ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available

[Michael Scheidell]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jm@... [mailto:jm@...]
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 6:59 PM
> To: Duane Hill
> Cc: users@...
> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
>

> really?  news to me ;)

Not sa-compile, just sa-compile on freebsd (since it requires version
.12 of re2c and port is currently at .11.1)

I have emailed the port maintainer, and may test some patches myself if
I get a chance.

_________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(tm).
For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com
_________________________________________________________________________

On Tue, 8 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jm@... [mailto:jm@...]
>> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 6:59 PM
>> To: Duane Hill
>> Cc: users@...
>> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
>>
>
>> really?  news to me ;)
>
> Not sa-compile, just sa-compile on freebsd (since it requires version
> .12 of re2c and port is currently at .11.1)
>
> I have emailed the port maintainer, and may test some patches myself if
> I get a chance.

I have just successfully installed re2c 0.12.0 from sources. The version
reported back from 're2c -V' shows '001200'. Further testing by tossing
random messages through with text from the tests, I have not seen any
errors yet.

[jyap]

Has anyone contacted the FreeBSD ports maintainer for re2c to update to  0.12.0?

On 5/8/07, Duane Hill <d.hill@...> wrote:

> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: jm@... [mailto:jm@...]
> >> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 6:59 PM
> >> To: Duane Hill
> >> Cc: users@...
> >> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
> >>
> >
> >> really?  news to me ;)
> >
> > Not sa-compile, just sa-compile on freebsd (since it requires version
> > .12 of re2c and port is currently at .11.1)
> >
> > I have emailed the port maintainer, and may test some patches myself if
> > I get a chance.
>
> I have just successfully installed re2c 0.12.0 from sources. The version
> reported back from 're2c -V' shows '001200'. Further testing by tossing
> random messages through with text from the tests, I have not seen any
> errors yet.
>

[Larry Rosenman]

Yes, there is a PR in the queue.  

The FreeBSD ports tree is currently frozen for the Xorg 7.2 import.

LER


--
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: [phone]                E-Mail: ler@...
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Yap [mailto:julianokyap@...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 5:08 PM
To: Duane Hill
Cc: users@...
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available

Has anyone contacted the FreeBSD ports maintainer for re2c to update to
0.12.0?

On 5/8/07, Duane Hill <d.hill@...> wrote:

> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: jm@... [mailto:jm@...]
> >> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 6:59 PM
> >> To: Duane Hill
> >> Cc: users@...
> >> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
> >>
> >
> >> really?  news to me ;)
> >
> > Not sa-compile, just sa-compile on freebsd (since it requires version
> > .12 of re2c and port is currently at .11.1)
> >
> > I have emailed the port maintainer, and may test some patches myself if
> > I get a chance.
>
> I have just successfully installed re2c 0.12.0 from sources. The version
> reported back from 're2c -V' shows '001200'. Further testing by tossing
> random messages through with text from the tests, I have not seen any
> errors yet.
>

[.rp]

looks like I found the problematic file:

70_imageinfo.cf

was in /etc/mail/spamassassin

[Michael Scheidell]

If you want a test,
cd /usr/ports/devel/re2c
rm -rf
get http://www.secnap.com/downloads/re2c.tgz

Untar it, make and install it, run sa-compile, and uncomment the RulesX2
line in v320.pre

Doesn't seem to do anything for SARES rules (I have ONE compiled rule in
rule_500) but it does seem to work.

--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Join SECNAP at SecureWorld Philadelphia May 16-17
http://www.secnap.com/events for free and discounted seminar tickets
_________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(tm).
For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com
_________________________________________________________________________

On Wed, 9 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:

> If you want a test,
> cd /usr/ports/devel/re2c
> rm -rf
> get http://www.secnap.com/downloads/re2c.tgz
>
> Untar it, make and install it, run sa-compile, and uncomment the RulesX2
> line in v320.pre
>
> Doesn't seem to do anything for SARES rules (I have ONE compiled rule in
> rule_500) but it does seem to work.

It installed here just fine from your previous message. I didn't have to
modify anything. Only thing I received were a couple messages about the
two patch files:

   ===>  Patching for re2c-0.12.0
   ===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for re2c-0.12.0
     I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
     I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.

Looking into the directory for the patches I see:

   %ls -l /usr/ports/devel/re2c/files
   -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  0 May  8 15:33 patch-action.cc
   -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  0 May  8 15:33 patch-substr.h

the two files are zero(0) in length.

The install still works with the limited testing I've done and does
report the correct version:

   % re2c -V
   001200

I'll probably give it a go on our secondary MX late tonight and see what
happens. I have the current SpamAssassin install backed up as well as
the entire 3.1.8 configuration and ready to roll back within minutes in
the event of any issues.

[Klaus Heinz-21]

Duane Hill wrote:

> 2) In the Makefile, it states sa-compile doesn't work on FreeBSD and
> Solaris if you elect to use it and try doing a 'make' from the port
> directory.

Can anyone tell me what is supposed to be broken on Solaris concerning
sa-compile?
I built SA 3.2.0 using the package from pkgsrc on Solaris 10, NetBSD
3.1 and Debian Sarge and sa-compile (using re2c 0.12.0) worked the
same for all three machines.

ciao
     Klaus

On Friday 04 May 2007 15:20, Jack L. Stone wrote:

> At 01:43 PM 5.2.2007 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> >Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available!  This is the official release,
> >and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
> >please use it!
> >
> >Downloads are available from:
> >  http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200705021400
>
> Any projection when SA-3.2 will be in the FBSD ports? Sent email to
> DougB@..., but bounced back.

I'm wondering when there will be a new Debian version. Duncan and Jesus, do
you need help?

--
Magnus Holmgren        holmgren@...
                       (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)

[Rose, Bobby]

Does anyone know why the UNDISC_RECIPS  was removed from 20_head_tests.cf tests?  I searched the dev lists and it's mentioned in the context of being obsolete when ran against the corpus but I've seen alot of spam that is seen as being sent to undisclosed-recipients (aka BCC).  I've added it to my local.cf but it's odd it was removed when I'm seeing it as a common factor in alot of recent spam coming to my domain after upgrading.

 

-=Bobby