lod@...>; <semantic-web@...> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 11:13 PM Subject: ANN: Linked Data/Semantic Web Application - RKBExplorer Dear Colleague, We have revamped a lot of the RKB and RKBExplorer infrastructure since last exposing it here, so you may well like to give it another visit at http://www.rkbexplorer.com/ There you will find a user interface to a world of Linked Data, although it is specifically designed to avoid exposing users to any Linked Data or Semantic Web technologies directly. We hope it looks like a "normal" Web 1.0 or 2.0 site. The RKBExplorer gives consolidated views on a core set of Linked Data sites (listed at http://www.rkbexplorer.com/data and comprising about 100M triples at 40 domains), plus the many external Linked Data sites and resolvable URIs for which it then finds references, notably dbpedia.org. This external knowledge is discovered by dynamic browsing as well as dynamic co-reference analysis, and the knowledge base for this co-reference (exposed at http://sameas.org/) currently has over 6M different entities from 20M URIs. The user domain is of workers looking to explore many aspects of researchers and research topics, although the emphasis is currently around Computer Science, and especially Resilient Systems. The underlying infrastructure for all this is very open, with RESTful interactions, and so available to anyone; however the purpose of this email is to draw attention to the RKBExplorer as a (hopefully) useful application, and a possible system that you might choose to use to demonstrate the power of Linked Data and the Semantic Web to others. Feel free to pass on the URI. Feel free to contact me if you think you might like to use a service. Best Hugh Glaser and Ian Millard http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/about/news/2602 -- Hugh Glaser, Reader Dependable Systems & Software Engineering School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ Work: +44 (0)23 8059 3670, Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 3045 Mobile: +44 (0)75 9533 4155, Home: +44 (0)23 8061 5652 http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/people/hg http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/hg/foaf.rdf "If we have a correct theory but merely prate about it, pigeonhole it, and do not put it into practice, then the theory, however good, is of no significance." |
|
|
Re: Linked Data/Semantic Web Application - RKBExplorerThanks Azamat.
On 07/07/2009 00:01, "Azamat" <abdoul@...> wrote: > HG: We have revamped a lot of the RKB and RKBExplorer infrastructure since > last > exposing it here, so you may well like to give it another visit at > http://www.rkbexplorer.com/ > > Visited and found some ontology tendered as a reference ontology, > http://www.aktors.org/ontology/. Here are the top lines: > "A very simple top-level. We define something called THING, which is the > top-level concept in the ontology. We then distinguish two basic > types of 'things': TANGIBLE-THING, something that has some physicality, and > INTANGIBLE-THING, something which has not. We use a very open definition > of being tangible: obviusly a physical object is tangible, but also a > sub-atomic particle is tangible, even if some of them are very tricky (you > do not see them) > you only see the trace they leave behind. Also a piece of software will be > considered a tangible thing, it is something that you can see on a floppy > disk. > In contrast an algorithm will be an intangible, although the file that > contains its implementation will be a tangible thing." > Something more in this line: Intangible Thing is not tangible...Tangible > Thing, something which is not intangible... Quantity is of two subclasses: > Number and Physical Quantity, etc. It was developed in the AKT Project, which ended a couple of years ago. I would say there is no maintenance activity on the AKT ontologies. We just use it as one of the ones we use, partially because there was existing data defined - we just take it as read; I guess it is legacy. > Wonder is it an experimental trial or completed work? Thanks. By "it" I assume you mean the RKB and RKBExplorer. It is neither - it is intended to be a tool for practical use, and is the subject of continuing improvement, we hope. Thank you for your interest. Regards Hugh > Azamat Abdoullaev > http://standardontology.com > |
|
|
Re: ANN: Linked Data/Semantic Web Application - RKBExplorerHugh
is fantastic to see 'the sw' in my usual browser , brilliant work especially the faceted browsing thoughts: and some aspect of the navigation and visualization could be improved. clicked on some resources and found lots of info, but could not get to the resource , (systems keeps on opening windows of information but never opens the document) would be nice to have a way maybe color code/flag to distinguish information about the resource from the resource itself, for those who are in a hurry to find the doc Some of the nomenclature may benefit from some translation ' resolvabe uri (uh? maybe add plain language on mouseover) You can also view the global equivalence closure across all repositories. (what?) etc properly labelled, it wold be a good opportunity to learn about these terms will contact you offlist for more thoughts cheers PDM On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Hugh Glaser <hg@...> wrote: Dear Colleague, |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |